Re: Record ID corruption, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 4 13:38:05 2020
|
I tried to reproduce the problem with a fresh minimal logbook (the demo one coming from the distribution). Made 60 replies and all went well. So I wonder
if it has to do with some special settings in elogd.cfg. Can you reproduce the problem with an empty logbook and an edlog.cfg which contains just the minimal
settings? |
|
Re: Real-time mirroring?, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Mon Apr 26 16:41:50 2021
|
Hello Frank,
It seems, you are using the mirror function of elog. It should resolve conflicts by itself acording to the documented rules. (https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html)
As I don't use this function, I can't say how good it works. |
|
Re: Real-time mirroring?, posted by Frank Baptista on Fri Apr 30 20:29:45 2021
|
Hi Sebatian,
Thank you for taking the time to answer...very much appreciated!
|
|
Re: Real-time mirroring?, posted by Sebastian Schenk on Fri Apr 30 21:13:39 2021
|
Hi Frank,
I am not sure, if I understood your setup correctly. But in my eyes, you don't need the local elog servers. The only difference for
the users at the chambers would be to directly use the 'mirror' remote elog url instead of the local elog url in their browsers. "which |
|
Re: Real-time mirroring?, posted by Frank Baptista on Fri Apr 30 21:55:23 2021
|
Hi Sebastian,
You're absolutely correct that the users at the chambers could directly use the remote ELOG server (without having a local server),
and I did originally think about this. Unfortunately, there are times that our network "goes down" (for maintenance and other issues), |
|
Re: Read Validation, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Apr 2 17:56:04 2016
|
Unfortunately a read confirmation is not foreseen in the Elog system. You would have to define one attribute for each shift worker, like "John has
read", "Steve has read" and so on. Then each of the shift workes has to "Edit" each message an check his/her checkmark manually.
Stefan |
|
Re: Read Validation, posted by David Pilgram on Sat Apr 2 21:21:04 2016
|
As a variant of what Stefan has suggested:
Perhaps a simple comment is set up as the pre-loaded reply - perhaps including date and time. Maybe include the author's name in the
comment, but all that is available anyway (see documentation for that). This bit isn't vital. |
|
Re: Read Validation, posted by Ed Strohak on Mon Apr 4 13:05:55 2016
|
Appreciate the help..
Thanks
David |