> I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables

I tried to just exchange the attached binaries in my installation but this didn't worked.
elogd was not able to start.

Regards,

daniel

Sure. Just figure out the URL from your browser and then use it in wget, e.g.

wget https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/220309_175728/elog-3.1.4-1ebfd06c-win64.zip

to download one attachement from this forum.

Stefan

unfortunately instructions do not exist to cover every possible situation.

but in general, to migrate elog to a new machine, I would say do this:
- on new machine, install new elog from scratch
- copy the old elogs from "logbooks" on the backup disk to the new elog "logbooks"
- merge the config file by hand (this may require a few tries)

feel free to ask for more help with any of these steps here.
K.O.

> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
> > removal of unmaintained out-of-date insecure versions of their stuff. ROOT
> > was in the same situation years ago, the Debian package for ROOT was very old version,
> > also built incorrectly, and everybody complained to us that our stuff does
> > not work (midas, rootana, etc).
> 
> Yeah, I have to recompile the Windows version. Unfortunately my old Windows PC is gone, I
> switched now completely to MacOSX and Linux. Probably have to borrow something from somewhere.
> If anybody can compile the Windows version with the current source code I would be happy.

it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/ 
It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows, and the debian package still outdated?

Personally, I don't think removing download links and pulling packages should be more than a temporary measure.
Treating people fairly IMHO means they should be able to reach a safe version by the same means that brought and left them exposed.

A clear central source would be best, one that has 

- package autobuilds
- source
- cve list

If I understand correctly, currently only the source is up to date?


(I found py_elog on Github, so it could be an easy option to mirror ELOG there and let some free service handle the autobuilds.
I don't know how well one can flag vulnerabilities there, but likely it's possible, and ideally more people would help there.)


p.s.: My hat is off to the sysadmin who checked carefully, I wanted to introduce ELOG in a windows-centric place and I can't swear I would have checked this (official) download as well.

Would it be possible to download attachments (e.g. with elog or wget) from the command line?

Hello,

I do have a backup of elog repository in an external disk (with a directory name .elog). I want to install this repository to a new linux (either ubuntu 20.xx or Cent OS 7) computer. I am new to this, can someone please provide me an instructions sheet. 

Thank you

Hello,

Is there a possibility to use like the time stamp a user stamp: by clicking the button in the main text entry it adds the username, just like the time stamp button does: Tue Apr 12 08:58:46 2022 ?

I searched but I'm not sure how this would be correctly named.

Thanks,

G