ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67793
|
Fri Jan 30 22:45:02 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments | Since I am unable to attach an image to this logbook, I made a post over the the Linux Demo logbook showing an image that was uploaded with the CKeditor toolbar "Image" button that doesn't link to the full resolution image.
Incidentially, Dario Milicic's recent commit to the git repository (83a10a5), adds the exact functionality I'm looking for to drag-and-drop attachments with the "dndfiles" CKeditor plugin. I've looked througe the "image2" code myself, but I don't have much experience with javascript, and haven't figure out how to do the equivalent for that plugin.
Thanks for your time. |
67797
|
Mon Feb 2 10:40:38 2015 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments | If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.
I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.
If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?
I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.
For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you.
Eric Quintero wrote: |
Since I am unable to attach an image to this logbook, I made a post over the the Linux Demo logbook showing an image that was uploaded with the CKeditor toolbar "Image" button that doesn't link to the full resolution image.
Incidentially, Dario Milicic's recent commit to the git repository (83a10a5), adds the exact functionality I'm looking for to drag-and-drop attachments with the "dndfiles" CKeditor plugin. I've looked througe the "image2" code myself, but I don't have much experience with javascript, and haven't figure out how to do the equivalent for that plugin.
Thanks for your time.
|
|
67800
|
Wed Feb 4 08:51:37 2015 |
| Eric Quintero | ericq@caltech.edu | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments | You make a valid point!
My perspective is from my lab's specific use case, in which we often post plots of data in the body of the text, and it is useful for the ELOG-generated thumbnails to link to the full resolution plot. In previous versions, I believe this was the behavior. It would be convenient for my users if this continued to be the case, but I understand that it is not neccesarily the appropriate default behavior for all users of ELOG.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.
I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.
If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?
I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.
For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you
|
|
67805
|
Wed Feb 4 13:32:21 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 3.0.0 | Re: Link to full resolution image attachments | I put the functionality you requested into the current GIT version of ELOG. It works now with Drag & Drop, but not (yet) with the toolbar uploader.
Eric Quintero wrote: |
You make a valid point!
My perspective is from my lab's specific use case, in which we often post plots of data in the body of the text, and it is useful for the ELOG-generated thumbnails to link to the full resolution plot. In previous versions, I believe this was the behavior. It would be convenient for my users if this continued to be the case, but I understand that it is not neccesarily the appropriate default behavior for all users of ELOG.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.
I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.
If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?
I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.
For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you
|
|
|
1100
|
Mon Apr 18 19:27:09 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.5.8 | Re: Link To command... | > Is it possible to create a Link To command (ala Copy To, Move To) that
> would allow you to reference an entry in another log book without copying it?
> This would be handy as the info would be kept current in both log books.
> My thought is that it would create a psuedo entry in the other log
> book that pointed back at the originating log book entry (similar to a
> UNIX soft link)
What you ask for is not possible due to internal reasons. The underlying database
does not support links. But what you can do is to reference a logbook entry with
elog :<loglook>/<id>
So I can reference your question with elog:Forum/1099. Some people make even
complete "summary" pages where they reference a whole set of other logbook entries like
Your question is at elog:Forum/1099
A script for thumbnail generation is at elog:Contributions/12
Demo entries: elog:Linux+Demo/14, elog:Linux+demo/1 |
68615
|
Fri Apr 28 08:15:56 2017 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: Limiting search data | I don't get your point. If you go on the list page of this forum, you see -- all entries -- in the period quick filter, but you only see one page of entries, which is rather quick. This can be changed wiht "Entries per page", which defaults to 20. Do you have a different set-up?
Alan Grant wrote: |
I'm aware there is the "Show Last Default" setting for the Find page but is there (or can there PLEASE be) a similar setting for the Period filter on the List page? Our users routinely use the Quick Filters instead and it bogs down the system because we have lots of logbooks. Many thanks.
|
|
68616
|
Fri Apr 28 11:59:30 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: Limiting search data | I think I understand the question (although I have no answer):
When someone uses the "Find" page search, then there is an option to limit the search to e.g. the last year. If you search for a non existing string, it'll only search entries from the past year.
If people are instead using the quickfilter to search for the same non existing string, then all entries of all past years are searched for the string.
In both cases the result page will be empty, so "Entries per page" does not change anything. But in the second case the search might need an order of magnitude longer.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I don't get your point. If you go on the list page of this forum, you see -- all entries -- in the period quick filter, but you only see one page of entries, which is rather quick. This can be changed wiht "Entries per page", which defaults to 20. Do you have a different set-up?
Alan Grant wrote: |
I'm aware there is the "Show Last Default" setting for the Find page but is there (or can there PLEASE be) a similar setting for the Period filter on the List page? Our users routinely use the Quick Filters instead and it bogs down the system because we have lots of logbooks. Many thanks.
|
|
|
68617
|
Fri Apr 28 12:33:55 2017 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.2 | Re: Limiting search data | Ok, got it. Will put it on the to-do list.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
I think I understand the question (although I have no answer):
When someone uses the "Find" page search, then there is an option to limit the search to e.g. the last year. If you search for a non existing string, it'll only search entries from the past year.
If people are instead using the quickfilter to search for the same non existing string, then all entries of all past years are searched for the string.
In both cases the result page will be empty, so "Entries per page" does not change anything. But in the second case the search might need an order of magnitude longer.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I don't get your point. If you go on the list page of this forum, you see -- all entries -- in the period quick filter, but you only see one page of entries, which is rather quick. This can be changed wiht "Entries per page", which defaults to 20. Do you have a different set-up?
Alan Grant wrote: |
I'm aware there is the "Show Last Default" setting for the Find page but is there (or can there PLEASE be) a similar setting for the Period filter on the List page? Our users routinely use the Quick Filters instead and it bogs down the system because we have lots of logbooks. Many thanks.
|
|
|
|
|