Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 471 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  66164   Wed Jan 21 14:19:45 2009 Reply Michael Ambrusambrmi09@gmail.comBug reportWindows2.7.5Re: Stack error when email notification is active

Michael Ambrus wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

 

-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream


-----------------------------2916890032591--

timezone: 0, offset: 0
      6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

 

Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries? 

Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.

Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.

Thanks for the help!

 

 

Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.

The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:

Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6

The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?

It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.

Regards /Michael

  66165   Wed Jan 21 14:31:01 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.7.5Re: Stack error when email notification is active

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

 

-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream


-----------------------------2916890032591--

timezone: 0, offset: 0
      6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

 

Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries? 

 

Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.

Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.

Thanks for the help!

 

 

 

Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.

The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:

Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6

The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?

It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.

Regards /Michael

 

The Windows Binaries are not recompiled for each minor modification. You should check the SVN revistion (the number which shows up at the very bottom of the page, which is 2153 in this case). It might well be that the Windows Binaries do not yet contain the modification for extended SMTP error report.

Furthermore, TLS is not supported in elogd, only plain SMTP is possible. 

  66173   Mon Jan 26 22:01:07 2009 Question Devin Bougiedab66@cornell.eduBug fixLinux2.7.5convert: unrecognized option '-set'
Hello,

We are now running elog-2.7.5 in a Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL4) system, which uses ImageMagick 6.0.7.1.  After uploading an image, the image 
manipulation buttons don't work and complain:
convert: unrecognized option '-set'

We are using an RPM built from source, and it looks like I should be able to just change "-set comment ..." to "-comment" as in:
------
[dab66@lnx100 tmp]% diff elogd.c elogd.c.new 
22601c22601
<       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
---
>       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
22607c22607
<       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
---
>       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
22618c22618
<       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
---
>       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
22624c22624
<       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
---
>       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
------

Is there any better way for us to fix this, or is anything else needed?

Thanks,
Devin
  66176   Tue Jan 27 09:19:22 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug fixLinux2.7.5Re: convert: unrecognized option '-set'
> Hello,
> 
> We are now running elog-2.7.5 in a Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL4) system, which uses ImageMagick 6.0.7.1.  After uploading an image, the image 
> manipulation buttons don't work and complain:
> convert: unrecognized option '-set'
> 
> We are using an RPM built from source, and it looks like I should be able to just change "-set comment ..." to "-comment" as in:
> ------
> [dab66@lnx100 tmp]% diff elogd.c elogd.c.new 
> 22601c22601
> <       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> ---
> >       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> 22607c22607
> <       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> ---
> >       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, new_rot,
> 22618c22618
> <       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> ---
> >       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> 22624c22624
> <       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -set comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> ---
> >       sprintf(cmd, "convert '%s' -rotate %d -thumbnail %d -comment ' %d' '%s'", file_name, cur_rot,
> ------
> 
> Is there any better way for us to fix this, or is anything else needed?

Well, I believe your modification won't work. I just tried it with ImageMagick 6.3.8 and it failed. Try to rotate your picture four times, and 
it should be back to the old position. When I use "-comment" instead "-set comment" on a PNG file, this did not work. From the man page it 
tells me:

Version: ImageMagick 6.3.8 01/25/08 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2008 ImageMagick Studio LLC

Usage: convert [options ...] file [ [options ...] file ...] [options ...] file

Image Settings:
  ...
  -comment string      annotate image with comment
  ...

Image Operators:
  ...
  -set property value  set an image property
  ...


So indeed "-comment" and "-set comment" are two different things. I'm afraid you have to upgrade your ImageMagick package in order to make 
this work.
  66183   Wed Jan 28 14:38:52 2009 Reply Michael Ambrusambrmi09@gmail.comBug reportWindows2.7.5Re: Stack error when email notification is active

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

 

-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream


-----------------------------2916890032591--

timezone: 0, offset: 0
      6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

 

Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries? 

 

Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.

Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.

Thanks for the help!

 

 

 

Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.

The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:

Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6

The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?

It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.

Regards /Michael

 

The Windows Binaries are not recompiled for each minor modification. You should check the SVN revistion (the number which shows up at the very bottom of the page, which is 2153 in this case). It might well be that the Windows Binaries do not yet contain the modification for extended SMTP error report.

Furthermore, TLS is not supported in elogd, only plain SMTP is possible. 

Thanks for the info, it saves me some time know this on beforehand.

You're right about the Windows binary, it's a lower SVN revision (2140).

 

  66184   Wed Jan 28 14:39:56 2009 Reply Michael Ambrusambrmi09@gmail.comBug reportWindows2.7.5Re: Stack error when email notification is active

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Michael Ambrus wrote:

Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

 

-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream


-----------------------------2916890032591--

timezone: 0, offset: 0
      6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

 

Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries? 

 

Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.

Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.

Thanks for the help!

 

 

 

Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.

The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:

Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6

The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?

It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.

Regards /Michael

 

The Windows Binaries are not recompiled for each minor modification. You should check the SVN revistion (the number which shows up at the very bottom of the page, which is 2153 in this case). It might well be that the Windows Binaries do not yet contain the modification for extended SMTP error report.

Furthermore, TLS is not supported in elogd, only plain SMTP is possible. 

Thanks for the info, it saves me some time know this on beforehand.

You're right about the Windows binary, it's a lower SVN revision (2140).

 

  66188   Wed Feb 4 18:08:42 2009 Angy Devin Bougiedab66@cornell.eduRequestLinux2.7.5frequent crashes on SL4
Hi, All.  Ever since upgrading from an old ELOG release on an aging windows machine to the latest version on Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL4), and 
greatly increasing its use, we have seen frequent crashes of elogd.  This has become very disruptive to operations, and any help would be greatly 
appreciated.  We are using Apache (running on the same machine as elogd) to secure ELOG using https as per the Administrator's Guide.

Anecdotally, the crashes seem to frequently happen when a user is attaching an image.  However, most of the time attachments succeed without 
incident.

I attempted to obtain a stack trace by attaching gdb to the process, but elogd died during the night.  It was urgently needed, so I needed to kill 
the elogd process (ptrace() kept it hanging around) and therefore could not obtain a stack trace.  For what it's worth, here is the output we do see in 
gdb:
------
[root@lnx248 ~]# gdb /usr/local/sbin/elogd 6162
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.143.el4rh)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"...(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".

Attaching to program: /usr/local/sbin/elogd, process 6162
Reading symbols from /lib/libssl.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libssl.so.4
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3
Reading symbols from /lib/libcom_err.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libcom_err.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3
Reading symbols from /lib/libresolv.so.2...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libresolv.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.4
Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libz.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libz.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_nis.so.2...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_nis.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1
0x007ef7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Detaching after fork from child process 17720.
Detaching after fork from child process 17723.
Detaching after fork from child process 17726.
Detaching after fork from child process 17729.
Detaching after fork from child process 17732.
Detaching after fork from child process 17735.
Detaching after fork from child process 17738.
Detaching after fork from child process 17741.
Detaching after fork from child process 17744.
Detaching after fork from child process 17747.
Detaching after fork from child process 17750.
Detaching after fork from child process 17753.
Detaching after fork from child process 17756.
Detaching after fork from child process 17759.
Detaching after fork from child process 17762.
Detaching after fork from child process 17765.
Detaching after fork from child process 17768.
Detaching after fork from child process 17771.
Detaching after fork from child process 17774.
Detaching after fork from child process 17777.
Detaching after fork from child process 17780.
Detaching after fork from child process 17783.
Detaching after fork from child process 17786.
Detaching after fork from child process 17789.
Detaching after fork from child process 17792.
Detaching after fork from child process 17795.
Detaching after fork from child process 17798.
Detaching after fork from child process 17801.
Detaching after fork from child process 17807.
Detaching after fork from child process 17820.
Detaching after fork from child process 17823.
Detaching after fork from child process 17826.
Detaching after fork from child process 17829.
Detaching after fork from child process 17832.
Detaching after fork from child process 17835.
Detaching after fork from child process 17838.
Detaching after fork from child process 17841.
Detaching after fork from child process 17844.
Detaching after fork from child process 17847.
Detaching after fork from child process 17850.
Detaching after fork from child process 17853.
Detaching after fork from child process 17856.
Detaching after fork from child process 17859.
Detaching after fork from child process 17862.
Detaching after fork from child process 17865.
Detaching after fork from child process 17868.
Detaching after fork from child process 17871.
Detaching after fork from child process 25429.
Detaching after fork from child process 25432.
Detaching after fork from child process 25472.
Detaching after fork from child process 25475.
Detaching after fork from child process 25478.
Detaching after fork from child process 25481.
Detaching after fork from child process 25525.
Detaching after fork from child process 25528.
Detaching after fork from child process 25572.
Detaching after fork from child process 25575.
Detaching after fork from child process 25578.
Detaching after fork from child process 25581.
Detaching after fork from child process 32422.
Detaching after fork from child process 32425.
Detaching after fork from child process 32437.
Detaching after fork from child process 32440.
Detaching after fork from child process 32469.
Detaching after fork from child process 32472.
Detaching after fork from child process 32478.
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
Detaching after fork from child process 32481.
ptrace: No such process.
0x007ef7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(gdb) bt
#0  0x007ef7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Cannot access memory at address 0xbfe43894
------

I plan on letting elogd create a core dump, but so far I haven't managed to change its cwd to a directory elog can write to.

Please let me know if there is any other information I can provide.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks,
Devin 
  66189   Wed Feb 4 18:46:58 2009 Reply Edmundo T Rodriguezedrodrig@chpnet.orgRequestLinux2.7.5Re: frequent crashes on SL4
> ------
> 
> I plan on letting elogd create a core dump, but so far I haven't managed to change its cwd to a directory 
elog can write to.
> 
> Please let me know if there is any other information I can provide.  Any suggestions would be greatly 
appreciated.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Devin 

There are other debugers ...

  Whay don't you give them a try?

  example: Install "strace" (if you don't have it) and do something like ...

           strace   gdb /usr/local/sbin/elogd 6162  -debug 2>debug.out


   Also there is "ltrace", etc.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6