Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 419 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66471   Tue Jul 28 13:30:35 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6Re: attachment not displayed if entry contains link to attachment.

Devin Bougie wrote:

I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry.  I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.

I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry.  There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.

Picture_1.png.png 

Many thanks,

Devin

I improved the mentioned check for inline attachments. Now your page correctly shows both attachments. This fix is in SVN revision 2241. 

  66470   Tue Jul 28 13:14:37 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6Re: attachment not displayed if entry contains link to attachment.

Devin Bougie wrote:

I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry.  I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.

I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry.  There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.

Picture_1.png.png 

Many thanks,

Devin

One question just for curiosity: How did you obtain the link to the attachment? Don't you first have to submit the entry, then get the attachment link via the browser ("Copy link location"), then edit the same entry, then paste a link? This is rather complicated, that's why I could not imagine that someone really does it. Or do you want to achieve something else? 

  66469   Tue Jul 28 11:04:01 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindowsv2.7.42111Re: display GMT time instead of local time in Entry time/ Last edit field

Dan Duong wrote:

Hi all,

I have set my PC in Time Zone GMT+10:00 but I get GMT time in Entry time/Last edit field.

I have installed in another PC. Which has Time Zone GMT+10:00 but I still get GMT time in Entry time/Last edit field.

Please help. Thank you very much.

 

That's strange. I use the C function localtime() to obtain the local time from Windows. The documentation says that this function checks the Windows control panel  and returns the proper local time. So far, nobody complained so I guess only you have this problem (anybody else to correct me???). The only hint I found is to set the environment variable TZ. So open a DOS box and enter

set TZ=AST+10

then start elogd.exe interactively in that dos box and see if you get something else.

  66468   Tue Jul 28 10:42:40 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6Re: attachment not displayed if entry contains link to attachment.

Devin Bougie wrote:

I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry.  I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.

I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry.  There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.

Picture_1.png.png 

Many thanks,

Devin

Well, you can have "inline" pictures like that:

elog.png 

In this case it is clumsy if this image gets displayed twice, once in the text and once as the attachment. So I look at the entry and if I find the image inlined, I suppress the display at the end. Now the "check if the image is shown inline" is a bit stupid, it just looks for the link. So I never thought that someone would just put a link in the text manually. I will have a look and see if I can change that.

  66467   Tue Jul 28 02:50:42 2009 Question Dan DuongDan.Duong@team.telstra.comQuestionWindowsv2.7.42111display GMT time instead of local time in Entry time/ Last edit field

Hi all,

I have set my PC in Time Zone GMT+10:00 but I get GMT time in Entry time/Last edit field.

I have installed in another PC. Which has Time Zone GMT+10:00 but I still get GMT time in Entry time/Last edit field.

Please help. Thank you very much.

 

  66466   Mon Jul 27 18:02:14 2009 Question Devin Bougiedab66@lepp.cornell.eduBug reportLinux2.7.6attachment not displayed if entry contains link to attachment.

I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry.  I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.

I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry.  There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.

Picture_1.png.png 

Many thanks,

Devin

  66465   Mon Jul 27 10:49:19 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6Re: Wrong error message if invalid attribute is used

T. Ribbrock wrote:

I just ran into this little bug: I had defined a new logbook in my config file and suddenly got the message Attribute "Date" not allowed. While I did have several attributes starting with the word "Date" (e.g. "Date In Service", "Date Retired") I had no attribute "Date" in there. After some pondering and wildly commenting out lines, it finally dawned on me: I had used an attribute "ID" - which is also not allowed. However, it would be very helpful if the error message actually reflected that...

Oops, just a typo. The message Attribute "Date" not allowed should read Attribute "ID" not allowed. Fixed in the current SVN version. 

  66464   Mon Jul 27 10:20:14 2009 Entry T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.6Wrong error message if invalid attribute is used

I just ran into this little bug: I had defined a new logbook in my config file and suddenly got the message Attribute "Date" not allowed. While I did have several attributes starting with the word "Date" (e.g. "Date In Service", "Date Retired") I had no attribute "Date" in there. After some pondering and wildly commenting out lines, it finally dawned on me: I had used an attribute "ID" - which is also not allowed. However, it would be very helpful if the error message actually reflected that...

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6