Re: length of fields, posted by Paul Harrington on Thu Mar 3 10:21:21 2005
|
> > When creating/updating entries in elog, excluding the main text field are
> > there any limits on the size of the other fields?
>
|
|
Re: length of fields, posted by Paul Harrington on Tue Mar 8 13:16:14 2005
|
The reason for the earlier question is that we are trying to use Elog to store
data in a form we'd need to store more 1500 characters in more than one field.
|
|
Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line, posted by Paul Harrington on Fri Mar 18 10:41:39 2005
|
> > Is there any way to configure elog so that attribute fields can be edited
> > on more than line like the 'text' field?
> >
|
|
Re: can attrinute fields contain more that one line, posted by Paul Harrington on Fri Mar 18 11:06:11 2005
|
> > Was just wondering about the status of the multi-line attributes in Elog, are
> > they implemented in elog yet? If not is that something you are planning to do
> > in the future?
|
Looking for version update advice, posted by Patrick Upson on Fri Sep 13 12:02:54 2024
|
I've inherited a position that includes deploying elog for an at-sea mission. Once at sea there's no gauntee of internet connection so I have
to be sure things are going to work before hand. The machines I currently have (we have several backup machines) are running elog version 2.9.2 and
I'm looking for a change log, or feature list to determine if it's safe to update the at-sea laptops to the latest version of elog. |
|
Re: Looking for version update advice, posted by Patrick Upson on Wed Sep 25 13:26:07 2024
|
Thanks. I did eveuntaully find the change log and made the decision to upgrade the at-sea machines. So far the configuration file we update for each
mission still works. I have a copy of the 2.9.2 installer that if something catostrophic happens I can remove the new version and take it back, but I don't
think it'll be a problem. We archive logbooks at the end of a mission, but each mission basically starts from a fresh install like state anyway. |
|
Re: Looking for version update advice, posted by Patrick Upson on Wed Sep 25 15:02:16 2024
|
I ran a test (using Windows) and you're correct about the subfolder and file naming. I don't think that'll be an issue, but it's good
to be aware of. If we end up having to revert to 2.9.2 for whatever reason, I think it sould still work fine if what logs we have are just copied up a
directory (i.e /home/logfiles/2023/23mmdda.log ==> /home/logfiles/23mmdda.log) |
|
Images in notifications, posted by Patrick Sizun on Fri Feb 8 14:43:13 2019
|
Hello,
I am using Elog v3.1.1. When entries contain embedded images, these images are attached to the email notifications but are not properly displayed
in the body of the email. |