ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67749
|
Tue Jan 13 04:11:33 2015 |
| Banata | jogjacard@yahoo.com | Question | Linux | 3.0.0 | notification error services in CentOS 6.5 | hello, I just upgrade from 2.9 into 3.0.0 in CentOS 6.5
but after upgrade, I can't check elogd services via command line
service elogd status,
always result in missing argument, while it works with httpd or mysqld services and old elogd version.
I try to uninstall and install rom scratch and same result,
Okay I give you screenshoot of that,
you may notice, on check service status and stopping services, error resulted |
67750
|
Tue Jan 13 10:07:02 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.0.0 | Re: notification error services in CentOS 6.5 | The init script supplied with elog was originally written for Redhat. It seems like CentOS has slightly changed the init daemon management, but I'm not an expert on that, nor do I have CentOS installed. If somebody comes with a fixed elogd.init for CentOS, I'm happy to include that in the distribution.
/Stefan
Banata wrote: |
hello, I just upgrade from 2.9 into 3.0.0 in CentOS 6.5
but after upgrade, I can't check elogd services via command line
service elogd status,
always result in missing argument, while it works with httpd or mysqld services and old elogd version.
I try to uninstall and install rom scratch and same result,
Okay I give you screenshoot of that,
you may notice, on check service status and stopping services, error resulted
|
|
67751
|
Tue Jan 13 10:10:56 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Mac OSX | 3.0.0 | Re: Problem with embedded Iframes | This is an issue with CKEditor, not with ELOG.
Maybe this helps:
http://drupal.stackexchange.com/questions/96069/ckeditor-removes-iframes-in-editor-after-update-to-6-x-1-14
Eric Quintero wrote: |
We've upgraded our ELOG installation to v3, and we really like the new CKeditor. However, one of my users has noticed a problem when using Iframe HTML elements with CKeditor; namely that the HTML is not present when trying to edit the post, and saving the post erases the HTML.
I was able to reproduce this fairly simply, by trying to embed a youtube video. I would create a new post, click the "Source" view in CKeditor, and paste something like the following:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/RzZgFKoIfQI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Upon submission, this produces a totally normal .log file in the logbook directory, and the video is viewable on the ELOG page:
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:52:20 -0800
Author: test
Type: General
Category: General
Subject: test
Attachment:
Encoding: HTML
========================================
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/RzZgFKoIfQI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Then, upon hitting "Edit," I am greeted by a totally empty CKeditor window, and hitting "Source" does not display the original HTML.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
PS: Including the first line of the logfile in this very post would cause the submitted post to be truncated for some reason, although the preview looked fine. Pasting it here also caused the log to end abruptly. The string is "(dollar sign)(at symbol)MID(at symbol)(dollar sign): 9"
|
|
67763
|
Mon Jan 26 10:30:40 2015 |
| Maikolk Kein | javier.sanchez@wincor-nixdorf.com | Question | Linux | 3.0.0 | Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ? | Hi all !!!
i have just updated and 2.9.2-1 elog instance, and i have problems with the kerberos configuration.
I was surprised to see on the logs, that the 3.0 daemon was refusing to start because the system
config has kerberos listed as an authentication method. I saw on the logs that the current daemon
didnt have kerberos support compiled in.
Ive seen that there is ldap support, but couldnt find anything about configuring this auth sytem, does
amnyone have any example i could check ?
Did i have to use a patched version ? or compile it on my own ?
Regards |
67764
|
Mon Jan 26 15:04:38 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.0.0 | Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ? | Hi Maikolk,
I have elogd 3.0 running with kerberos: I had no problems with that.
Maybe you forgot to change the Makefile before compiling?
Uncomment line 28 to:
# flag for Kerberos support, please turn on if you need Kerberos
USE_KRB5 = 1
and then "make clean" and "make install" (or "make update").
Regards, Andreas
Maikolk Kein wrote: |
Hi all !!!
i have just updated and 2.9.2-1 elog instance, and i have problems with the kerberos configuration.
I was surprised to see on the logs, that the 3.0 daemon was refusing to start because the system
config has kerberos listed as an authentication method. I saw on the logs that the current daemon
didnt have kerberos support compiled in.
Ive seen that there is ldap support, but couldnt find anything about configuring this auth sytem, does
amnyone have any example i could check ?
Did i have to use a patched version ? or compile it on my own ?
Regards
|
|
67765
|
Mon Jan 26 15:06:49 2015 |
| Maikolk Kein | javier.sanchez@wincor-nixdorf.com | Question | Linux | 3.0.0 | Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ? |
No no, i used the rpm form the website... I was thinking on having the bianries compiled, im downloading the server install dvd
to replicate the environment and have the same functionality.
Thanks for the answer ;-)
Regards
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Maikolk,
I have elogd 3.0 running with kerberos: I had no problems with that.
Maybe you forgot to change the Makefile before compiling?
Uncomment line 28 to:
# flag for Kerberos support, please turn on if you need Kerberos
USE_KRB5 = 1
and then "make clean" and "make install" (or "make update").
Regards, Andreas
Maikolk Kein wrote: |
Hi all !!!
i have just updated and 2.9.2-1 elog instance, and i have problems with the kerberos configuration.
I was surprised to see on the logs, that the 3.0 daemon was refusing to start because the system
config has kerberos listed as an authentication method. I saw on the logs that the current daemon
didnt have kerberos support compiled in.
Ive seen that there is ldap support, but couldnt find anything about configuring this auth sytem, does
amnyone have any example i could check ?
Did i have to use a patched version ? or compile it on my own ?
Regards
|
|
|
67769
|
Mon Jan 26 23:13:47 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Link to full resolution image attachments | Hi all,
It's possible my question is entirely within the domain of CKeditor, but I figure it may also have something to do with how it's plugged into ELOG.
In essence, when attaching a PDF to an ELOG post as an image, the post body shows the generated thumbnail and there is a link to the full resolution PDF at the bottom of the post.
However, if instead, I attach a JPG or PNG, the link to the full resolution image is not present in the post (though it can be accessed through the small paperclip icon).
Is there a way to show links to the thumbnailed images, or even for the thumbnail itself to be a hyperlink to the full resolution source?
Thanks for your time,
Eric Q. |
67771
|
Tue Jan 27 17:03:53 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments | Strange. If I attach a big image to this post (see below), I see the thumbnail, but when I click on it it, I get redirected to the full resolution image. No idea why it is not working for you.
Eric Quintero wrote: |
Hi all,
It's possible my question is entirely within the domain of CKeditor, but I figure it may also have something to do with how it's plugged into ELOG.
In essence, when attaching a PDF to an ELOG post as an image, the post body shows the generated thumbnail and there is a link to the full resolution PDF at the bottom of the post.
However, if instead, I attach a JPG or PNG, the link to the full resolution image is not present in the post (though it can be accessed through the small paperclip icon).
Is there a way to show links to the thumbnailed images, or even for the thumbnail itself to be a hyperlink to the full resolution source?
Thanks for your time,
Eric Q.
|
|
|