Re: elog submit without user and password, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 9 10:58:18 2002
|
> With elog it is possible to submit messages to a password protected
> logbook without specifying the -u option. I.e. NO PASSWORD is
> necessary to submit a message. I assume it is related to the problem
|
|
Re: elog submit without user and password, posted by H. Scheit on Tue Jul 9 15:28:33 2002
|
> > With elog it is possible to submit messages to a password protected
> > logbook without specifying the -u option. I.e. NO PASSWORD is
> > necessary to submit a message. I assume it is related to the problem
|
|
Re: elog submit without user and password, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 10 08:53:21 2002
|
> I guess it cannot and doesn't have to be 100% save. Maybe if the web
> interface is used for a new message a long random number (let's call
> it newID) can be included, which elog remembers for some time (say 1
|
|
Re: a bug and a question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 11 10:36:09 2002
|
> If you have only one entry in the logbook and have it set up in threaded
> mode like: ?cmd=Search&mode=threaded&reverse=1, when you click on the icon
> of the entry or the number of the entry to see it, it does not allow you
|
|
Re: last x link TEXT, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jul 12 10:26:40 2002
|
> The last x link TEXT now shows up like this
>
> 'Last 20 entries?mode=threaded'
|
|
Re: Reverse sort, threaded display fails when there is only 1 entry in logbook, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jul 17 14:53:18 2002
|
>
>
> This is not a serious bug...but when the global settings are as follows
|
|
Re: Port specification with -p fails (SOLVED, more or less), posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 23 09:12:14 2002
|
> > Anyone seen similar problems?
> Probably not if you read the config file, 'cause I didn't. Shame on me...
>
|
|
Re: change the Email From address used when sending notifications, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jul 23 09:16:01 2002
|
> Is there a way to change the From address used when sending notifications
> from ELOG? I was hoping there might be another attribute that would go
> along with the smtp host section.
|