Re: Need fault-tolerance recommendations for using ELOG for Server Logs, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jul 26 10:29:33 2003
|
I was thinking since some time already about mirroring between elog servers,
and actually started already some implementation.
The problem with mirroring on the file level does not work. Assume two
servers "serv1" and "serv2". Then assume that one message gets submitted on
serv1 and at the same day another message gets submitted on serv2. Now you
have on both servers a file 030726a.log, but you cannot copy this file
simply from one server to the other, since you would overwrite the message
submitted on the other server. Furthermore, you need file level access,
which is maybe easy between your laptop and your desktop computer, but not
if the two mirror servers are in different countries. Like in our
collaboration we have three servers located in Switzerland, Italy and Japan
(meg.psi.ch, meg.pi.infn.it, meg.icepp.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp), where we cannot
have direct disk access.
So what I propose is the following mirror scheme:
o Each elog server may contain a list of mirror servers in the configuration
file
o Each elog server calculates an MD5 checksum from all local messages
o Synchronization between servers can be triggered manually (by clicking
on "Synchronize") or automatically at a given time and interval
o On Synchronization, the elogd server fetches the MD5 list from the mirror
server and compares it with the local list
o If a message has been edited remotely but not locally, it's fetched and
stored locally, same in the other direction
o If a message got edited on both sides since the last synchronization, the
user is asked to resolve the conflict (keep local or keep remote message)
o If there is a new message locally, its submitted at the remote server, but
with the same submission date/time as locally, same in the other direction
o If new messages are present on both sides, their message ID is changed so
that it is unique, then they are copied over. If there are already replies
to this message, their link (using the message ID) is changed accordingly
So I plan to implement this scheme in the next time. The MD5 checksum is
already there. If anybody has comments or additional wishes concerning
mirroring, telling them right now would be great, since I then can
accomodate them easier during the implementation.
- Stefan |
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 11 09:44:42 2013
|
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum? |
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by Mark Campbell on Fri Oct 11 10:18:04 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum?
|
The navigation buttons work for me but Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn does not in IE8 or Chrome.
However buttons and Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn both work in FireFox, so seems to be browser specific, I noted that in Chrome Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn moves through your open Tabs. |
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 11 10:21:52 2013
|
Mark Campbell wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum?
|
The navigation buttons work for me but Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn does not in IE8 or Chrome.
However buttons and Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn both work in FireFox, so seems to be browser specific, I noted that in Chrome Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn moves through your open Tabs.
|
I confirm that IE8 and Chrome "eat" the Ctrl-PgUp/Dn keys, so they are not passed to ELOG, and there is nothing I can do about. |
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by David Pilgram on Fri Oct 11 11:19:00 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Mark Campbell wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum?
|
The navigation buttons work for me but Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn does not in IE8 or Chrome.
However buttons and Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn both work in FireFox, so seems to be browser specific, I noted that in Chrome Ctrl-PgUp and Ctrl-PgDn moves through your open Tabs.
|
I confirm that IE8 and Chrome "eat" the Ctrl-PgUp/Dn keys, so they are not passed to ELOG, and there is nothing I can do about.
|
On this linux box, using Firefox 12, if tabs are in use, Ctrl-Pgup/Ctrl-Pgdn goes throught the tabs. If you force tabs off, then it goes through the entries.
Bavigation buttons work fine. |
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by Hung Dao on Fri Oct 11 15:59:39 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum? |
I have tried this forum, it worked fine. So, it should not be a browser. The only different I have logbook that I have been working on ELOG v2.6.5 and I have installed a new version v2.9.2. I just wonder any different data format (2.6.5 vs. 2.9.2) could have caused a problem.
|
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 11 16:18:05 2013
|
Hung Dao wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum?
|
I have tried this forum, it worked fine. So, it should not be a browser. The only different I have logbook that I have been working on ELOG v2.6.5 and I have installed a new version v2.9.2. I just wonder any different data format (2.6.5 vs. 2.9.2) could have caused a problem.
|
The data format has nothing to do with the functionality of browsing buttons. Except if you have an empty logbook, or a logbook with just one entry, then of course going forwared and backward will not make any sense. |
Re: Navigation previous and next button don't work, posted by Hung Dao on Fri Oct 11 19:20:22 2013
|
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
I am having a problem with the navigation buttons when clicking previous or next button. It does not do anything. Has anyone had this same problem? I am also using IE 10. But it seems also having a same problem on Firefox. |
Have you tried on this forum?
|
I have tried this forum, it worked fine. So, it should not be a browser. The only different I have logbook that I have been working on ELOG v2.6.5 and I have installed a new version v2.9.2. I just wonder any different data format (2.6.5 vs. 2.9.2) could have caused a problem.
|
The data format has nothing to do with the functionality of browsing buttons. Except if you have an empty logbook, or a logbook with just one entry, then of course going forwared and backward will not make any sense. |
I have a group includes more than one logbooks. One has about 1600 entries and another new one has 5 entries. I have tried them both. When I retested with v2.6.5, the buttons are still functional. This problem also exists on Firefox plus giving me a message "This is the first entry" "This is the last entry" when I clicked a previous button and next button respectively. I need to use v2.9.2 since it has many improvements |
|