Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 42 of 805  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Datedown Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  Draft   Tue May 10 12:35:40 2022 Reply Andreykowaraj4stuff@gmail.comBug reportMac OSXELOG V3.1.4-493important detail: No ^M after the last
> I think this is a bug report. 
> However, I am not sure whether the problem is in the new version of Apple's WebKit (15.4) or in the ELOG itself.
> 
> When we edit an ELOG record with Safari (as of version 15.4, new WebKit features added) there are extra "newline" symbols (actually ^M) being added after EACH line of the record.
> 
> So, for instance, if I edit the following page:
> ```
> aaa
> aaa
> aaa
> ```
> 
> then after a "Submit" (without actually any changes) the record becomes:
> ```
> aaa
> 
> aaa
> 
> aaa
> ```
> 
> Our current ELOG version is "ELOG V3.1.4-4936b76".
> Could you please have a look? 
  69529   Tue May 10 10:58:12 2022 Reply Andreykowaraj4stuff@gmail.comBug reportMac OSXELOG V3.1.4-493reproduced on the latest newly compiled Elogd
I have just setup a new ELOG server on another machine. I took the latest source code from here: http://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/tar/elog-latest.tar.gz. Compiled it and ran. 
Still the same problem with Safari.
  69528   Tue May 10 09:31:40 2022 Question Andrey`kowaraj4stuff@gmail.comBug reportMac OSXELOG V3.1.4-493duplicated/extra newlines (LF) after submit with Safari (since 15.4)
I think this is a bug report. 
However, I am not sure whether the problem is in the new version of Apple's WebKit (15.4) or in the ELOG itself.

When we edit an ELOG record with Safari (as of version 15.4, new WebKit features added) the number of "newline" symbols (actually LF, 0xA) are doubled.

So, for instance, if I edit the following page (1 LF symbol between "aaa" and "bbb"):
```
aaa
bbb
```

then after a "Submit" (without actually any changes) the record becomes (2 LF symbols):

```
aaa

bbb
```

then after a "Submit" (without actually any changes) the record becomes (4 LF symbols in between):
```
aaa



bbb
```

NOTE: The LF symbol at the end (after the "bbb" line) does NOT get duplicated (it gets truncated, I believe).


Our current ELOG version is "ELOG V3.1.4-4936b76".
Could you please have a look? 
  69527   Fri May 6 21:12:11 2022 Warning Konstantin Olchanskiolchansk@triumf.caInfoLinuxallPDF preview special steps to enable
Ubuntu LTS 20.04 and others have elog PDF preview disabled by default. To enable,
please follow these steps, see https://daq00.triumf.ca/DaqWiki/index.php/Ubuntu#Enable_elog_PDF_preview

Enable elog PDF preview
see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52998331/imagemagick-security-policy-pdf-blocking-conversion

xemacs -nw /etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml
remove this section at the end:
<!-- disable ghostscript format types -->
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="PS" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="PS2" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="PS3" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="EPS" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="PDF" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="XPS" />

K.O.
  69525   Thu May 5 11:14:20 2022 Question Antonio Bulgheroniantonio.bulgheroni@gmail.comQuestionWindows3.1.4elog root path

Dear all, 

I have a question for you. On my elog server I have plenty of images not included in any logbook entry, but that nevertheless I would the user to have access to that via the browser. In order words, I would like to have a link like this https://myelog/my_pics_folder/my_pic.png

I have realized that if I put my_pics_folder in the script folder, then it works as I wanted, but I strongly doubt this is the right position. If I put in the resources folder, it is not found and the elogd displays a message saying that my_pics_folder is not a valid logbook.

Do you have any suggestions for this problem? 

 

Thanks in advance and enjoy your day!

toto

  69524   Wed Apr 27 19:36:25 2022 Reply Konstantin Olchanskiolchansk@triumf.caQuestionWindows3.1.4-a04faf9fRe: Vulnerability?
> next is to request removal of ubuntu package.

contacted ubuntu security team, got very quick response.

they noted our request and informed us that ubuntu cannot remove packages from existing releases.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elog/+bug/1970480

K.O.
  69523   Tue Apr 26 18:03:03 2022 Reply Konstantin Olchanskiolchansk@triumf.caQuestionWindows3.1.4-a04faf9fhistory of long-removed freebsd package, Re: Vulnerability?
> > > > debian package still outdated?

the freebsd elog package was removed back in 2014 during
a purge of "not staged" packages. Originally submitted
in 2006, went through at least two maintainers.

https://www.freshports.org/www/elog/

K.O.
  69522   Tue Apr 26 17:39:49 2022 Reply Konstantin Olchanskiolchansk@triumf.caQuestionWindows3.1.4-a04faf9fRe: Vulnerability?
> > > debian package still outdated?
> removed from debian-unstable
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/elog
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1320035/removed-313-1-1-from-unstable/

contacted security@debian.org and they requested removal from the next buster/bullseye point releases:

https://bugs.debian.org/1010196
https://bugs.debian.org/1010197

next is to request removal of ubuntu package.

K.O.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6