Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 482 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OSdown ELOG Version Subject
  66851   Wed Jul 21 12:33:39 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxlatestRe: Enable user to view only, not post/delete.

Denis Perevalov wrote:

I have a question. Is there a way to enable user to view only, not post/delete in my elog. Also I would like to allow them to view only certain categories of my messages.

The first thing you can do with "Guest menu commands", where you enable only those commands which can't change or delete entries. The second thing you can only do if you put your entries into two separate logbooks, a public and a private one. 

  66852   Wed Jul 21 16:26:17 2010 Question soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Subst variables and Execute

Hi

 

I am trying to use this line from the documentation:

Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log

It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)

How can I make this line work ?

Soren
  66853   Wed Jul 21 16:38:05 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Re: Subst variables and Execute

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi

 

I am trying to use this line from the documentation:

Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log

It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)

How can I make this line work ?

Soren

Have you started the server with the "-x" flag as written in the documentation? 

  66855   Thu Jul 22 10:17:29 2010 Reply soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Re: Subst variables and Execute

Stefan Ritt wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi

 

I am trying to use this line from the documentation:

Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log

It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)

How can I make this line work ?

Soren

Have you started the server with the "-x" flag as written in the documentation? 

 Thanks a lot for replying despite the heat. Yes, I executed with the "-x" flag.

It is just a quoting problem, I guess. This line works:

Execute new = echo New message with ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host >> /tmp/elog.log

It evaluates to:

SHELL "echo New message with ID 24706 of type elogtype from Soren Poulsen on 137.138.22.11 >> /tmp/elog.log"
 

So next step is to replace "new" with "edit" and "delete".

That works as well.

Soren

 

 

  66856   Thu Jul 22 15:51:50 2010 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Re: drop in replacement for FCKeditor?

Bill Pier wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Bill Pier wrote:

Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor? 

What is a drop-in replacement? 

 A configuration option to specify a different/alternate javascript based editor.

 There is an firefox addon "It's all text" that allows you to call your own editor for all textarea fields in the browser.

If you then choose "plain" or "ELCode" encoding in ELOG for a new entry or to modifiy an existing entry, you can use your favourite editor to edit the entry by an new "EDIT" button associated with the textarea input field. It works simply by temporary files.

Not really a "drop-in" replacement, but similar.

 

  66858   Mon Jul 26 11:41:44 2010 Reply soren poulsensoren.poulsen@cern.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Re: Subst variables and Execute

soren poulsen wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

soren poulsen wrote:

Hi

 

I am trying to use this line from the documentation:

Execute new = echo "New message wiht ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host" >> /tmp/elog.log

It does not seem to have the intended effect (of printing a line with the message id, etc in the file /tmp/elog.log
)

How can I make this line work ?

Soren

Have you started the server with the "-x" flag as written in the documentation? 

 Thanks a lot for replying despite the heat. Yes, I executed with the "-x" flag.

It is just a quoting problem, I guess. This line works:

Execute new = echo New message with ID $message id of type $type from $long_name on $remote_host >> /tmp/elog.log

It evaluates to:

SHELL "echo New message with ID 24706 of type elogtype from Soren Poulsen on 137.138.22.11 >> /tmp/elog.log"
 

So next step is to replace "new" with "edit" and "delete".

That works as well.

Soren

 

 

There is sometimes a problem with substitutions like "Execute delete = echo $message id".

It seems the problem is that if you delete a logbook entry that is not created with the current logbook attributes, the substitution variables are replaced with the variable name, and not the variable value.

In this example, according to the log file it becomes SHELL "message id" instead of SHELL "234", if the logbook entry is 234.

Soren

  66865   Wed Jul 28 17:08:55 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.8Re: Subst variables and Execute

soren poulsen wrote:

There is sometimes a problem with substitutions like "Execute delete = echo $message id".

It seems the problem is that if you delete a logbook entry that is not created with the current logbook attributes, the substitution variables are replaced with the variable name, and not the variable value.

In this example, according to the log file it becomes SHELL "message id" instead of SHELL "234", if the logbook entry is 234.

Soren

I tried to reproduce it, but it always worked for me. So I need a step-by-step instruction from you on how to reproduce the problem, ideally starting from the demo logbook from the distribution. Only if I can reproduce the problem, I will be able to fix it. 

  66867   Wed Jul 28 17:21:31 2010 Question Bryan Moffitmoffit@jlab.orgQuestionLinux2.7.8-2278Disable forward/backward navigation keystrokes?

I wondered if there was a config line that enabled/disabled the forward and backward navigation keystrokes that were implemented in 2.7.0?

The current definitions (Control-PgUp/PgDown/Home/End) interfere with those keys I use to navigate between tabs in Firefox.  It'd be nice if they could either be turned off.. or redefined.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6