ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69842
|
Mon Dec 2 10:36:41 2024 |
| Dr Marta Divall | marta.divall@epfl.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Global change of links/file path |
Dear All,
We have been using the ELOG for several years and had inserted hyper-links instead of whole files in order to save storage space. From this month our server is moved to a new location with a new address. Is there a way for me to retrospectivelly replace all addresses with the new server file pass?
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Marta |
570
|
Tue Jul 6 23:37:02 2004 |
| G | levineg@med.govt.nz | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.3 | ELOG & Selection Page |
Hello to all,
I'm trying to get ELOG to run several separate logbooks which will
eventually have their own password/user files and other little things.
The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.
So, for my example I'd have a main page INDEX1.HTML which has links to:
/Server_Logbooks
/Other_Logbooks
but I want those top groups to just show standard ELOG generated logbook
list once you select a link on index1.html page.
Unfortunately "Selection page = index1.html" if defined in [global] just
gets used everywhere, so once I click on a link to go to
http://elog.blah.internal/Server_Logbooks it just shows the same index1.html
selection page. So I never get to the actual logbook list...
I could make separate selection pages for each top logbook group,
but that means that I have to alter those HTML files every time I add or
remove a logbook. I'd ruther have ELOG generate those pages on the fly.
Is there any way to do this?
Could I tell ELOG not to use a selection page at all for a particular group
of logbooks, and just show the logbook list.
Thank you very much.
GL.
//ELOG on FreeBSD 5.2// |
575
|
Thu Jul 8 22:01:06 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.3 | Re: ELOG & Selection Page |
> The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
> user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.
I added a new flag
Show top groups = 1
which shows the list of to groups. Hope this is what you want. The new version
is available from CVS (see download page). |
576
|
Thu Jul 8 23:41:43 2004 |
| G | levineg@med.govt.nz | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.3 | Re: ELOG & Selection Page |
Great! That takes care of the problem for sure.
Cheers once again for such a quick response.
GL.
//we use ELog very extensively internally, it's great, especially now with
replication//
> > The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
> > user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.
>
> I added a new flag
>
> Show top groups = 1
>
> which shows the list of to groups. Hope this is what you want. The new version
> is available from CVS (see download page). |
1137
|
Mon May 9 20:23:59 2005 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Version of GCC to use? |
What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9? I searched
the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this.
Thanks |
1138
|
Mon May 9 20:47:02 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Re: Version of GCC to use? |
> What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9? I searched
> the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this.
Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)
I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03. |
1139
|
Mon May 9 20:51:23 2005 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Re: Version of GCC to use? |
> > What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9? I searched
> > the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this.
>
> Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
> hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)
>
> I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.
I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors. |
1140
|
Mon May 9 20:55:36 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Other | 2.5.9 | Re: Version of GCC to use? |
> I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
into a separate directory:
...
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke 567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h
I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
occuring there. |