... subject erased ..., posted by Stefano Lacaprara on Thu Apr 16 11:12:32 2020
|
> I found two potential memory leaks which I fixed in the git version, so you can try again.
Just tested, and it works! Many thanks for very quick patch!
|
|
Re: CSS for HTML Mails, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 21 09:13:45 2020
|
Hi Stefan,
I pulled the code from the repository but was not able to build it.
Sorry, I'm not a developer. Is there a good documentation you can recommend on how to do this for a Windows installation incl. how to setup |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Sun May 3 18:05:32 2020
|
Hi,
I've had problems in the past due to a dodgy pointer creating branches despite a "No branches" in the configuration file.
It would be very interesting to see what the 200428a.log file looks like with these entries: in the screenshot they appear to be shown in time order, but |
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by Frank Baptista on Sun May 3 22:43:12 2020 
|
Hi David,
Thanks for the quick response! Well, I'd have to say that the sequence is as tangled as it looks in the logbook -- I've attached
a copy of the log file for your reading pleasure. |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Mon May 4 14:55:53 2020
|
Hi Frank,
There are two interesting points about the log file.
1. Entry 5658 is timestamped later than 5659, but is earlier in the entry list. It also is "In Reply to" 5659. despite |
|
How to prevent file path leaks on a 404 page, posted by Rich Loring on Tue May 12 15:47:33 2020
|
Hello,
We used the Elog RPM binary installation method to install Elog. Our security scanners are complaining that Elog discloses the version information
when you hit a missing page (404 error). How can I hide this version info? Is there a snippet of code somewhere that I can comment out? |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by Frank Baptista on Fri May 22 21:03:05 2020
|
Hi David,
Well, you've made some very interesting observations, and raised some excellent questions. So, I went back and did some homework, reviewing
a number of logbooks to find instances where this strange 'record twist' occurs. You had asked, "Do you have enough information to decided |
|
Re: Record ID corruption, posted by David Pilgram on Sat May 23 16:15:38 2020
|
Hi Frank,
Good bit of detective work. To me it suggests that something as yet undetermined occurs, that, when the 57th reply happens, causes the
issue. If that "something" hasn't happened, all is well. Apart from Heinz varieties (not true, in fact), 57 isn't an obvious |