Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 492 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon2.gif   Re: Executing a shell command using elogd Windows service, posted by Frank Baptista on Sat Nov 30 15:46:16 2019 

Well, there I was, eating Thanksgiving dinner, when suddenly, it hit me (no, not indigestion).  I can write a simple program that parses out the latest "Status" from the most recent logbook file -- a relatively easy task, since it's a text file.  This solution avoids having to execute a shell command at all.  GOOOOOOAAAAAAL!!! smiley

As always, I appreciate all your help...can't thank you enough!

All the best,
Frank

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Wow, having these color signal lamps really looke like a cute solution, made me laugh.

No, there is no other way than the Execute new thing. I have given up long time ago to use Windows services, because they are very hard to debug and very limited. So at our site everything runs under Linux.

Have you tried to specify the explicit path of your log file? Like Execute new = echo $Status > C:\Path\Last_status.log

Best,
Stefan

Frank Baptista wrote:

Sorry -- I somehow selected the wrong OS in my original message. Asleep at the wheel again.

Frank Baptista wrote:

Greetings!

We've been successfully running nearly a dozen separate logbooks on independent laptops -- all of them are running elogd as a Windows service. This works well, since I've also set up auto recovery options in the event that the service inadvertently stops.

Now, I have a need to place the value of an attribute of the latest log entry into a basic text file.  Of course, this works just fine if I have launched elogd -x as a normal executable, using
Execute new = echo $Status > Last_status.log in my CFG file.  However, I would like to be able to do this using the Windows service which is running in the background. 

Is there another way to write the value of an attribute into a separate file?  If not, do I have to have a special build of ELOG in order to be able to enable the Windows service to execute shell commands?  For the record, these logbooks are running on secure laptops that are isolated onto their own network, and the user is unable to edit the CFG file.

In case you're wondering about the reason for the separate text file -- I've written a separate program which illuminates one of 4 different color signal lamps (mounted on a test station), based on the latest "Status" of the test station. (Running, Idle, Broken, Other).

I appreciate any guidance here -- this is a "big deal" here, as one glance over the floor gives us an idea of what's running (or not).

Thanks!
Frank

 

 

 

    icon2.gif   Re: How to selectively use Top/Bottom Text JavaScript., posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 4 10:15:56 2019 

In JS, you have access to the browser URL via window.location. So you can write conditional code depending on the actual elog command.

Stefan

John wrote:

I think I know what the answer(s) will be already.. that I will need to address this in JS. I don't want each screen to run/show the same code, other than the ones I want to.  AND I do not want to have to create a custom form for each 'menu option' to achieve this (if possible).

Thanx,

John

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Change column width in list mode?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 4 10:37:32 2019 

You need

.listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   min-width: 250px;
}

/Stefan

David Wallis wrote:

In some of our logbooks, some columns are very narrow, which makes their content difficult to read. I have tried adding a custom css file like this:

listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   width: 250px;
}

But I find that the column width does not change. I have verified via element inspection that the width attribute is active on the correct column (td).

Am I doing someting wrong, or is this not possible?

 

    icon2.gif   Re: How to selectively use Top/Bottom Text JavaScript., posted by John on Wed Dec 4 20:39:41 2019 

Wow thanks again Stefan for your kind and prompt responses!!

John

Stefan Ritt wrote:

In JS, you have access to the browser URL via window.location. So you can write conditional code depending on the actual elog command.

Stefan

John wrote:

I think I know what the answer(s) will be already.. that I will need to address this in JS. I don't want each screen to run/show the same code, other than the ones I want to.  AND I do not want to have to create a custom form for each 'menu option' to achieve this (if possible).

Thanx,

John

 

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Change column width in list mode?, posted by David Wallis on Fri Dec 6 15:40:19 2019 

Awesome, thank you!

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You need

.listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   min-width: 250px;
}

/Stefan

David Wallis wrote:

In some of our logbooks, some columns are very narrow, which makes their content difficult to read. I have tried adding a custom css file like this:

listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   width: 250px;
}

But I find that the column width does not change. I have verified via element inspection that the width attribute is active on the correct column (td).

Am I doing someting wrong, or is this not possible?

 

 

    icon2.gif   Re: text wrapping broken in firefox, posted by Devin Bougie on Thu Dec 19 16:40:10 2019 
As an example, I created this same entry in the demo logbook using Safari.  As you can see there, the message is wrapped at the width that I set the text entry box.

https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/9

> When creating new logbook entries, recent versions of firefox somehow ignore the message width setting.
> 
> For example, configure a logbook with:
> Message Width = 76
> Message Height = 20
> 
> Then, create a new plain text entry that contains very long lines.  The text entry box is the correct size, but once you hit submit and view the full display of the message, it is not wrapped properly.  The summary display is wrapped properly, but not the full display.
> 
> We've only found this to be a problem with recent versions of firefox.  Chromium, Safari, and old versions of firefox behave properly.
    icon2.gif   Re: PAM authentication question, posted by Jan Christoph Terasa on Thu Dec 19 17:46:33 2019 

Hi David,

sorry for the delay, I currently am very busy with other important work-related business, I hope I can find some time to look into this during christmas holiday season.

 

Have nice holidays,

Christoph

David Wallis wrote:

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for looking into this, if you can enable PAM + File, our users would be very happy!

The pam.d issue is probably related to CentOS/Red Hat, since our PAM expert warned me that it might be necessary.

Jan Christoph Terasa wrote:
David Wallis wrote:

I'm testing the PAM authentication feature, and have a couple questions, a suggestion, and a comment.

First the comment... it was pretty easy to get working, and is exactly what we need here, so thanks! Our PAM stack here is designed to allow logins with Active Directory, LDAP, or local accounts, so the PAM option preserves all of that.

The suggestion: In order to make it work, I had to add a symbolic link in /etc/pam.d:
    elogd -> system-auth
That might be considered for addition to the documentation (this was on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7)

The questions:

  1. The docs indicate that "Self register" must be set to >= 1, but in the code (elogd.c, line 26453), if the PAM module is enabled, Self register is overriden to 0. The result is that no "register as new user" link is displayed on the login screen. Is that the intent?
  2. Related... can PAM and File authentication both be enabled? We have some logbooks that are used by both internal people (with an A/D account) and outside collaborators that get local elog accounts. This works with LDAP + File, can it work with PAM?

Thanks in advance!

 

David, thank you for reporting on your findings regarding the PAM feature. I will look into the points you mentioned:

0. On my machines (Debian testing and stable) I did not have to add anything to /etc/pam.d, but apparently Debian just uses implicit defaults then, and REHL might insist on using excplicit settings. Adding a hint in the documentation is certainly useful, thank your for the suggestion. Maybe elog should provide a pam.d config file (which can be installed/adapted by package maintainers for various OSes).

1.+2. If I remember correctly, I intentionally disabled registration when using the PAM backend, because users will register using their passwd/LDAP/NIS users, and new users can only be regustered using the appropriate tools for the authentication mechanism used. This might not be correctly reflected in the docs, I will check that. In the light of question 2., I can also re-investigate that policy, so that logins will check against both the elog user database and PAM. Self-registering can then be enabled again, and new registrees will go to the elog database. I will try to bringthe code in line with how LDAP works.

 

regards,

Christoph

 

 

    icon2.gif   Re: CSS for HTML Mails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 22 16:35:47 2020 

The CSS has been embedded in the email end of 2018, so just upgrade your server.

https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/5165daf35cc1fb066071827719079fe0c9aa5ffb

/Stefan

Daniel Pfuhl wrote:

Hi there,

we extensively use Logbuch as a change documentation platform.

E-Mail notifications for new entries are very important for us.

Since we store sensible data in our logbooks the server is protected by a firewall.

After the firewall was activated the HTML mails are not rendered by the Outlook Mail clients we use - when they are located in an "external" net behind the firewall. I assume that's because of the css stylesheet which is linked in the source code of the HTML mail.

Is there any chance to include the CSS information in the HTML code? Otherwise we would need to make the CSS accessable from anywhere which requires in turn that the path of the CSS file can be customized.

Any idea how to solved this issue?

Best regards,

daniel

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6