Re: Standard login Screen - bottom text, posted by Barend on Thu Oct 30 21:14:32 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Barend wrote: |
Hi Stefan.
I have been "playing" around with this great tool and found an interesting "issue" ...
I use multiple logbooks and have both "Protect Selection page = 1" and "Expand Selection Page = 1".
When I open my elog, I get a Standard Login Screen with the Standard Bottom Text "ELOG V2.7.5-2130" which will link to your this website.
When I "Logout" and "Login" again from the Logbook page, I get another Login Screen with my own "Bottom text login" which will link to my own elog page.
How can I apply my own Bottom Text to the Standard Login Screen ?
Thanks & Regards, Barend
|
By using the configuration option "Bottom Text Login = ..."
|
Stefan,
I have defined the "Bottom Text Login = ..." in each Logbook Configuration section. But when I use this option in the Global Section, ELOG fails to start.
Barend
|
Re: Standard login Screen - bottom text, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 3 07:33:08 2008
|
Barend wrote: |
Stefan,
I have defined the "Bottom Text Login = ..." in each Logbook Configuration section. But when I use this option in the Global Section, ELOG fails to start.
Barend
|
That's strange. I just tried myself following configuration file:
[global]
port = 8080
Bottom text = <center>Hello</center>
Bottom text login = <center>Login Hello</center>
Password file = passwd
[demo1]
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
[demo2]
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
and everything works fine as can be seen from the login screen:

so can you check if above file works for you? |
Re: Standard login Screen - bottom text, posted by Barend on Mon Dec 29 17:27:13 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Barend wrote: |
Stefan,
I have defined the "Bottom Text Login = ..." in each Logbook Configuration section. But when I use this option in the Global Section, ELOG fails to start.
Barend
|
That's strange. I just tried myself following configuration file:
[global]
port = 8080
Bottom text = Hello
Bottom text login = Login Hello
Password file = passwd
[demo1]
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
[demo2]
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
and everything works fine as can be seen from the login screen:

so can you check if above file works for you?
|
Hi Stefan,
Hope you have enjoyed the Christmas week.
Sorry for the delay.... I have tested your configuration and it worked for me as well.
In order to determine, which of my settings is causing the problem, I had to activate each individual entry "one by one" and check if the error re-occured. I finally identified following entry "Protect Selection page = 1"
The error also occurs if I change your configuration into:
[global]
port = 8080
Bottom text = <center>Hello</center>
Bottom text login = <center>Login Hello</center>
Password file = passwd
Protect Selection page = 1
[demo1]
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
[demo2]
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Can you advise if I'm missing an entry in order for "Protect Selection page = 1" to work?
"Schönen Rutsch ins neue Jahr".
Regards,
Barend |
Re: Stack error when email notification is active, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 20 15:37:19 2009
|
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----------------------------2916890032591--
timezone: 0, offset: 0
6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries? |
Re: Stack error when email notification is active, posted by Michael Ambrus on Tue Jan 20 16:07:03 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----------------------------2916890032591--
timezone: 0, offset: 0
6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries?
|
Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.
Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.
Thanks for the help!
|
Re: Stack error when email notification is active, posted by Michael Ambrus on Wed Jan 21 14:19:45 2009
|
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----------------------------2916890032591--
timezone: 0, offset: 0
6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries?
|
Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.
Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.
Thanks for the help!
|
Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.
The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:
Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6
The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?
It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.
Regards /Michael |
Re: Stack error when email notification is active, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 21 14:31:01 2009
|
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----------------------------2916890032591--
timezone: 0, offset: 0
6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries?
|
Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.
Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.
Thanks for the help!
|
Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.
The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:
Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6
The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?
It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.
Regards /Michael
|
The Windows Binaries are not recompiled for each minor modification. You should check the SVN revistion (the number which shows up at the very bottom of the page, which is 2153 in this case). It might well be that the Windows Binaries do not yet contain the modification for extended SMTP error report.
Furthermore, TLS is not supported in elogd, only plain SMTP is possible. |
Re: Stack error when email notification is active, posted by Michael Ambrus on Wed Jan 28 14:38:52 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Michael Ambrus wrote: |
Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----------------------------2916890032591--
timezone: 0, offset: 0
6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries?
|
Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.
Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.
Thanks for the help!
|
Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.
The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:
Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6
The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?
It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.
Regards /Michael
|
The Windows Binaries are not recompiled for each minor modification. You should check the SVN revistion (the number which shows up at the very bottom of the page, which is 2153 in this case). It might well be that the Windows Binaries do not yet contain the modification for extended SMTP error report.
Furthermore, TLS is not supported in elogd, only plain SMTP is possible.
|
Thanks for the info, it saves me some time know this on beforehand.
You're right about the Windows binary, it's a lower SVN revision (2140).
|
|