ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66743
|
Thu Mar 11 15:44:01 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.8-2282 | Re: Thread view problem in searches |
soren poulsen wrote: |
soren poulsen wrote:
|
Hi,
When I upgrade from build 2278 to 2282 the thread view changes when performing searches: The thread children are not indented and there are no "thread icons" in the search list (e.g. like the read right arrow for replies).
On the forum site I also note that the thread view is not indented when performing searches.
Does anyone have an idea ?
Soren
|
This seems to be a bug. I reproduced it with a different browser (Opera) with the default ELOG configuration. When I do Find and select Display Threads I have the message icons but the layout is not correct. Also, all message icons are of the "reply" type even if they are new threads.
This concerns only the latest build 2282.
Soren
|
That's not a bug, that's a feature 
But honestly, this feature was requested recently and implemented. See https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66670. So when searching, the thread organization is broken up and messages are treated independently. If you want to see the thread for a certain entry in you search result page, click on that entry and you will see the full thread above the entry. |
66742
|
Thu Mar 11 15:38:32 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1642 | Re: Wrong author when replying a reply |
Mads Jessen wrote: |
When replying on a reply, the author is set to the author on the original reply? Othervice it workes great!
part of code:
...
Preset Author = $long_name
Locked Attributes = Author
Subst on reply author = $long_name
...
|
I use:
Preset Author = $long_name
Preset on reply Author = $long_name
|
66741
|
Thu Mar 11 15:36:39 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: eLog crash |
Mirza Ehsan wrote: |
I am using eLog ELOG V2.6.1-1681 which has 7 log books under 8 categories. Out of 7 log books, 2 are daily used. It happened that two weeks back. I modified information on two log books which were not used for quite longtime. Hence using CONFIG, I updated these log books, changing text etc. After that eLog in general started giving error. Any time when we click SUBMIT button in any log book, eLog shows page not found. That submit crashes eLog and as a result elogd service stops. Restarting elogd service, eLog operation comes back and the log which I submitted was actualy saved. Difficulty is that this problem is happening with every single submit action.
I searched forum and learnt that upgrading eLog to newest version 2.7.8 will solve this problem. Upgrade created more problems, I was not able to open any log, authentication was not accepted. I restored that backup and went back to previous version. eLog started working but with submit error.
If any one can help me in fixing this problem
|
I propose that you get 2.7.8 working. If the authentication fails, try do do password recovery, or recreated the accounts. |
66740
|
Thu Mar 11 15:35:40 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Re: Summary text field is empty for replied entries |
You just start writing on top of the cited text 
Thomas wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Thomas wrote: |
It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?
Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.
|
In principle you can adjust the number of lines shown in the summary text file with the option summary lines = x. If you increase that value, you start seeing some part of the reply. For elog itself it is impossible to distinguish the reply text from the origial text, since some people use plain text like
> original
> text
reply
with the reply sometimes below, sometimes above the original text. Other people use full HTML with tables (like in this forum), where it is very hard internally to distinguish between original and reply text. The easiest is not to quote the original text in replies, then you will see it always.
|
Thank you very much for your answer.
Is there any way to invert the order of the original text and the reply text ?
|
|
66739
|
Thu Mar 11 15:29:40 2010 |
| Thomas | theitz@gmx.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Re: Summary text field is empty for replied entries |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Thomas wrote: |
It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?
Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.
|
In principle you can adjust the number of lines shown in the summary text file with the option summary lines = x. If you increase that value, you start seeing some part of the reply. For elog itself it is impossible to distinguish the reply text from the origial text, since some people use plain text like
> original
> text
reply
with the reply sometimes below, sometimes above the original text. Other people use full HTML with tables (like in this forum), where it is very hard internally to distinguish between original and reply text. The easiest is not to quote the original text in replies, then you will see it always.
|
Thank you very much for your answer.
Is there any way to invert the order of the original text and the reply text ? |
66738
|
Thu Mar 11 14:59:29 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Re: Summary text field is empty for replied entries |
Thomas wrote: |
It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?
Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.
|
In principle you can adjust the number of lines shown in the summary text file with the option summary lines = x. If you increase that value, you start seeing some part of the reply. For elog itself it is impossible to distinguish the reply text from the origial text, since some people use plain text like
> original
> text
reply
with the reply sometimes below, sometimes above the original text. Other people use full HTML with tables (like in this forum), where it is very hard internally to distinguish between original and reply text. The easiest is not to quote the original text in replies, then you will see it always. |
66737
|
Thu Mar 11 12:01:35 2010 |
| Thomas | theitz@gmx.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Summary text field is empty for replied entries |
It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?
Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.
|
66736
|
Wed Mar 10 10:36:02 2010 |
| Mirza Ehsan | mirza@cpjeddah.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-1681 | eLog crash |
I am using eLog ELOG V2.6.1-1681 which has 7 log books under 8 categories. Out of 7 log books, 2 are daily used. It happened that two weeks back. I modified information on two log books which were not used for quite longtime. Hence using CONFIG, I updated these log books, changing text etc. After that eLog in general started giving error. Any time when we click SUBMIT button in any log book, eLog shows page not found. That submit crashes eLog and as a result elogd service stops. Restarting elogd service, eLog operation comes back and the log which I submitted was actualy saved. Difficulty is that this problem is happening with every single submit action.
I searched forum and learnt that upgrading eLog to newest version 2.7.8 will solve this problem. Upgrade created more problems, I was not able to open any log, authentication was not accepted. I restored that backup and went back to previous version. eLog started working but with submit error.
If any one can help me in fixing this problem |