Re: Permission on reply, posted by Banata Wachid Ridwan on Wed Feb 4 09:48:32 2015
|
so let say I just want to add certain members for replying logbook, so I just need to add parameter Allow reply = <user list>
and automatically all members not listed will be forbidden, am I correct?
I dont need to specify members for "Deny Reply" right ?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
You can use the switches
Alloe reply = <user list>
Deny reply = <user list>
to give only certain uses the right to use that command.
/Stefan
| Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote: |
|
is it possible to set reply only for certain member?
all members can submit lobook, but only certain member can make reply on it
thanx for help and so sorry if I have too many question :D
|
|
|
|
Re: Permission on reply, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Feb 4 10:33:16 2015
|
Hi Banata,
If you only have a few people who can reply, then use
Allow reply = <user list>
and no need to produce a "Deny reply" list.
If most people are able to reply, but a few are *not* allowed to reply - bad behaviour or whatever - then the Deny reply list is more appropriate, and no need to generate an "Allow reply" userlist.
David.
| Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote: |
|
so let say I just want to add certain members for replying logbook, so I just need to add parameter Allow reply = <user list>
and automatically all members not listed will be forbidden, am I correct?
I dont need to specify members for "Deny Reply" right ?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
You can use the switches
Alloe reply = <user list>
Deny reply = <user list>
to give only certain uses the right to use that command.
/Stefan
| Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote: |
|
is it possible to set reply only for certain member?
all members can submit lobook, but only certain member can make reply on it
thanx for help and so sorry if I have too many question :D
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CSV question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 4 13:06:52 2015
|
Allowed encoding = 1
As written in the documentation (which you should read before asking questions here)
| Banata Wachid Ridwan wrote: |
|
so I assume there is a way to force member to use plain text mode, right? :D
how to make my member force to use plain text?
thanx for help sir,
|
|
|
Re: Link to full resolution image attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 4 13:32:21 2015
|
I put the functionality you requested into the current GIT version of ELOG. It works now with Drag & Drop, but not (yet) with the toolbar uploader.
| Eric Quintero wrote: |
|
You make a valid point!
My perspective is from my lab's specific use case, in which we often post plots of data in the body of the text, and it is useful for the ELOG-generated thumbnails to link to the full resolution plot. In previous versions, I believe this was the behavior. It would be convenient for my users if this continued to be the case, but I understand that it is not neccesarily the appropriate default behavior for all users of ELOG.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.
I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.
If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?
I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.
For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you
|
|
|
Fail to install in mac, posted by Alex on Fri Feb 13 16:43:00 2015
|
Hi
I am trying to install to mac 10.10.2 - everything works almost fine, but when I issue the sudo make install I get
Installing example logbook to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo
install: logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log -> /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log
install: elogd.plist: No such file or directory
make: *** [install] Error 71
Any idea why ?
Thanks
Alex
|
Re: Fail to install in mac, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 13 19:47:43 2015 
|
Sorry I forgot to include the elogd.plist file in the distribution. I attached it to this entry, so just copy it into the elog root directory and run again "make install".
/Stefan
| Alex wrote: |
|
Hi
I am trying to install to mac 10.10.2 - everything works almost fine, but when I issue the sudo make install I get
Installing example logbook to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo
install: logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log -> /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log
install: elogd.plist: No such file or directory
make: *** [install] Error 71
Any idea why ?
Thanks
Alex
|
|
|
Re: Fail to install in mac, posted by Alex on Fri Feb 13 20:36:59 2015
|
Thanks! now install works fine - but I cannot find how to open and start writing- I do
/usr/local/sbin/elogd
elogd 3.0.0 built Feb 13 2015, 16:42:32 revision 21dc563
CKeditor detected
ImageMagick detected
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...
but nothing pops up...I mean it is not possible to run "offline" ie locally on my mac ?
|
|
Re: Fail to install in mac, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 13 21:18:46 2015
|
Point your browser to http://localhost:8080 as written in the documentation
| Alex wrote: |
|
Thanks! now install works fine - but I cannot find how to open and start writing- I do
/usr/local/sbin/elogd
elogd 3.0.0 built Feb 13 2015, 16:42:32 revision 21dc563
CKeditor detected
ImageMagick detected
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...
but nothing pops up...I mean it is not possible to run "offline" ie locally on my mac ?
|
|