Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 442 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  66490   Tue Aug 4 10:48:26 2009 Reply Ricardo Goncalojgoncalo@mail.cern.chQuestionMac OSX2.7.6Re: Problems when trying to set up mirror elog

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Ricardo Goncalo wrote:

Retrieving entries from "https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/ATLAS Trigger"...

Remote server is not an ELOG server

 
...so I'm running out of options. Any ideas would be welcome!
Cheers,
Ricardo

 

Your problem is here. I wrote that synchronization is not possible through SSL, but you try to access https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080 which is SSL (because you have https:// not http://). 

 Ah, I see. Hmm, ok it doesn't work without the s either. I can't access the server in that case. Ok, I think I'll just wait for this feature to be available. Thanks for your help!

  66491   Tue Aug 4 11:22:18 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionMac OSX2.7.6Re: Problems when trying to set up mirror elog

Ricardo Goncalo wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Ricardo Goncalo wrote:

Retrieving entries from "https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/ATLAS Trigger"...

Remote server is not an ELOG server

 
...so I'm running out of options. Any ideas would be welcome!
Cheers,
Ricardo

 

Your problem is here. I wrote that synchronization is not possible through SSL, but you try to access https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080 which is SSL (because you have https:// not http://). 

 Ah, I see. Hmm, ok it doesn't work without the s either. I can't access the server in that case. Ok, I think I'll just wait for this feature to be available. Thanks for your help!

 Of course you also have to switch your mirror server not to use SSL as well. You can check this then by accessing it directly via http://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/ATLAS Trigger from the same computer. Also make sure that you don't have any firewall issue.

  66494   Wed Aug 5 19:05:01 2009 Question Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduRequestAll2.7.6alphabetize Quick Filter items?

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

  66495   Thu Aug 6 08:00:22 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.7.6Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items

Options Type = C, D, A, B

they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like

Options Type = A, B, C, D

I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.

- Stefan 

  66502   Fri Aug 7 23:09:42 2009 Reply Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduRequestAll2.7.6Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items

Options Type = C, D, A, B

they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like

Options Type = A, B, C, D

I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.

- Stefan 

 Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!

 

  66503   Mon Aug 10 17:14:48 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.7.6Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items

Options Type = C, D, A, B

they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like

Options Type = A, B, C, D

I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.

- Stefan 

 Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!

 

Ok, I implemented

Sort attribute options = 1

in the current SVN revision. 

  66623   Wed Nov 18 13:54:25 2009 Cool soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chQuestionLinux2.7.6Re: Re: Export and save problem with IE7

Stefan Ritt wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi

Would it be possible to use the "Export to:" function with IE7 on the Forum logbook, and save the logbook.

I can do the export but saving the file with IE7 does not work. Saving the file with Firefox, Chrome, Safari works.

This makes me think that E-log is good and IE7 is bad ?

Soren 

Right   

It seems to be a well known probmel with IE: http://classicasp.aspfaq.com/files/directories-fso/how-do-i-send-the-correct-filename-with-binarywrite.html 

So I tried all variations there, but none of them worked. The interesting thing is that it works if you use it locally, but not with the forum (which has an additional "/elogs" in the URL).

 

 

 Problem resolved.

  67208   Mon Mar 5 16:19:24 2012 Question Paraic Faheyparaic.fahey@pfizer.comBug reportWindows2.7.6Record Proliferation

Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT.

MOre significantly this then leads to a proliferation of instances of the same record being generated in the logfile and consequently on the logbook.

Has anybody a fix or advice on this?

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6