ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
937
|
Sat Feb 12 20:11:48 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: Help with configuration newbie |
> 1. When replying to another reply in a thread, the author_name attribute is
> not substitued (as desired). Since this is a mandatory field, we are not
> able to send the reply message. However, reply to the originial message
> works fine.
Preset on reply Author = $long_name
Do not use "Remove on reply".
> 2. "Use Email From = string" prepends an additional "" to the "From"
> field in the e-mails.
This has been fixed recently, please update.
> 3. "Fixed Attributes Reply = Subject" fixes the subject line while replying.
> However when we add "Category" attribute to this list, it breaks.
I tried to use your config file and add
Fixed attributes reply = Subject, Category
and it worked as expected. What kind of "break" did you observe? |
938
|
Sat Feb 12 20:51:43 2005 |
| Anand Sengupta | anandss@iucaa.ernet.in | Question | Linux | | Re: Help with configuration newbie |
> > 1. When replying to another reply in a thread, the author_name attribute is
> > not substitued (as desired). Since this is a mandatory field, we are not
> > able to send the reply message. However, reply to the originial message
> > works fine.
>
> Preset on reply Author = $long_name
>
> Do not use "Remove on reply".
This worked. Thanks.
>
> > 2. "Use Email From = string" prepends an additional "" to the "From"
> > field in the e-mails.
>
> This has been fixed recently, please update.
Agani, thanks for the information.
>
> > 3. "Fixed Attributes Reply = Subject" fixes the subject line while replying.
> > However when we add "Category" attribute to this list, it breaks.
>
> I tried to use your config file and add
>
> Fixed attributes reply = Subject, Category
>
> and it worked as expected. What kind of "break" did you observe?
For me, when I put the Category in the fixed attributes for reply, I see the
Category but when I actually try to send the message - it says Category not
entered. I am sure I am doing something very stupid. Please help.
- Anand. |
939
|
Sun Feb 13 16:43:05 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: Help with configuration newbie |
> For me, when I put the Category in the fixed attributes for reply, I see the
> Category but when I actually try to send the message - it says Category not
> entered. I am sure I am doing something very stupid. Please help.
No, it was a bug, which I could reproduce now. I fixed it in revision 1.554. It will
be contained in the next release. |
65833
|
Thu Apr 17 08:27:27 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Help me please I can't uplode Attach file |
Samrit wrote: |
Dear All
I can't uplode Attach file. It have Error
Error: Filename "D:\aaa.doc" contains invalid character |
Please use your browser's back button to go back |
Thank you very much
Joe..
|
The problematic part is the "\" in the filename, which is not correctly recognized as a directory. I will fix this in the next release. For now, just click on the Browse button, navigate to d:\, and then select there the file aaa.doc. |
65885
|
Sun May 18 06:20:00 2008 |
| Mark Soohoo | marksoohoo@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.3-2095 | Re: Help me please I can't uplode Attach file |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Samrit wrote: |
Dear All
I can't uplode Attach file. It have Error
Error: Filename "D:\aaa.doc" contains invalid character |
Please use your browser's back button to go back |
Thank you very much
Joe..
|
The problematic part is the "\" in the filename, which is not correctly recognized as a directory. I will fix this in the next release. For now, just click on the Browse button, navigate to d:\, and then select there the file aaa.doc.
|
Hi, I'm having the same problem, too, when attempting to upload an attachment. I'm using version 2.7.3-2095.
I wasn't able to attach an image by clicking on the Browse button, clicking on the desired file, hitting the Open button, and then hitting the Upload button. I just noticed that I could upload my error screen to this forum:
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Mark

|
2144
|
Tue Feb 20 21:10:28 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | Linux | 2.6.4 | Re: Hardcoded Path in Makefile |
Martin Killenberg wrote: | I tried to compile ELOG on Scientific Linux Cern 4.4 and found that make quits because uname is not located in /usr/bin (like it is hardcoded in the makefile) but in /bin.
Later I found that this is only the case in the svn version, in the "latest.tar.gz" from 2007/02/20 the path is /bin.
Why do you have the absolute path in the Makefile? uname should be in the default path on any system. (The same applies to "rm")
I also was confused that you only provide one rpm Package (except for debian) without mentioning for which distribution. You try to avoid dependencies, but the elogd is linked against the basic libraries libc and ld-linux, which might vary. |
Ups. The hard-coded /usr/uname somehow sneaked in from some temporary test. I removed it in the current SVN.
Indeed the RPM package I provide is built under Scientific Linux. The Debian port is done by someone else. Unfortunately I don't have ten boxes with all possible distributions laying around, so my possibilities are quite limited and I depend on third party help. If you want to contribute additional RPMs you are welcome. |
67269
|
Thu May 10 15:34:39 2012 |
| Yoshio Imai | $user_email | Question | Linux | 2.9.0 | Re: HW Requirements to run elog / Performance issues running on ARM |
Hi!
Looking at your config file it seems that a lot of the attributes are not user-specified but rather auto-generated content. You may want to consider using the elog client to submit such entries; this might avoid performance issues related to communication of the server with the web browser used for entry generation. This way, event entries can even be automatically created by other software rather than having a user to submit them.
Yoshio |
67270
|
Thu May 10 16:35:50 2012 |
| Tim Thiel | tt2005@thieleng.com | Question | Linux | 2.9.0 | Re: HW Requirements to run elog / Performance issues running on ARM |
Yoshio Imai wrote: |
Hi!
Looking at your config file it seems that a lot of the attributes are not user-specified but rather auto-generated content. You may want to consider using the elog client to submit such entries; this might avoid performance issues related to communication of the server with the web browser used for entry generation. This way, event entries can even be automatically created by other software rather than having a user to submit them.
Yoshio
|
Yoshio,
Thanks for the suggestion.
We have actually tried running the elog server with a very minimal set of attributes, all of which were human entries, and still had response times that were entirely unacceptable. So, unfortunately this path won't solve all our issues.
tt
|