Timstamp button in ckedit inserts an incorrect string ( elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by David Wallis on Thu May 28 17:28:20 2015
|
I just updated to the latest official release (V3.1.0-2411f95)
and have this problem:
The Time Stamp button pastes the logbook name when "Time format" is not specified in elogd.cfg, and when it is set to "%m/%d/%Y |
Re: LDAP docs, posted by David Wallis on Thu Jun 4 16:25:42 2015
|
This is what I've been able to figure out, in terms of the elogd.cfg file:
LDAP server = server.domain:389
LDAP userbase = ou=people,o=domain.com,dc=domain,dc=com |
|
Re: Timstamp button in ckedit inserts an incorrect string ( elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by David Wallis on Thu Jun 4 18:12:43 2015
|
Additional info:
"Time format = %Y" results in "2015" being pasted into the edit window when I hit the "time stamp" button.
|
|
Re: ckeditor "Insert Timestamp" bug (was: Three problems with elogd 3.1.0-2), posted by David Wallis on Fri Jun 5 23:02:06 2015
|
Andreas,
I too was able to track the problem down to the "gettimedate" function in elogd.c. It looks like the code is using a variable named
"str" for several different purposes. I haven't had a chance to do any testing, but my suspsicion is that the size of the dynamically allocated |
Drag-and-drop not working in elog 3.1.0, posted by David Wallis on Fri Jun 5 23:08:43 2015
|
Drag and drop for attachments dosn't work on either Chrome 37.0.2062.94 (64-bit) or FIrefox 31.5.3 (both on Linux). D&D works on the
midas.psi.ch demo page.
On my logbooks, the "drop attachements here" area does not have a dashed line border. |
|
Auto save feature not working on 3.1.0, posted by David Wallis on Fri Jun 5 23:10:27 2015
|
Auto-saving does not seem to be working. In the config file, I have the following:
Save drafts = 1
Autosave = 10 |
|
Re: Drag-and-drop not working in elog 3.1.0, posted by David Wallis on Wed Jun 10 17:45:21 2015
|
Andreas,
I am running the latest version of the elogd source RPM that I could find - ELOG V3.1.0-2411f95 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.6
(Santiago), with kernel level 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64. I can try grabbing the latest source code from Git and try building that. There are a couple |
|
PAM authentication question, posted by David Wallis on Tue Nov 5 21:42:50 2019
|
I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.
First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow
logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that. |