Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 322 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OSdown ELOG Version Subject
  69842   Mon Dec 2 10:36:41 2024 Entry Dr Marta Divallmarta.divall@epfl.chQuestionLinux | WindowsELOG V3.1.3-a38Global change of links/file path

Dear All, 

 We have been using the ELOG for several years and had inserted hyper-links instead of whole files in order to save storage space. From this month our server is moved to a new location with a new address. Is there a way for me to retrospectivelly replace all addresses with the new server file pass?

Thanks in advance, 

Best regards,

 Marta

  570   Tue Jul 6 23:37:02 2004 Question Glevineg@med.govt.nzQuestionLinux | Other2.5.3ELOG & Selection Page
Hello to all,

I'm trying to get ELOG to run several separate logbooks which will
eventually have their own password/user files and other little things.
The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.

So, for my example I'd have a main page INDEX1.HTML which has links to:
  /Server_Logbooks
  /Other_Logbooks

but I want those top groups to just show standard ELOG generated logbook
list once you select a link on index1.html page.
Unfortunately "Selection page = index1.html" if defined in [global] just
gets used everywhere, so once I click on a link to go to
http://elog.blah.internal/Server_Logbooks it just shows the same index1.html
selection page. So I never get to the actual logbook list...
I could make separate selection pages for each top logbook group,
but that means that I have to alter those HTML files every time I add or
remove a logbook. I'd ruther have ELOG generate those pages on the fly.

Is there any way to do this?
Could I tell ELOG not to use a selection page at all for a particular group
of logbooks, and just show the logbook list.

Thank you very much.

GL.

//ELOG on FreeBSD 5.2//
  575   Thu Jul 8 22:01:06 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.3Re: ELOG & Selection Page
> The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
> user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.

I added a new flag

Show top groups = 1

which shows the list of to groups. Hope this is what you want. The new version
is available from CVS (see download page).
  576   Thu Jul 8 23:41:43 2004 Reply Glevineg@med.govt.nzQuestionLinux | Other2.5.3Re: ELOG & Selection Page
Great! That takes care of the problem for sure.

Cheers once again for such a quick response.

GL.


//we use ELog very extensively internally, it's great, especially now with
replication//


> > The problem I have is I want to have a main selection type page so when a
> > user enters ELOG they see this page with links on it to main logbook groups.
> 
> I added a new flag
> 
> Show top groups = 1
> 
> which shows the list of to groups. Hope this is what you want. The new version
> is available from CVS (see download page).
  1137   Mon May 9 20:23:59 2005 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Version of GCC to use?
What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 

Thanks  
  1138   Mon May 9 20:47:02 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?
> What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
> the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 

Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)

I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.
  1139   Mon May 9 20:51:23 2005 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?
> > What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
> > the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 
> 
> Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
> hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)
> 
> I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.

I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
  1140   Mon May 9 20:55:36 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?
> I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.

mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
into a separate directory:

...
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke          0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke        567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h

I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
occuring there.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6