Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 429 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66385   Sun Jun 7 06:30:52 2009 Question Gerardo Prunedagerardopruneda@yahoo.comQuestionWindows2.7.6I can not access the Logbook from another machine

I need some guidedance on how to access the logbook from another computer. I installed the logbook on a Windows server machine and started the logbook using port 81.

I can connect to the logbook on the same machine, but I can not access it from another machine on the same network.

I already confirm that the windows firewall is not enable.

  66384   Sun Jun 7 06:29:55 2009 Question Gerardo Prunedagerardopruneda@yahoo.comQuestionWindows2.7.6I can not access the Logbook from another machine

I need some guidedance on how to access the logbook from another computer. I installed the logbook on a Windows server machine and started the logbook using port 81.

I can connect to the logbook on the same machine, but I can not access it from another machine on the same network.

I already confirm that the windows firewall is not enable.

  66383   Fri Jun 5 14:13:52 2009 Reply Mikemike@raghuexim.comBug reportLinux2.7.6-2207Re: Embedded images break when moving from one book to another.

Stefan Ritt wrote:
Mike wrote:

 This is a major improvement. The only issue now is when we embed an image in the body of the message elog makes a nice thumbnail. When you move the message to another logbook the thumbnail doesn't work and instead it shows the MASSIVE full size version of the picture instead. Is that possible to fix?

 

Thanks Stefan!

Mike

Can you try revision #2206? 

 

 Stefan,

Works perfectly, thanks for the fix you rock!

Mike

  66382   Fri Jun 5 13:18:00 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportOther2.7.5Re: elogd dies after receiving second SIGHUP
> Here is the patch.  It works under both Solaris and Linux.

Thanks! I put that into revision #2207.
  66381   Fri Jun 5 12:42:55 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6-2204Re: Embedded images break when moving from one book to another.
Mike wrote:

 This is a major improvement. The only issue now is when we embed an image in the body of the message elog makes a nice thumbnail. When you move the message to another logbook the thumbnail doesn't work and instead it shows the MASSIVE full size version of the picture instead. Is that possible to fix?

 

Thanks Stefan!

Mike

Can you try revision #2206? 

 

  66380   Fri Jun 5 12:02:45 2009 Agree David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinux2.7.6-2191Re: Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another
Thanks Stefan,  Downloading shortly and I'll let you know ;-)
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > When Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another, is it possible to prevent elog from renumbering
> > the entries' ID number(s) ($@MID@$).  While it may not be good practice, we've referred to these numbers in
> > cross-referencing, and it all goes wrong when an entry is moved from an "Open" thread to a "Closed" thread (cf
> > your FAQ about marking of whole threads).
> > 
> > In the cases I'm thinking about, i.e. from main logbook to archive logbook(s), there would never be a clash of
> > ID number.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > David Pilgram.
> 
> I have implemented this feature in revision 2205. You need to set the new flag "Preserve IDs = 1" in the 
> configuration. I have not tested this extensively, but I'm sure you will do it ;-)
  66379   Fri Jun 5 11:29:43 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.6-2191Re: Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> When Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another, is it possible to prevent elog from renumbering
> the entries' ID number(s) ($@MID@$).  While it may not be good practice, we've referred to these numbers in
> cross-referencing, and it all goes wrong when an entry is moved from an "Open" thread to a "Closed" thread (cf
> your FAQ about marking of whole threads).
> 
> In the cases I'm thinking about, i.e. from main logbook to archive logbook(s), there would never be a clash of
> ID number.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Pilgram.

I have implemented this feature in revision 2205. You need to set the new flag "Preserve IDs = 1" in the 
configuration. I have not tested this extensively, but I'm sure you will do it ;-)
  66378   Fri Jun 5 10:51:17 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.76Re: Memory leak in 2.76 elogd.exe

 

jon huang wrote:

Hi,

There's seems to be a memory leak with elogd.exe running windows.  I had this problem with older version of elogd.exe, i've just upgrade to the latest and the problems still exist. I've had this issue with earlier versions.  I've just upgrade elog to the latest 2.76 version. The memory leak still persist. I really appreciate if you or anyone here can help me resolve this issue. 

 

ELOG has been carefully designed not to contain memory leaks. The server for this forum for example runs for months without problem:

[ritt@midas ~]$ ps aux | grep elogd

elog      1958  0.4  3.1  39412 32940 ?        Ss   May09 178:16 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -D -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg

So if you have a problem, it must be specific to your installation. You should note that if you up- or download big attachents, memory gets allocated for some network buffers to contain these attachments. The buffer is kept to contain the largest attachment, it will never shrink. But once established, it will also not grow. If you see however a constant increase in memory consumption, I would appreciate if you tell me how you do this. Like which configuration you use, if you just read entries or also upload them, etc. etc. Once I can reproduce exactly your problem, I can try to fix it. 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6