ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66720
|
Sat Feb 20 18:29:31 2010 |
| tom | tnielsen91@gmail.com | Question | Linux | latest | Preset text = | I am looking for the correct syntax for Preset Text =
I have an html file I want set in the editor so that my users can just enter in the data below the predetermined heading. What is the correct syntax/file location.
Thanks! |
67438
|
Mon Feb 18 20:12:25 2013 |
| Tom Langford | tlangfor@umd.edu | Question | Linux | 2.9.1-2435 | Re: Protect Selection page=1 |
Ocane wrote: |
Hi,
I have several top groups and each has several logbooks.
If I use the global option Protect Selection page=1 and Show top groups = 1, after an user logs in to the top group selection URL, the elog steers away from the top group selection page, and automatically brings him to the logbook selection page of the first top group. Is the elog programmed to exhibit this behavior?
What I would prefer is that, after an user logs in, the elog stays on the top group selection page, sine each user has his preferred destination, not always the logbooks in the first top group. Is there any setting I can use in the config file to do this?
(My users need to access different top groups and logbooks on regular basis).
Thank you and regards.
|
I am currently having a similar problem. I am migrating a few separate elogs to one new computer. I have three top groups set up with their own password files. If I log into top group A (TGA), and then try to go to top group B (TGB), I am presented with a "Create new user" screen for my login name for TGA. When I complete that form, I am taken to the user settings for top group A, rather than TGB. I can log out of TGA and then log into TGB fine, but if I try to switch between them without logging out, it freaks out.
There seems to be a problem with the cookies that keep me logged into the different top groups not recognizing that they are different entities. I'm running eLog 2.9.1 rev 436. Is it possible that this has been addressed in 2.9.2?
Thanks,
-t |
68355
|
Tue Jul 12 16:18:46 2016 |
| Jason S | titancomp@hotmail.ca | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Using Reply option | Forgive me I'm not incredibly Elog savy yet.
A little backround about this log book - I have our log set up as individual user names. The log book is designed for entrys to be made when a process shutdown needs to be bypassed. The operator will create an entry and submit it. Then a supervisor will come in after and review/approve it. I've removed the edit function, but left the "Reply" option available for the supervisor to go into the same entry and check off the "Reviewed" attribute. When the reviewed attribute is checked off, even with a different logged in author the next entry ID still shows the original author that put in the entry rather then the author who clicked reviewed. If there a way to get around this?
[Process Bypass]
Comment = (Not in use right now, currently developing)
Attributes = Author, Date/Time of Bypass, Equipment Name, Device Tag, Supervisor Sign-off,
Moptions Supervisor Sign-off = Reviewed
List Menu commands = New, Find, Logout
Menu Commands = New, Find, Reply, Logout
Required Attributes = Date/Time of ByPass, Equipment Name, Device Tag
|
68357
|
Tue Jul 12 20:53:03 2016 |
| Jason S | titancomp@hotmail.ca | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-3f311c5 | Re: Using Reply option | Works Great. Thanks Andreas
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Preset on reply Author = $long_name
Cheers, Andreas
Jason S wrote: |
Forgive me I'm not incredibly Elog savy yet.
A little backround about this log book - I have our log set up as individual user names. The log book is designed for entrys to be made when a process shutdown needs to be bypassed. The operator will create an entry and submit it. Then a supervisor will come in after and review/approve it. I've removed the edit function, but left the "Reply" option available for the supervisor to go into the same entry and check off the "Reviewed" attribute. When the reviewed attribute is checked off, even with a different logged in author the next entry ID still shows the original author that put in the entry rather then the author who clicked reviewed. If there a way to get around this?
[Process Bypass]
Comment = (Not in use right now, currently developing)
Attributes = Author, Date/Time of Bypass, Equipment Name, Device Tag, Supervisor Sign-off,
Moptions Supervisor Sign-off = Reviewed
List Menu commands = New, Find, Logout
Menu Commands = New, Find, Reply, Logout
Required Attributes = Date/Time of ByPass, Equipment Name, Device Tag
|
|
|
68682
|
Mon Sep 4 11:22:05 2017 |
| Tim Schelfhout | timpieworks@gmail.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-fd7 | edit elog config via elog web interface | Hello,
Is it possible to edit the entire elog config file via the elog frontend? I see the config button
on some screens but it only allows me to change user and password??
Thankx |
68703
|
Fri Nov 24 08:54:38 2017 |
| Tim Schelfhout | timpieworks@gmail.com | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-fd7 | Config: conditional coloring of items when 2 conditions are met (and|or) | Hello,
Trying to color an entry log when 2 conditions are met. Tried
Style Result Hired and Administration NOK = background-color:red
where Result and Administration are Attributes. Anyone?
|
68715
|
Mon Jan 15 15:56:07 2018 |
| Tim Schelfhout | timpieworks@gmail.com | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-fd7 | Unsafe browsing | Hello there,
Can anyone point out to me how I can avoid the unsafe browsing when accessing our local ELOG?
Browsing with chrome and always getting the unsafe browsing page. One has to go through the advanced
button to continue ...
I once had my setup with SSL certificate (local signed, not through the CA) but I somehow cannot get it
to work anymore. Just create a local certificate and copy the certificates to all browsers that access the ELOG site, no?
Anyway, a small guide would be great. |
895
|
Thu Jan 27 19:09:55 2005 |
| Tim Fowler | timfowler1@gmail.com | Request | Linux | Windows | 2.5.5-3 | Automatic Export | Is there any way to automatically export the logbook(s)? |
|