| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1243
|
Fri Jul 8 13:32:56 2005 |
 | Tim Iskander | tim.iskander@criticallink.com | Request | All | 2.5.8 | Re: Request: can the comment for a log book be put in the status bar on hover |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Tim Iskander wrote: | We have several logbooks running here with somewhat cryptic names. The comment field for the
logbook describes its intent well enough, so the thought was that the comment could show up in the
status bar (or tooltip) when you hover over the logbook name in the tabs at the top of the page. |
_X_ yea 
___ nea 
I added a tooltip to the logbook showing the comment field. The status bar is a bit difficult since it requires Javascript and is not supported by all browsers. But I hope the tooltip is good enough. The modification is in CVS, you can try it at the forum.
- Stefan |
I like it!
thanks...
/Tim |
|
67236
|
Wed Apr 11 13:09:56 2012 |
 | Thomas Kleeb | thomas.kleeb@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1-243 | Kerberos authentication |
Hello to @all
First please let me say that I'm a complete green-horn when it comes to linux 
I'm running elog on a linux virtual server and would like to use kerberos authentication. If I set 'Authentication = Kerberos' in the elogd.cfg file I get,
If I set 'Authentication = Kerberos, File' it works fine. I hope this is just some error on my part.
thanks,
Tom |
|
67238
|
Wed Apr 11 13:42:29 2012 |
 | Thomas Kleeb | thomas.kleeb@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1-243 | Re: Kerberos authentication |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Thomas Kleeb wrote: |
|
Hello to @all
First please let me say that I'm a complete green-horn when it comes to linux
I'm running elog on a linux virtual server and would like to use kerberos authentication. If I set 'Authentication = Kerberos' in the elogd.cfg file I get,
If I set 'Authentication = Kerberos, File' it works fine. I hope this is just some error on my part.
thanks,
Tom
|
Is Kerberos set up correctly on your PC? What is the Kerberos Realm? Does the command "kinit <your user name>" work correctly? If not, you have to install and configure Kerberos correctly. Make sure to have USE_KRB5 turned on in your Makefile.
|
Thanks for the quick reply! 
I downloaded and installed the latest RPM. Is Kerberos used in the RPM? The command "kinit xxxxxxx"requests my password and then returns to the prompt. I believe that the virtual server is a normal PSI linux, but I'm not 100% sure  |
|
67240
|
Wed Apr 11 14:00:52 2012 |
| Thomas Kleeb | thomas.kleeb@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1-243 | Re: Kerberos authentication |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Thomas Kleeb wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Thomas Kleeb wrote: |
|
Hello to @all
First please let me say that I'm a complete green-horn when it comes to linux
I'm running elog on a linux virtual server and would like to use kerberos authentication. If I set 'Authentication = Kerberos' in the elogd.cfg file I get,
If I set 'Authentication = Kerberos, File' it works fine. I hope this is just some error on my part.
thanks,
Tom
|
Is Kerberos set up correctly on your PC? What is the Kerberos Realm? Does the command "kinit <your user name>" work correctly? If not, you have to install and configure Kerberos correctly. Make sure to have USE_KRB5 turned on in your Makefile.
|
Thanks for the quick reply!
I downloaded and installed the latest RPM. Is Kerberos used in the RPM? The command "kinit xxxxxxx"requests my password and then returns to the prompt. I believe that the virtual server is a normal PSI linux, but I'm not 100% sure
|
Kerberos is not used in the RPM. You have to compile yourself from the tar ball.
|
O.K.
Like I said in the beginning, I'm a linux green-horn  How do I stop the elogd daemon, and do I have to delete all the elog files and directories created by the RPM or can I just follow the instructions for the tar file and install / make over the RPM installation? |
|
67242
|
Wed Apr 11 14:36:43 2012 |
| Thomas Kleeb | thomas.kleeb@psi.ch | Question | Linux | V2.9.1-243 | Re: Kerberos authentication |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Thomas Kleeb wrote: |
|
Like I said in the beginning, I'm a linux green-horn How do I stop the elogd daemon, and do I have to delete all the elog files and directories created by the RPM or can I just follow the instructions for the tar file and install / make over the RPM installation?
|
/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd stop
Just compile elogd with Kerberos support and copy it over the existing elogd daemon.
|
I think it's working now !!!!
Thanks
Tom |
|
67243
|
Wed Apr 11 16:32:22 2012 |
| Thomas Kleeb | thomas.kleeb@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.1-2435 | SSL |
I'm slowly able to see the finish line 
Now all I need to do is get SSL to work. My server name is hf-info-elog and I'm not sure what the correct values for Port= and URL= should be.
thank
Tom (the green-horn) |
|
66737
|
Thu Mar 11 12:01:35 2010 |
| Thomas | theitz@gmx.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Summary text field is empty for replied entries |
It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?
Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.
|
|
66739
|
Thu Mar 11 15:29:40 2010 |
| Thomas | theitz@gmx.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Re: Summary text field is empty for replied entries |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Thomas wrote: |
|
It is possible to show the (new) text of a replied entry in the summary text field ?
Actually only for the original entries the text was shown in the text column of the summary report, not for the replies.
|
In principle you can adjust the number of lines shown in the summary text file with the option summary lines = x. If you increase that value, you start seeing some part of the reply. For elog itself it is impossible to distinguish the reply text from the origial text, since some people use plain text like
> original
> text
reply
with the reply sometimes below, sometimes above the original text. Other people use full HTML with tables (like in this forum), where it is very hard internally to distinguish between original and reply text. The easiest is not to quote the original text in replies, then you will see it always.
|
Thank you very much for your answer.
Is there any way to invert the order of the original text and the reply text ? |