Re: Turn off smileys?, posted by Ben Shepherd on Tue Oct 10 11:36:13 2006
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion. |
Thanks a lot! I'm going to pester you though - it would be really good if there was an option to turn them off completely. Surely it can't be a huge amount of work... ? |
|
Re: Append option for elog.exe, posted by Ben Shepherd on Tue Oct 10 11:40:47 2006
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Unfortunately it is not simple under Windows to extend the right-click functionality. What I do is to use a snapshot program (like HoverSnap). Triggered with a definable hot key, it grabs a region of the screen and puts it into a GIF file. Then you can attach it to an elog. I agree it takes a couple of clicks, but it's still a quick thing. |
I think you misunderstand me. I was asking whether it would be possible for the elog command-line client program to have an "append to existing entry" option. That program's actually just what I need though - thanks!
ben |
|
Re: Turn off smileys?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 10 11:45:22 2006
|
| Ben Shepherd wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion. |
Thanks a lot! I'm going to pester you though - it would be really good if there was an option to turn them off completely. Surely it can't be a huge amount of work... ? |
It's not the amount of work, it the intention to minimize the number of options. If you want a switch for the smileys, the next one wants a switch for automatic hot-linking (like http://...), the next one wants that only certain ELCode options are interpreted, not others, and then we will have a mess. By changing the ?-) definition I hope I have solved most cases without another flag. So either one has the comple ELCode set, or non. In the past I had many suggestions of new flags, which I could solve somehow otherwise. If I would not have done that, the manual would be twice as long by now... |
|
Re: Append option for elog.exe, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 10 11:47:41 2006
|
| Ben Shepherd wrote: | | I think you misunderstand me. I was asking whether it would be possible for the elog command-line client program to have an "append to existing entry" option. |
The elog command-line program has a -e switch to edit existing entries, but you need to know the ID of the entry. |
|
Re: Append option for elog.exe, posted by Ben Shepherd on Tue Oct 10 11:49:15 2006
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | The elog command-line program has a -e switch to edit existing entries, but you need to know the ID of the entry. |
Yes, but if you use -e "text" it replaces the whole entry with "text". So an append option would be really useful... |
Date format in Threaded display, posted by deletoille on Tue Oct 17 12:14:27 2006 
|
hello,
I have a problem with the Date format in the Threaded display. The Date Format appears normally in the full and the summary displays but not in the threaded one.
I have found a similar Entry in the forum posted by Steve Jones on Friday July 16 16:53:01 2004 and you answered :" That should be fixed by the current version. Please update."
Did I make a mistake?
Here is a part of my program:
Show Attributes = Date evenement, Heure evenement, Auteur, Icone, Groupe
Time format = %d/%m/%Y, %T
Type Date evenement= datetime
Start page = ?rsort= Date evenement
Thanks in advance |
Re: Date format in Threaded display, posted by Ibrahim Genc on Tue Oct 17 13:03:22 2006
|
| deletoille wrote: | hello,
Time format = %d/%m/%Y, %T
Thanks in advance |
I think "date format" and "time format" are different tags.
you may try to use date format here. |
|
Re: Date format in Threaded display, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Oct 17 13:12:52 2006
|
That fix for Steve Jones was slightly different, it had to do with substitutions in threaded display. I fixed yours now in revision 1734, so give it a try.
Salut,
Stefan |