ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68284
|
Mon Mar 14 16:00:02 2016 |
| Jimmy Bria | jimmy.bria@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 3.1.0 | Pre-populate filed based on selection |
Hi,
Is it possible to pre-populate a field based on the selection of another field. I like to have the Equipment Description field populated when the use makes a selection on the EQ# field.
Thank you,
Jimmy
|
68285
|
Tue Mar 15 03:48:58 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.0 | Re: Pre-populate filed based on selection |
Use "conditional attributes" as described in the documentation: https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#conditional
Jimmy Bria wrote: |
Hi,
Is it possible to pre-populate a field based on the selection of another field. I like to have the Equipment Description field populated when the use makes a selection on the EQ# field.
Thank you,
Jimmy
|
|
68327
|
Mon Jun 6 05:51:44 2016 |
| John Haggerty | haggerty@bnl.gov | Bug report | Mac OSX | 3.1.0 | pdf thumbnails in latest Imagemagick |
I think with the latest Imagemagick from brew (6.9.4-7) that pdf thumnails no longer get made; the attachment is there but the message "Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation" apears instead of the thumbnails. I couldn't make out from elogd -v 3 why they failed, but I couldn't make out the exact convert command that was failing. This is on MacOS 10.11.5 and I think the updated version ofImagemagick was the last thing that changed before it failed. |
68339
|
Tue Jun 21 16:33:56 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Mac OSX | 3.1.0 | Re: pdf thumbnails in latest Imagemagick |
Hi John,
I use ImageMagick 6.9.3-10 on my Mac OSX 10.11.5 and it works fine. So apparently the parameters of the ImageMagick program have been changed. If you set the logging level to 2 or higher, you should see the "convert" and "identify" commands in the logging file. If you try these commands manually from the command line, you will see if they succeed or give an error. Please post this error here so I can have a look.
Cheers,
Stefan
John Haggerty wrote: |
I think with the latest Imagemagick from brew (6.9.4-7) that pdf thumnails no longer get made; the attachment is there but the message "Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation" apears instead of the thumbnails. I couldn't make out from elogd -v 3 why they failed, but I couldn't make out the exact convert command that was failing. This is on MacOS 10.11.5 and I think the updated version ofImagemagick was the last thing that changed before it failed.
|
|
68340
|
Tue Jun 21 16:44:05 2016 |
| John Haggerty | haggerty@bnl.gov | Bug report | Mac OSX | 3.1.0 | Re: pdf thumbnails in latest Imagemagick |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hi John,
I use ImageMagick 6.9.3-10 on my Mac OSX 10.11.5 and it works fine. So apparently the parameters of the ImageMagick program have been changed. If you set the logging level to 2 or higher, you should see the "convert" and "identify" commands in the logging file. If you try these commands manually from the command line, you will see if they succeed or give an error. Please post this error here so I can have a look.
Cheers,
Stefan
John Haggerty wrote: |
I think with the latest Imagemagick from brew (6.9.4-7) that pdf thumnails no longer get made; the attachment is there but the message "Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation" apears instead of the thumbnails. I couldn't make out from elogd -v 3 why they failed, but I couldn't make out the exact convert command that was failing. This is on MacOS 10.11.5 and I think the updated version ofImagemagick was the last thing that changed before it failed.
|
|
Since I posted that, there have been multiple versions of Imagemagick released through brew for the Mac in the last few weeks, and I'm now using 6.9.4-9, which seems to work fine with thumbnails again, indeed, I noticed that as soon as 6.9.4-8 was released, I was back to normal, but thanks for the debugging pointer. |
67856
|
Wed Apr 8 11:40:27 2015 |
| Oliver Kleinau | oliver.kleinau@it.niedersachsen.de | Question | Linux | 3.1 | Max Logbooks for Email notify |
Hi,
we've got 109 logbooks in Elog. Whenever I set a notify for all logbooks in configuration menu it is limited to 73 entrys. After saving the changes the rest of the entrys are cut off.
I've already searched in the sourcecode if I can find some limitation for that but without success.
When I change the password file by hand, it is working as long as I don't change anything in the configuration that rewrites the file.
Regards,
Oliver
|
67857
|
Fri Apr 10 08:37:19 2015 |
| Oliver Kleinau | oliver.kleinau@it.niedersachsen.de | Question | Linux | 3.1 | Re: Max Logbooks for Email notify |
It seems to be the GET buffer of the elog-Server. The GET statement is cut off after &sub_lb72=1&sub_ eg. 1000 chars.
Oliver Kleinau wrote: |
Hi,
we've got 109 logbooks in Elog. Whenever I set a notify for all logbooks in configuration menu it is limited to 73 entrys. After saving the changes the rest of the entrys are cut off.
I've already searched in the sourcecode if I can find some limitation for that but without success.
When I change the password file by hand, it is working as long as I don't change anything in the configuration that rewrites the file.
Regards,
Oliver
|
|
67858
|
Fri Apr 10 09:59:42 2015 |
| Oliver Kleinau | oliver.kleinau@it.niedersachsen.de | Question | Linux | 3.1 | Re: Max Logbooks for Email notify |
It was str variable in function process_http_request in elogd.c.
This should have the size of received buffer.
PROBLEM SOLVED!!!
Oliver Kleinau wrote: |
It seems to be the GET buffer of the elog-Server. The GET statement is cut off after &sub_lb72=1&sub_ eg. 1000 chars.
Oliver Kleinau wrote: |
Hi,
we've got 109 logbooks in Elog. Whenever I set a notify for all logbooks in configuration menu it is limited to 73 entrys. After saving the changes the rest of the entrys are cut off.
I've already searched in the sourcecode if I can find some limitation for that but without success.
When I change the password file by hand, it is working as long as I don't change anything in the configuration that rewrites the file.
Regards,
Oliver
|
|
|