Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 469 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6459 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 468, 469, 470 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  66109   Fri Dec 12 08:07:59 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportMac OSX2.7.5Re: Attribute value lost when adding to another extendable attribute

 

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Here is an excerpt from my config file:

Type Last Edit = datetime
Preset Last Edit =$entry time
Locked Attributes = Last Edit
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
Preset on Duplicate Last Edit = $date

I have another attribute called Part that I've made extendable.

When I duplicate an entry, Last Edit is updated with the current date correctly. However, as soon as I click the Add Part button next to my extendable Part attribute, and the page reloads to show the entry box for the Part field, the Last Entry field is replaced with a "-".

I have to submit and then re-edit the entry to get Last Edit to have a valid value again.

 

 *EDIT*:

I noticed that any time the page reloads while in the entry screen this happens, e.g. by selecting plain instead of html format.

 

 Thanks for reporting that problem. It has been fixed in SVN revision 2156.

  66112   Sat Dec 13 02:13:51 2008 Reply Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduBug reportMac OSX2.7.5Re: Attribute value lost when adding to another extendable attribute

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Here is an excerpt from my config file:

Type Last Edit = datetime
Preset Last Edit =$entry time
Locked Attributes = Last Edit
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
Preset on Duplicate Last Edit = $date

I have another attribute called Part that I've made extendable.

When I duplicate an entry, Last Edit is updated with the current date correctly. However, as soon as I click the Add Part button next to my extendable Part attribute, and the page reloads to show the entry box for the Part field, the Last Entry field is replaced with a "-".

I have to submit and then re-edit the entry to get Last Edit to have a valid value again.

 

 *EDIT*:

I noticed that any time the page reloads while in the entry screen this happens, e.g. by selecting plain instead of html format.

 

 Thanks for reporting that problem. It has been fixed in SVN revision 2156.

 

 Excellent! Thank you.

  66131   Tue Dec 30 21:13:02 2008 Question Mark Langkaumark@langkau.orgQuestionLinux | Windows2.7.5Problems with SSL and Synchronization

I installed ELOG on a Linux server (CentOS 5.2) and a WinXP laptop.

- If I set both servers to non-SSL, I can synchronize with no problems.

- If I set both servers to use SSL, synchronization fails with "Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long" 

- If I set one to ssl and the other non-ssl, synchronization fails with "Remote server is not an ELOG server"

Is anyone synchronizing or mirroring two ELOG servers with SSL? When either or both servers are set to use SSL, I can use either site. but I can't synchronize.

 

Thanks
  66132   Wed Dec 31 11:31:49 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows2.7.5Re: Problems with SSL and Synchronization

 

Mark Langkau wrote:

I installed ELOG on a Linux server (CentOS 5.2) and a WinXP laptop.

- If I set both servers to non-SSL, I can synchronize with no problems.

- If I set both servers to use SSL, synchronization fails with "Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long" 

- If I set one to ssl and the other non-ssl, synchronization fails with "Remote server is not an ELOG server"

Is anyone synchronizing or mirroring two ELOG servers with SSL? When either or both servers are set to use SSL, I can use either site. but I can't synchronize.

 

Synchronization with SSL does not yet work. I have to find some time to implement it. Since you are already the second one mentioning this, it slipped higher on my to-do list  

  66139   Fri Jan 9 22:40:59 2009 Question Devin Bougiedab66@cornell.eduQuestionLinux2.7.5ELOG scalability

Hi, All.  We have been successfully using ELOG in a limited deployment for a couple years now.  However, we are about to embark on a new project that could run for up to 10 years, and are wondering what sort of scalability we can expect from ELOG.

Are there any problems we can expect to run into as the number of entries grow?  I see in a previous thread that "elog runs fine for a few 10000 entries. At 100000 entries it starts getting slow."  Is this still the case, or have any improvements been made?  What sort of problems would we expect to run into?  Any examples of existing large deployments would be very useful.

 

Many thanks,

Devin 

 

 

 

 

 

  66140   Sat Jan 10 09:58:43 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.5Re: ELOG scalability

 

Devin Bougie wrote:

Hi, All.  We have been successfully using ELOG in a limited deployment for a couple years now.  However, we are about to embark on a new project that could run for up to 10 years, and are wondering what sort of scalability we can expect from ELOG.

Are there any problems we can expect to run into as the number of entries grow?  I see in a previous thread that "elog runs fine for a few 10000 entries. At 100000 entries it starts getting slow."  Is this still the case, or have any improvements been made?  What sort of problems would we expect to run into?  Any examples of existing large deployments would be very useful.

 

The above made statement is not true any more. Mainly due to the large CERN experiments, some speed improvements have been made in late 2007. So elog runs fine at least up to 100000 entries. The startup time might be a bit slow, since it parses all entries there, but beyond the maybe 20s startup time, there is not a big difference when browsing entries. The only peoblem left is if you try to search some text through 100000 entries, this could be a bit slow. I have not tried anhything beyond 100000 entries, because this was not requested so far. If logooks become too big, the entreis could be split into several logbooks. Even if there are several logbooks with 100000 entries each, the access time should not be slower than if there would be one logbook with 100000 entries.

  66142   Sun Jan 11 00:02:34 2009 Reply John Rouillardrouilj+elog@cs.umb.eduCommentWindows2.7.5Re: Multi attribute email notification

mike cianci wrote:

Your suggestion worked GREAT (like always)

 

 Could you post an example of what you used?

  66151   Wed Jan 14 19:52:04 2009 Question Yoichi Asoasoy01@gmail.comQuestionAll2.7.5Multiple keyword search
Hi,
I have a question regarding how to perform a multiple-keyword search.
For example, when I want to find entries which contain two keywords "abc" and "def" in the body text but in an unknown order,
one way I came up with was to use a regular expression like this.
(abc|def).*(abc|def)
But this will also match entries containing two "abc" or two "def".
The following one will eliminate this problem.
(abc.*def)|(def.*abc)
But when I use more than two keywords, this type of regular expressions becomes very long (because I have to list all the permutations of the keywords) and it may not fit in the search text field (there seems to be a limit on the length of the search text).

Is there any way to allow multiple-keyword search easily ?
It would be nice if I can just enter two or more keywords separated by white spaces and elog finds entries containing all the keywords.

Thanks,
Yoichi
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 468, 469, 470 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6