ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67668
|
Fri Feb 21 13:43:03 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Google Places API AutoComplete |
Garret Delaronde wrote: |
G'day everyone.
Looking for some input on this idea.
I work for an organization which uses elog extensively for day to day operations.
In several of our logbooks we use a "location" attribute where we would enter an address or intersection.
I am working with the google places api and am able to create the auto complete form in a separate html page, but am interested if anyone has a good direction how i could change the input box into the google map autocomplete search box.
I have the code already for the api search box. but when i add it to the config it doesn't really do anything different.
Attached is the html file i setup with the api code.
the autocomplete works great, now i just want it to work in elog.
Any help is much appreciated!
And perhaps the Elog Powers that be might be interested in making it a function down the road? :)
|
Looks like a nice idea. You can sneak in any JavaScript code into elog pages with the "Top text" option. Like
Top text = <script>window.onload = function() {...}</script>
Then you parse the DOM tree to find your input field for the location, and attache your JS code to it. All the input fields have the "name" attribute in the HTML code set, so it should be easy to find the input field in the DOM tree.
/Stefan
|
67673
|
Wed Mar 5 07:53:01 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.0-241 | Re: How to upload several images at once |
Alejandro Gomez wrote: |
Hi
I just want to know if there is a way to upload a bunch of images at once. I need to upload ~50 images per day and of course it is really tedious.
Thanks!!
|
The "standard" HTML protocol does not allow multiple selection of images. You can use the "elog" command-line utility to upload images from the terminal window. We plan in the summer this year a switch to HTML5, which does allow upload of multiple images plus a drag-and-drop functionality.
/Stefan |
67691
|
Tue Jul 29 16:53:18 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: New entries remotely? |
Daniel Roldan wrote: |
Hi all,
I would like to create a new entry remotely.
I would like that when the macro run, the macro automatically create a new entry in my Elog.
I was searching, but i don't saw any thing about this.
Is possible to do a new entry remotely?
Thanks for all.
|
Use the "elog" command line utility as described here under tips & tricks: http://midas.psi.ch/elog/userguide.html |
67700
|
Tue Sep 9 10:12:37 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | latest | Re: default font style |
Sara Vanini wrote: |
Hi,
is it possibile to set a default font style: format, font, size, color, etc? how?
Thanks a lot
Sara
|
You look here: http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#themes |
67702
|
Tue Sep 9 15:50:25 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | latest | Re: default font style |
Sara Vanini wrote: |
Thanks! but I'm lost in the themes/default/default.css file.... which is the entry I have to edit for the style of the body text (Format "Normal") of the elog pages?
Sara
|
Just change the body { } entry in the CSS file. Here is a good tutorial: http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_syntax.asp |
67706
|
Mon Sep 22 14:39:10 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | V2.9.2-24 | Re: Sort by date prior to 2002 |
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Chris Jennings wrote: |
Chris Jennings wrote: |
I have an attribute formatted as a date (but not labeled as date) and is sorted as second priority. The sort works fine until I enter a date older than Jan 1st 2002. When I do this it is sorted as the latest. Is this a bug or simply not designed to use dates this old?
Thanks in advance,
Chris
|
Sorry, my mistake. The cutoff date is anything before September 9th 2001 does not sort.
|
I think I remember that this has been discussed earlier: it is a little bug in elogd.
You can see where it comes from if you type in the little command 'date -d "9-Sep-2001 3:46:40" +%s'
Converted to "seconds of the epoche" (seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC) the date "9-Sep-2001 3:46:40" has one digit more than "9-Sep-2001 3:46:39".
Since elog makes a string comparison, suddenly 1'000'000'000 is less than 999'999'999; therefore the wrong sorting.
Workaround: you can modify your old entries and add a leading zero to all entries where your specific date field starts with a '9'.
Stefan: you should fix it at least well before 20-Nov-2286 18:46:40, when the same bug strikes again! 
|
Ok, well before 2286 approaches I fixed that bug and committed it to the GIT repository (master branch).
/Stefan |
67708
|
Wed Oct 22 19:55:53 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9 | Re: Network Questions |
Hal Proctor wrote: |
Our network team is doing some upgrades and would like the following questions answered if possible. 1: Is the application able to communicate with a Domain controller running Windows Server 2012 R2? And.... 2: Is the application able to function in a Windows 2008 R2 domain and forest functional level? Thanks for your help, Hal |
ELOG contains Kerberos authentication at a basic level. If I'm not mistaken, the Windows Domain controller is based on Kerberos. I do not have any 2008 or 2012 domain controller, so I cannot test, but it's worth giving it a try.
/Stefan |
67709
|
Fri Oct 24 12:51:00 2014 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | All | ALL | POODLE vulnerability |
IMPORTANT SECURITY ANNOUNCEMENT
Recently the POODLE vulnerability has been announced: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
ELOG is prone to this vulnerability if it runs directly the SSL protocol and can be accessed from the internet. If ELOG runs behind an Apache proxy, and the Apache server has been correctly configured (disabled the SSLv23 protocols), ELOG is safe as well.
To fix this vulnerability, ELOG needs to be recompiled after the attached patch has been applied. This prohibits ELOG to fallback to the insecure SSLv2 & v3 protocols and only use the safe TLSv1 protocol.
If you do not know how to recompile ELOG, please do not run ELOG directly accessible from the internet until the next binary release has been published.
/Stefan Ritt |
Attachment 1: elogd.patch
|
diff --git a/src/elogd.c b/src/elogd.c
index fac34f8..13c619f 100755
--- a/src/elogd.c
+++ b/src/elogd.c
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ int ssl_connect(int sock, SSL ** ssl_con)
SSL_library_init();
SSL_load_error_strings();
- meth = (SSL_METHOD *) SSLv23_method();
+ meth = (SSL_METHOD *) TLSv1_method();
ctx = SSL_CTX_new(meth);
*ssl_con = SSL_new(ctx);
@@ -28902,7 +28902,7 @@ SSL_CTX *init_ssl(void)
SSL_library_init();
SSL_load_error_strings();
- meth = (SSL_METHOD *) SSLv23_method();
+ meth = (SSL_METHOD *) TLSv1_method();
ctx = SSL_CTX_new(meth);
if (getcfg("global", "SSL Passphrase", pwd, sizeof(pwd))) {
|