| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
566
|
Wed Jun 30 14:59:06 2004 |
 | Ralph Kuehn | r.e.kuehn@larc.nasa.gov | Question | Windows | v2.5.3 | Re: Only show log entries for logged-in user | One way would be to create a seperate logbook
for each student including the
teacher. It should then be fairly simple |
|
|
572
|
Wed Jul 7 16:43:52 2004 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | v2.5.3 | Re: Only show log entries for logged-in user | > For a large class it might be a bit cumbersome
to set it up this way.
|
|
|
1282
|
Wed Jul 20 20:54:01 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.9-2 | Re: Omitting some fields in e-mail | > E.g, if you have the following:
> Attributes = TA, Endret, UA, Pri, Status,
Oppdragsgiver, EpostTil, EpostIKT, Tittel
|
|
|
1284
|
Wed Jul 20 21:13:03 2005 |
| Michael Husbyn | michaelh@online.no | Question | Linux | 2.5.9-2 | Re: Omitting some fields in e-mail |
> I added the option "Email attributes =
<list>" for that. So you can specify
|
|
|
1398
|
Mon Aug 15 12:54:56 2005 |
| Michael Husbyn | michaelh@online.no | Question | Linux | 2.5.9-2 | Re: Omitting some fields in e-mail | >
> > I added the option "Email attributes
= <list>" for that. So you can specify
|
|
|
1410
|
Tue Sep 6 14:41:10 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.9-2 | Re: Omitting some fields in e-mail | > Is there a way to remove Logbook field (and
perhaps Logbook URL if I want?)
|
|
|
69813
|
Fri Jul 26 13:01:54 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.5-23df00d | Re: Old attachments erroneously appearing on new Elog entries. | This bug has been fixed in meantime, please
upgrade to the current version. |
|
|
69814
|
Fri Jul 26 13:14:38 2024 |
| Carl Unsworth | carl.unsworth@stfc.ac.uk | Bug report | Linux | V3.1.5-23df00d | Re: Old attachments erroneously appearing on new Elog entries. | Thanks very much for the quick response
Stefan. My apologies, I thought I was on
the latest version or I would have upgraded |
|