Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 20:13:28 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
<br>
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 13:11:30 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
<br>
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:40:55 2005
|
| I added ths missing tags. The validator at least does not complain any more. |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 11:23:44 2005
|
> > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> <br>
> > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 12:44:29 2005
|
> > > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> > <br>
> > > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 12:45:02 2005
|
> > > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> > <br>
> > > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 2 17:31:33 2005
|
> > I tried to substitute avery occurrence of hard coded "&" with "&" but it does
> > not do the job at all ... infact the first time the HTML code is ok, but
> > following a link let the browser to automatically decode html entities .. and
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 13:21:28 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.
Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
here is an example
of your online Demo elog:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920 |