Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 395 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  1003   Wed Mar 23 11:19:51 2005 Agree Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itInfoLinux Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing
> Hi to all,
> 
> I've prepared a new Debian package.  This version will probably be the one
> which you'll find in Sarge/stable.
> 
> There are some invasive changes in this version which call for a serious
> test.  In accordance with a suggestion, I've changed the configuration
> mechanism.  For details, please read the NEWS.Debian file attached.
> 
> Could the Debian users who follow this forum test it and give some feedback?
> You can download the package from the following link:
> 
>   http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.org/debian/elog_2.5.8+r1592-1_i386.deb
> 
> Thanks in advance for your participation,

It seems to work nice to me.
Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
example for all allowed parameters in the distributed  /etc/default/elog

nice work :-)
  1006   Wed Mar 23 16:44:32 2005 Agree Recai Oktasroktas@omu.edu.trInfoLinux Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing
> It seems to work nice to me.
> Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> example for all allowed parameters in the distributed  /etc/default/elog

Thanks for the test.  Please note that, /etc/default/elog is partially auto
created during the installation.  All options except PIDFILE and CONFFILE are
currently listed (as configured or commented out).  If you didn't see these
options (after the update), there must be a problem.   Did you mean the lack of
PIDFILE and CONFFILE in the default file?
  1016   Thu Mar 24 12:26:46 2005 Agree Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itInfoLinux Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing
> > It seems to work nice to me.
> > Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> > example for all allowed parameters in the distributed  /etc/default/elog
> 
> Thanks for the test.  Please note that, /etc/default/elog is partially auto
> created during the installation.  All options except PIDFILE and CONFFILE are
> currently listed (as configured or commented out).  If you didn't see these
> options (after the update), there must be a problem.   Did you mean the lack of
> PIDFILE and CONFFILE in the default file?

no, my bad (it seems :-P) .. I re-installed the package now on my laptop and seems
to work fine... maybe I have swapped the diff result when installed yesterday.

Making tests I found another problem, her is the report:

####
root@emc2:/home/albert# apt-get remove elog
Lettura della lista dei pacchetti in corso... Fatto
Generazione dell'albero delle dipendenze in corso... Fatto
I seguenti pacchetti saranno RIMOSSI:
  elog
0 aggiornati, 0 installati, 1 da rimuovere e 0 non aggiornati.
È necessario prendere 0B di archivi.
Dopo l'estrazione, verranno liberati 2444kB di spazio su disco.
Continuare? [S/n]
(Lettura del database ... 152033 file e directory attualmente installati.)
Rimuovo elog ...
Stopping ELOG daemon: elogd.
root@emc2:/home/albert# rm /etc/default/elog
rm: rimuovere regular file `/etc/default/elog'? y
root@emc2:/home/albert# apt-get install elog
Lettura della lista dei pacchetti in corso... Fatto
Generazione dell'albero delle dipendenze in corso... Fatto
I seguenti pacchetti NUOVI (NEW) saranno installati:
  elog
0 aggiornati, 1 installati, 0 da rimuovere e 0 non aggiornati.
È necessario prendere 0B/530kB di archivi.
Dopo l'estrazione, verranno occupati 2444kB di spazio su disco.
Selezionato il pacchetto elog, che non lo era.
(Lettura del database ... 151926 file e directory attualmente installati.)
Spacchetto elog (da .../elog_2.5.8+r1592-1_i386.deb) ...
Configuro elog (2.5.8+r1592-1) ...
cat: /etc/default/elog: No such file or directory
Starting ELOG daemon: elogd.
####


So, removing an existing elog (not purging) and installing again raise the error.
Why installation creates the default/elog file only the first time ?  I think it
shoud do the job everytime (and everytime ask the user is there is a diff to be
checked)
  1017   Thu Mar 24 12:30:07 2005 Warning Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itInfoLinux Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing
> Hi to all,
> 
> I've prepared a new Debian package.  This version will probably be the one
> which you'll find in Sarge/stable.
> 
> There are some invasive changes in this version which call for a serious
> test.  In accordance with a suggestion, I've changed the configuration
> mechanism.  For details, please read the NEWS.Debian file attached.
> 
> Could the Debian users who follow this forum test it and give some feedback?
> You can download the package from the following link:
> 
>   http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.org/debian/elog_2.5.8+r1592-1_i386.deb
> 
> Thanks in advance for your participation,

btw, what about in including in default/elog also a voice for the "-x" switch ??

It is a security related thing and may be passed only on the command line to the
daemon, so it should be governed by the system elog admin.
  1460   Thu Oct 13 21:26:31 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.ch Linux2.6Re: New Accounts

Carl Shirey wrote:
I hope you can help me Stefan.
The problem that I am having is when someone request a account on elog I received e-mail message to activate there account. I click on the link from my e-mail to activate the account it takes me to the logon page. I log on and then I get a massage that the web does not exist.
What I found out was the elog Damon stops, and I have to restart it and everything work fine.
Here is a copy of me Elog config.

Also can you tell me how you set up the Subtext and the Show new entry buttons on the main page of the elog.

Thank for your help


I tried with the current version and could not reproduce your problem. Can you try to increase the login expiration like Login expiration = 240 for ten days. If you then click to activate an account and you have been logged in less than ten days ago, you will not be asked to logon. Does the problem then still occur?
  1464   Fri Oct 14 19:20:40 2005 Reply Carl Shireycarl.shirey@pw.utc.com Linux2.6Re: New Accounts

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Carl Shirey wrote:
I hope you can help me Stefan.
The problem that I am having is when someone request a account on elog I received e-mail message to activate there account. I click on the link from my e-mail to activate the account it takes me to the logon page. I log on and then I get a massage that the web does not exist.
What I found out was the elog Damon stops, and I have to restart it and everything work fine.
Here is a copy of me Elog config.

Also can you tell me how you set up the Subtext and the Show new entry buttons on the main page of the elog.

Thank for your help


I tried with the current version and could not reproduce your problem. Can you try to increase the login expiration like Login expiration = 240 for ten days. If you then click to activate an account and you have been logged in less than ten days ago, you will not be asked to logon. Does the problem then still occur?


No the problem does not occur when I am still log on.
  67708   Wed Oct 22 19:55:53 2014 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.9Re: Network Questions

Hal Proctor wrote:
Our network team is doing some upgrades and would like the following questions answered if possible. 1: Is the application able to communicate with a Domain controller running Windows Server 2012 R2? And.... 2: Is the application able to function in a Windows 2008 R2 domain and forest functional level? Thanks for your help, Hal

ELOG contains Kerberos authentication at a basic level. If I'm not mistaken, the Windows Domain controller is based on Kerberos. I do not have any 2008 or 2012 domain controller, so I cannot test, but it's worth giving it a try.

/Stefan 

  69674   Sat Jun 17 22:13:01 2023 Idea Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chQuestionAll3.1.3Re: Nested commands in logbook

Atrributes can only be defined once in a logbook.
But you can select which attributes are shown with the commands:

  • Show Attributes = <list>
    Attributes present in this list are shown in the single entry page. Omitting attributes can make sense for attributes which are automatically derived from other attributes via the Change <attribute> command.
  • Show Attributes Edit = <list>
    The same as Show Attributes, but for the entry form.

Those can be redifined in conditional attribute clauses.

(See https://elog.psi.ch/elog/config.html)

Leonardo Tacconi wrote:

Hi everybody,

I am trying to setup my personal ELog, defining attributes and stuff like that. I just tried to make some nested commands but I really could not achieve that. 

The idea is something like this:

Attributes = Author

Options Author = Tizio{1}, Caio{2}, Sempronio{3}

{1} Attributes = Author, Project

{1} Options Project = Proj1{a}, Proj2{b}, Proj3{c}

{a} Attributes = Author, Project, Year

{a} Options Year = 2017, 2019

Anyway, when I select Proj1 nothing really happens. So, is there any way to set up nested commands like in the reported example?

Many thanks in advance!

P.S. Is there any documentation in which are reported all the possible commands that can be used?   

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6