Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 327 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  660   Wed Aug 11 16:02:52 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows Re: Restricting viewing messages
> First - Some of the logbook entries should not be viewed by certain users.  
> What would be the easiest way to restrict viewing some entries?  

The easiest way is to define two logbooks, with two different password files.
The more restricted logbook contains only those users who are allowed to see the
restricted entries. Use the commands "Move to" to move entries between the two
logbooks (see documentation).

> Second - I have a welcome page for the ELOG that lists some info about the 
> ELOG.  When I start the ELOG, the user sees the login page.  After the user 
> logs in, the welcome page appears listing the restrictions.  Right now, I 
> have a hyperlink that takes the user to new, find, etc.  But I would like 
> to take the user right to the logbook and not have to come back to the 
> welcome page everytime.  How can I do this?

Right now you need an exteral page on a public webserver. This page contains
then links to your elog server. I the next version I will implement the
possibility to server *.html files directly through elog. You can then put your
welcome page under themes/default/Welcome.html, and access it through the
starting link:

http://your.elog.server/logbook/Welcome.html

You will only see the Welcome page once, since all links in elog will point back
to .../logbook/ and not to .../logbook/Welcome.html. The config option "Welcome
page = Welcome.html" you have to remove then of course. 
  66840   Tue Jun 8 12:02:36 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Re: Restricting logbook view

Allen wrote:

Is there anyway to restrict access so that a user can only see the log entries they post or only replies to their log entry?  I know it is possible to restrict editing to only posts they submitted, but I have a need to not even allow them to see other posts except for what they submitted and I am wondering if this is possible currently, or if this is planned, or could be planned for a future version?

No, this is not possible at the moment. As a workaround you could define one logbook per user, then restrict the user access to the individual logbooks. Of course this only makes sense if there are not too many users.

  69708   Thu Nov 2 11:46:42 2023 Reply Stefan RittNo, stefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows3.1.3Re: Restricting entries view by user

No, this is not possible with the current version of Elog, so indeed everybody needs their own logbook.

Stefan

Leonardo Tacconi wrote:

Good morning,

I would like to ask you whether it is feasible to establish a logbook that limits access to entries, enabling each user to view only their own.
Although creating a logbook per user is an apparent solution, it does not meet my requirements.

Thank you in advance.

Leonardo

 

  69709   Tue Nov 7 22:07:24 2023 Reply Matteo Manninithanksmatteo.mannini@unifi.itQuestionLinux3.1.3Re: Restricting entries view by user

Dear Stefan,

thanks to the answer you gave to my colleague. 

Now, attempting to follow your suggestion... If we will create several logbooks, one for each user,

1) there is a way to automatically duplicate all the entries in anoter "global" elog without loosing them and keeping them updated between the global and the individual logbooks? 

2) alternatively how I could activate a search in all these user logbooks (and only in this set of logbooks without searching in the others logbook present in the same file conf)? shall I gnereate a separated elog instance only for this set of logbooks? how to let this search to all option available only to a reduced number of "superusers" that are not "administrators?

thanks

 

Matteo

Stefan Ritt wrote:

No, this is not possible with the current version of Elog, so indeed everybody needs their own logbook.

Stefan

Leonardo Tacconi wrote:

Good morning,

I would like to ask you whether it is feasible to establish a logbook that limits access to entries, enabling each user to view only their own.
Although creating a logbook per user is an apparent solution, it does not meet my requirements.

Thank you in advance.

Leonardo

 

 

  69710   Thu Nov 30 14:28:12 2023 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux3.1.3Re: Restricting entries view by user

Keeping the global and individual logbooks in sync is not possible. So indded my proposal is a cumbersome solution in your case. We do have "restrict edit" which lets users only edit their own entries, but we do not have "restrict view". Maye some thought for a future version of elog.

Stefan

Matteo Mannini wrote:

Dear Stefan,

thanks to the answer you gave to my colleague. 

Now, attempting to follow your suggestion... If we will create several logbooks, one for each user,

1) there is a way to automatically duplicate all the entries in anoter "global" elog without loosing them and keeping them updated between the global and the individual logbooks? 

2) alternatively how I could activate a search in all these user logbooks (and only in this set of logbooks without searching in the others logbook present in the same file conf)? shall I gnereate a separated elog instance only for this set of logbooks? how to let this search to all option available only to a reduced number of "superusers" that are not "administrators?

thanks

 

Matteo

Stefan Ritt wrote:

No, this is not possible with the current version of Elog, so indeed everybody needs their own logbook.

Stefan

Leonardo Tacconi wrote:

Good morning,

I would like to ask you whether it is feasible to establish a logbook that limits access to entries, enabling each user to view only their own.
Although creating a logbook per user is an apparent solution, it does not meet my requirements.

Thank you in advance.

Leonardo

 

 

 

  69411   Mon Nov 15 11:48:25 2021 Reply Chris Körnerchris.koerner@physik.uni-halle.deBug reportWindows3.14Re: Restrict edit time = 0 behavior intended?

Actually this is related to post 68993 from Sebastian Schenk in Jul 2019. Are there any new workarounds I may have missed?

Chris Körner wrote:

Hi,

I have set the options "Restrict edit time = 24" and "Admin restrict edit time = 0" in [global]. This way can only edit entries for 24 hours while the admin can forever. I now want a single logbook where all users have unlimited time to edit entries. However, setting "Restrict edit time = 0" in this specific logbook behaves differently to the admin setting as it simply sets the time to 0. Is this behavior intended or a bug? I guess a workaround is to specify the edit limitation not in global but in all logbooks seperately.

 

  69412   Mon Nov 15 14:02:42 2021 Reply Sebastian Schenksebastian.schenk@physik.uni-halle.deBug reportWindows3.14Re: Restrict edit time = 0 behavior intended?

Hi Chris,

my old entry was related to the admin options of edit time.
The option "Admin restrict edit time" was implemented later, see ab8b98c

As a workaround you should be able to give "Restrict edit time" a ridiculous high number in the specific logbook, which should overwrite the global.
In the documentation is no rule specified for diabling global settings for specific logbooks, as far as i know.

Best wishes,
Sebastian

 

Chris Körner wrote:

Actually this is related to post 68993 from Sebastian Schenk in Jul 2019. Are there any new workarounds I may have missed?

Chris Körner wrote:

Hi,

I have set the options "Restrict edit time = 24" and "Admin restrict edit time = 0" in [global]. This way can only edit entries for 24 hours while the admin can forever. I now want a single logbook where all users have unlimited time to edit entries. However, setting "Restrict edit time = 0" in this specific logbook behaves differently to the admin setting as it simply sets the time to 0. Is this behavior intended or a bug? I guess a workaround is to specify the edit limitation not in global but in all logbooks seperately.

 

 

  69416   Tue Nov 16 15:14:42 2021 Reply Chris Körnerchris.koerner@physik.uni-halle.deBug reportWindows3.14Re: Restrict edit time = 0 behavior intended?

Hi Sebastian,

thanks for the reply. It is just a bit confusing that these similar settings behave so differently. For me it is no big deal to set the time for every logbook independently instead of [global], but it leaves more room for configuration errors.

Best,
Chris

Sebastian Schenk wrote:

Hi Chris,

my old entry was related to the admin options of edit time.
The option "Admin restrict edit time" was implemented later, see ab8b98c

As a workaround you should be able to give "Restrict edit time" a ridiculous high number in the specific logbook, which should overwrite the global.
In the documentation is no rule specified for diabling global settings for specific logbooks, as far as i know.

Best wishes,
Sebastian

 

Chris Körner wrote:

Actually this is related to post 68993 from Sebastian Schenk in Jul 2019. Are there any new workarounds I may have missed?

Chris Körner wrote:

Hi,

I have set the options "Restrict edit time = 24" and "Admin restrict edit time = 0" in [global]. This way can only edit entries for 24 hours while the admin can forever. I now want a single logbook where all users have unlimited time to edit entries. However, setting "Restrict edit time = 0" in this specific logbook behaves differently to the admin setting as it simply sets the time to 0. Is this behavior intended or a bug? I guess a workaround is to specify the edit limitation not in global but in all logbooks seperately.

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6