ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66490
|
Tue Aug 4 10:48:26 2009 |
| Ricardo Goncalo | jgoncalo@mail.cern.ch | Question | Mac OSX | 2.7.6 | Re: Problems when trying to set up mirror elog |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Ricardo Goncalo wrote: |
Retrieving entries from "https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/ATLAS Trigger"...
Remote server is not an ELOG server
...so I'm running out of options. Any ideas would be welcome!
Cheers,
Ricardo
|
Your problem is here. I wrote that synchronization is not possible through SSL, but you try to access https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080 which is SSL (because you have https:// not http://).
|
Ah, I see. Hmm, ok it doesn't work without the s either. I can't access the server in that case. Ok, I think I'll just wait for this feature to be available. Thanks for your help! |
66491
|
Tue Aug 4 11:22:18 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Mac OSX | 2.7.6 | Re: Problems when trying to set up mirror elog |
Ricardo Goncalo wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Ricardo Goncalo wrote: |
Retrieving entries from "https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/ATLAS Trigger"...
Remote server is not an ELOG server
...so I'm running out of options. Any ideas would be welcome!
Cheers,
Ricardo
|
Your problem is here. I wrote that synchronization is not possible through SSL, but you try to access https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080 which is SSL (because you have https:// not http://).
|
Ah, I see. Hmm, ok it doesn't work without the s either. I can't access the server in that case. Ok, I think I'll just wait for this feature to be available. Thanks for your help!
|
Of course you also have to switch your mirror server not to use SSL as well. You can check this then by accessing it directly via http://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/ATLAS Trigger from the same computer. Also make sure that you don't have any firewall issue. |
66494
|
Wed Aug 5 19:05:01 2009 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@berkeley.edu | Request | All | 2.7.6 | alphabetize Quick Filter items? | Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis |
66495
|
Thu Aug 6 08:00:22 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.7.6 | Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items? |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan |
66502
|
Fri Aug 7 23:09:42 2009 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@berkeley.edu | Request | All | 2.7.6 | Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
66503
|
Mon Aug 10 17:14:48 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.7.6 | Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items? |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Dennis Seitz wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.
We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.
I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?
Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!
Dennis
|
The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items
Options Type = C, D, A, B
they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like
Options Type = A, B, C, D
I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.
- Stefan
|
Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!
|
Ok, I implemented
Sort attribute options = 1
in the current SVN revision. |
66623
|
Wed Nov 18 13:54:25 2009 |
| soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.6 | Re: Re: Export and save problem with IE7 |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
soren poulsen wrote: |
Hi
Would it be possible to use the "Export to:" function with IE7 on the Forum logbook, and save the logbook.
I can do the export but saving the file with IE7 does not work. Saving the file with Firefox, Chrome, Safari works.
This makes me think that E-log is good and IE7 is bad ?
Soren
|
Right
It seems to be a well known probmel with IE: http://classicasp.aspfaq.com/files/directories-fso/how-do-i-send-the-correct-filename-with-binarywrite.html
So I tried all variations there, but none of them worked. The interesting thing is that it works if you use it locally, but not with the forum (which has an additional "/elogs" in the URL).
|
Problem resolved. |
67208
|
Mon Mar 5 16:19:24 2012 |
| Paraic Fahey | paraic.fahey@pfizer.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.6 | Record Proliferation | Saving, using Submit sees recently updated fields cleared after hitting SUBMIT.
MOre significantly this then leads to a proliferation of instances of the same record being generated in the logfile and consequently on the logbook.
Has anybody a fix or advice on this? |
|