Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 333 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  67136   Fri Sep 30 22:55:01 2011 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionWindows2.7.5-2185Re: Rename Logbook

mike cianci wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

David Pilgram wrote:

Anyway, Stefan <i>et al</i> have got CERN's faster-than-light particle problem to deal with this morning.

I would be too lucky if I just could fix this as I fix some ELOG problems! I guess hundreds of physicists right now are pondering about what could have gone wrong in data taking, because nobody really believes that this is a real effect. 

 Got it to work, manipulating the files was not that hard once I got over the FEAR factor.  Good luck with the speed of light thing.

 Well done Mike!

One result is that I've also learnt things, realised that there are some known unknowns and perhaps some unknown unknowns in my

understanding of Elog.

  66716   Fri Feb 19 13:03:31 2010 Warning Tony Alberstony.albers@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.6.3Re: Remove "demo" logbook..

Tony Albers wrote:

Hi,

Is it possible to remove the "demo" logbook?

If I rename the section in elogd.cfg , it complains:

Error: logbook "demo" not defined in elog.conf Please use your browser's back button to go back

But there are other logbooks it can show instead. Is the "demo" logbook hardcoded in elogd?

 

/tony

 I now upgraded to ver. 2.7.8, but I still cannot remove or disable the demo logbook.

  66717   Fri Feb 19 13:10:50 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.6.3Re: Remove "demo" logbook..

Tony Albers wrote:

Tony Albers wrote:

Hi,

Is it possible to remove the "demo" logbook?

If I rename the section in elogd.cfg , it complains:

Error: logbook "demo" not defined in elog.conf Please use your browser's back button to go back

But there are other logbooks it can show instead. Is the "demo" logbook hardcoded in elogd?

 

/tony

 I now upgraded to ver. 2.7.8, but I still cannot remove or disable the demo logbook.

The logbook name is in the URL of your browser. In the demo installation, there is a link in the start menu pointing to http://localhost:8080/demo.  If you rename your logbook to something else, you have to change the URL accordingly. The simplest thing is to point it to http://localhost:8080, then you will be presented with a list of available logbooks.

  66718   Fri Feb 19 14:12:41 2010 Reply Tony Alberstony.albers@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.6.3Re: Remove "demo" logbook..

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Tony Albers wrote:

Tony Albers wrote:

Hi,

Is it possible to remove the "demo" logbook?

If I rename the section in elogd.cfg , it complains:

Error: logbook "demo" not defined in elog.conf Please use your browser's back button to go back

But there are other logbooks it can show instead. Is the "demo" logbook hardcoded in elogd?

 

/tony

 I now upgraded to ver. 2.7.8, but I still cannot remove or disable the demo logbook.

The logbook name is in the URL of your browser. In the demo installation, there is a link in the start menu pointing to http://localhost:8080/demo.  If you rename your logbook to something else, you have to change the URL accordingly. The simplest thing is to point it to http://localhost:8080, then you will be presented with a list of available logbooks.

 Thanks Stefan, I managed to get it to work now.

  69495   Mon Mar 14 08:49:44 2022 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux3.1.3-7933898Re: Removal of ID and Date attributes

Use the configuration option

List display = Day, Station Type, Start time UTC, ...

as written in the documentation.

Best,
Stefan

James Darrow wrote:

Hello all,

I just found elog which is a great piece  of software! I'm implementing it for use to log my shortwave listening contacts. The problem that I have is I'm moving over a current log to elog which already has a date of when the record was created, which is important.I renamed the old date to day to upload the log into elog. My problem is I don't need to see elog's ID# or date/time stamp of when the log was created seeing it's already in my data. My question is, is there any way to not show elog's ID# and date/time stamp or would I need to create a tab and if so could someone provide a config file where I could see how the tab was implemented. I've attached a screenshot of what it looks like so far. I've implemented the dark theme (which I like) that Anthoney had posted in the contibutions section.

Thanks in advance!

Jim

 

  69496   Mon Mar 14 18:45:14 2022 Reply James Darrowkb9mmc@ameritech.netQuestionLinux3.1.3-7933898Re: Removal of ID and Date attributes

That worked! Thanks Stefan

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Use the configuration option

List display = Day, Station Type, Start time UTC, ...

as written in the documentation.

Best,
Stefan

James Darrow wrote:

Hello all,

I just found elog which is a great piece  of software! I'm implementing it for use to log my shortwave listening contacts. The problem that I have is I'm moving over a current log to elog which already has a date of when the record was created, which is important.I renamed the old date to day to upload the log into elog. My problem is I don't need to see elog's ID# or date/time stamp of when the log was created seeing it's already in my data. My question is, is there any way to not show elog's ID# and date/time stamp or would I need to create a tab and if so could someone provide a config file where I could see how the tab was implemented. I've attached a screenshot of what it looks like so far. I've implemented the dark theme (which I like) that Anthoney had posted in the contibutions section.

Thanks in advance!

Jim

 

 

  67893   Mon May 11 13:15:54 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux3.1Re: Remote entries with empty messages possible?

The "command does not respond" means that the program starts reading in the main message text from the console. You can type several lines of text, and finish it off by hitting Ctrl-D (Ctrl-Z under Windows).

I see your point of having empty texts. Indeed the "" on the command line does not work presently, so you have to add a space as a workaround. I modified the elog code (committeed to bitbucket repository) to accept "" as empty text to suit your needs.

/Stefan

 

Edmund Hertle wrote:

Hey,

I want to submit an entry to elog remotley using the "elog" command. For example:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111

But this does not generate a new entry. Instead the terminal jumps to an empty new line and the command does not respond to any further inputs anymore (CTRL+C to get out). I have to add a message:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111 "test"

also using an empty string does not work:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111 ""

I could add a whitespace as a work-around, but I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature.

To put this in some context: I want to create entries for certain measurements automatically, where all relevant parameters are already attribute fields. In the usual case the actual message will be empty but might be used if the operator wants to add a note after the meausrement has been done.

 

  67895   Mon May 11 22:51:44 2015 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chQuestionLinux3.1Re: Remote entries with empty messages possible?

Hi Edmund,

Stefan already supplied a fix, but you could as well use a workaround: provide an empty file as text. The following works for Linux:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111 -m /dev/null

Cheers
Andreas
Edmund Hertle wrote:

Hey,

I want to submit an entry to elog remotley using the "elog" command. For example:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111

But this does not generate a new entry. Instead the terminal jumps to an empty new line and the command does not respond to any further inputs anymore (CTRL+C to get out). I have to add a message:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111 "test"

also using an empty string does not work:

elog -h elog-server-adress -l EO -a Fill=111 ""

I could add a whitespace as a work-around, but I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature.

To put this in some context: I want to create entries for certain measurements automatically, where all relevant parameters are already attribute fields. In the usual case the actual message will be empty but might be used if the operator wants to add a note after the meausrement has been done.

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6