| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66618
|
Tue Nov 17 13:44:04 2009 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | 2.7.7-2264 | Re: Re: Re: List View: Attachments icon |
| Steve Williamson wrote: | Thanks for all of the contributions - all I meant in my original suggestion was that I'd like to be able to define which column(s) should hold the Attachments paperclip in the Full and Summary List Views, which I use all the time, to reduce the need to scroll horizontally on every page. This would be similar to being able to specify where the Edit control appears by specifying the Edit attribute in the "List Display" list.
... and I really didn't want to ruin another of Stefan's weekends or confuse anybody! |
Ok, now I got it. I will put that request on the wish list. For the moment, you can restrict the number of attributes shown in the list view with "List display = ...". This way you can maybe display less so that your table gets narrower and you save some scrolling. |
|
66617
|
Tue Nov 17 12:29:24 2009 |
| Steve Williamson | StephenWilliamson@Barnsley.gov.uk | Request | Linux | 2.7.7-2264 | Re: Re: List View: Attachments icon |
Thanks for all of the contributions - all I meant in my original suggestion was that I'd like to be able to define which column(s) should hold the Attachments paperclip in the Full and Summary List Views, which I use all the time, to reduce the need to scroll horizontally on every page. This would be similar to being able to specify where the Edit control appears by specifying the Edit attribute in the "List Display" list.
... and I really didn't want to ruin another of Stefan's weekends or confuse anybody! |
|
1742
|
Thu Mar 2 14:35:54 2006 |
| Alexandre Gauthier | supernaut@underwares.org | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1-1622 | Re: Re: Inline images URL not working |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Alexandre Gauthier wrote: | Whenever I try to insert an inline picture by using the elog:1741/1 paths with ELCode, the link becomes "logbookname2/1" (Where logbookname is the name of my logbook) and hence, doesn't work. I recall that it worked once. The image did not display, but the URL seemed correct... |
The problem has been fixed in version 2.6.1-3, so just upgrade.
| Alexandre Gauthier wrote: | | EDIT: i inserted a space in the elog URL above because regardless of the code brackets, it would still get interpreted. |
You have to put a "\" in front of everything which should not get converted into a link, so elog:1741/1 does not get interpreted. |
Hello 
This is what I have done, I checked out the trunk from subversion and built it inside my powerpc QEMU. I just updated the executables and the elcode.js file, and now it works.
Thanks! |
|
66623
|
Wed Nov 18 13:54:25 2009 |
 | soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.6 | Re: Re: Export and save problem with IE7 |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| soren poulsen wrote: |
|
Hi
Would it be possible to use the "Export to:" function with IE7 on the Forum logbook, and save the logbook.
I can do the export but saving the file with IE7 does not work. Saving the file with Firefox, Chrome, Safari works.
This makes me think that E-log is good and IE7 is bad ?
Soren
|
Right 
It seems to be a well known probmel with IE: http://classicasp.aspfaq.com/files/directories-fso/how-do-i-send-the-correct-filename-with-binarywrite.html
So I tried all variations there, but none of them worked. The interesting thing is that it works if you use it locally, but not with the forum (which has an additional "/elogs" in the URL).
|
Problem resolved. |
|
257
|
Fri Mar 21 16:52:12 2003 |
| Recai Oktas | roktas@omu.edu.tr | Info | | | Re: Re: Elog and SSL |
Ooops, I destroyed the original post, now how can we fix this :) |
|
66622
|
Wed Nov 18 13:51:55 2009 |
| soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2236 | Re: Re: Elog & SSL Export to CSV , Problem |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Chuck Brost wrote: |
|
Stefan, would it be possible to make the following change so that the document is not cached and at the same time it is possible to save it.
The change would entail replacing the "Pragma: no-cache" directive with an "Expires: " <HTTP-date> where <HTTP-date> is the same as Date header value. Please see section 14.21 of http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
Hopefully there are no other side effects to this change.
|
ok, so I removed the "Pragma: no-cache". With IE it looks fine now, and if I repeat it two times it always gets is from elog and not from the cache due to the "Expires:" statement. The "no-cache" came from old days when some browsers did not yet support the "Expires" tag. I hope that this is better now, so let's see when we get the first complaints. The modification is in SVN revision 2265.
|
This seems to work fine. |
|
66621
|
Tue Nov 17 19:31:46 2009 |
| Heinzmann | catman333@web.de | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.7 2246 | Re: Re: 2.7.6 and 2.7.7 crash upon opening logbook that runs on 2.7.5 |
| David Spindler wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| David Spindler wrote: |
|
I upgraded 2.7.5 rev 2175 to 2.7.7 rev 2246 last Thursday. I tested it with several logbooks with no problems. However I received a rep[ort today that it was down. I discovered whenever I tried to open a logbook entitled "Equipment Reservation" in the folder "EquipmentReservations" Elog would crash. I checked the elog.log file with no entries in it other than showing when it was restarted. I backed up to 2.7.5 and had no porblems with the same logbook. I repeated the upgrade to 2.7.7 with the crash problem returning. I am now back on 2.7.5 with no problems.
I just decided to try 2.7.6 rev 2239 and had the same results as 2.7.7.
This is running under Win2K with SP4 as an automatic service on port 80.
I am also running Elog V2.7.4-2118 on a different port (8080) simultaneously with no problems.
If you wish I will send the elog.cfg file. Anything else I can do to help, please let me know.
|
I need to reproduce your problem. Therefore I need the configuration and the xxxxxxa.log file containing the offending entries. You can strip it down to the minimum needed to do the crash.
|
In the process of trying to reduce it to a minimum I discovered that the entry that appears to be causing the crash is this:
|
Hi,
I´m using 2.7.7 rev 2246 and tested it with my logbooks without any problems. But today I had no chance to reach them anymore. Strange.
Regards,
Michael
|
|
1974
|
Tue Oct 10 16:15:21 2006 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Request | All | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Re: 'Inline' button for attachments |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Ben Shepherd wrote: | Hi,
and it does exactly what you want. |
cool! thanks. |
|
|