ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67301
|
Fri Jul 13 10:45:49 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.9.2 | Re: Number of conditional attributes |
Richard Stamper wrote: |
Is there a limit on the number of conditions that can be simultaneously active in a log? When I activate more than 10 conditions I start to see side effects with other conditions being deactivated. I think this is due to the hard-coded array size of 10 for clist in the match_param function in elogd.c. If so, could this limit be increased?
Are there other limits on the number of conditions, or the length of condition names? If I've understood the code right, the _condition string holds a comma-separated list of the active conditions, so the 256 byte length of this will also put some limit on the number of conditions that can be active.
|
Ups. I never imagined that someone would use more than 10 conditions. I'm not 100% sure if the problem is the clist array, but can you try to set it to 20 and see if it gets better? You can also send me your config file and I can try it myself. |
67309
|
Thu Aug 16 15:39:43 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1 | Re: Drop down search list? |
harley skorpenske wrote: |
I'm having some confusion with configuring my logbook. In the global section of the logbook I have the quick filter enabled, but it is not a drop down list, only an editable text field:

I think it is an attributes issue, but I'm having some trouble making sense of those from the syntax page. Here is my config file:
[global]
port = 8080
usr = vulcanstaff
Max content length = 1073741824
Menu commands = New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Last day, Move to, Copy to, Import, Help
RSS Title = $subject, posted by $author on $entry time
RSS Entries = 10
Quick filter = Date, Subject, Subtext
Use Lock = 1
Reverse sort = 1
Required Attributes = Author, Subject
[Experiment_Logbook]
Theme = default
Comment = Experiment Logbook
Attributes = Author, Author Email, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Other
Options Category = Start Up
Extendable Options =Category
Page Title = $Subject
|
You get a drop-down list if you define several options for an attribut, like
Options Category = Start Up, Start Down, Other
The you can select one of the categories from the drop-down list.
|
67311
|
Thu Aug 16 15:59:53 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1 | Re: Drop down search list? |
harley skorpenske wrote: |
I forgot to mention - this is for searching the logbook. So would the config file look more like this:
[global]
port = 8080
usr = vulcanstaff
Max content length = 1073741824
Menu commands = New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Find, Last day, Move to, Copy to, Import, Help
RSS Title = $subject, posted by $author on $entry time
RSS Entries = 10
Options Category = Date, Subject, Subtext
Quick filter = Date, Subject, Subtext
Use Lock = 1
Reverse sort = 1
Required Attributes = Author, Subject
|
I know that this is for searching. But you don't get the point. You have attributes, like Date, Category, Subject. Each attribute can either contain arbitrary text (like the subject), or one of a set of predefined values. So category can be, let's day, "one", "two", "three". You define the possible options of the category with
Options Category = one, two, three
If you then define the quick filter
Quick filter = Category
then you get for the category a drop-down box where you can select "one", "two" or "three". If you do so, elog shows all logbook entries where the category attribute has the selected value.
I hope that this is clearer now. |
67313
|
Thu Aug 16 16:14:52 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1 | Re: Drop down search list? |
harley skorpenske wrote: |
Thanks Stefan, I think I understand, and now I see the options definition on the syntax page. I apologize for taking up your time and thank you for the great software. I think this is right now:
Options Search = Date, Subject, Subtext
Quick filter = Search
|
No this is not right. Better read the manual carefully, then come back here again. |
67318
|
Mon Aug 27 10:22:37 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Where do I find information on setting up the text area as a template? |
Chris Jennings wrote: |
I would like to set up the text are as a template. The documentation indicates this can be done however I am unable to find reference to how it is accomplished.
|
Just look in the documentation for "preset text = ...". |
67322
|
Wed Aug 29 10:37:44 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.8.1-235 | Re: dynamic preset text |
Zbigniew Reszela wrote: |
Dear all,
Is it possible to have a dynamic "preset text" option?
I would like to switch the template file depending on the attribute value. (Of course this attribute values will be a fixed list of options, not extandable).
I see there one difficulty, that: if user already started editing the text body, he could lose this data. But I think that this could be left on user responsibility to take care about it.
Another option could be to always insert the template text on the very beginning of the text body.
Is this feature implemented, or maybe someone have done it by changing the server code?
Cheers
|
This is possible with conditional attributes. An additional trick would be to not show the text body of an attribute is not selected. This way the user first has to select the attribute, then the text field with the specific preset will show up. The configuration would be something along these lines:
Attributes = Type, Subject
Options Type = One{1}, Two{2}, Three{3}
Show text = 0
{1} Preset text = text1
{2} Preset text = text2
{3} Preset text = text3
{1,2,3} Show text = 1
Of course you have to supply proper text files text1, text2, text3.
- Stefan
|
67323
|
Wed Aug 29 10:46:49 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | latest | Re: secure way to allow users create logbook |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
I don't think there is a good secure way so far, but would like to have your opinion.
If I want user to create logbook for themselves, what's the best way to do it? I guess Execute $attribute = <command> may work, have it write to cfg file, but obviously it impose security problem. Is there a good and secure way to allow user to create logbook themselves?
|
Actually there is no good secure way. What I usually do is to give users admin rights on individual logbooks, then they can change the config of that logbook. Many times adding some attribute is as good as creating new logbooks. Like if you need two logbooks "home" and "work", you can create an attribute "type" and let the type be "home" or "work". With conditional attributes you can make the logbook behave differently for the two values of "type" and get most functionality of two separate logbooks.
- Stefan |
67329
|
Thu Aug 30 10:00:07 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | latest | Re: secure way to allow users create logbook |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
I don't think there is a good secure way so far, but would like to have your opinion.
If I want user to create logbook for themselves, what's the best way to do it? I guess Execute $attribute = <command> may work, have it write to cfg file, but obviously it impose security problem. Is there a good and secure way to allow user to create logbook themselves?
|
Actually there is no good secure way. What I usually do is to give users admin rights on individual logbooks, then they can change the config of that logbook. Many times adding some attribute is as good as creating new logbooks. Like if you need two logbooks "home" and "work", you can create an attribute "type" and let the type be "home" or "work". With conditional attributes you can make the logbook behave differently for the two values of "type" and get most functionality of two separate logbooks.
- Stefan
|
Is there a way to set user permission based on certain attribute? can Allow command = <user list> based on attribute?
for example, say type home, user1 can read, user2 can write, user3 can not access type home, but can access type work.
In short, is access control available when I use type to get functionality of separate logbooks? If so, how is this access control done?
|
Actually I never tried that. Using conditional attributes, you could try that out, but no guarantee that it works. Like
Options type = home{1}, work{2}
{1}Login user = you, me
{2}Login user = me, other
You could play with "login user", "Allow command" and "Deny command".
/Stefan |
|