ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
2177
|
Tue Mar 27 13:57:44 2007 |
 | Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Global "MOptions" |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | | Would it be an option to have Global "MOptions" - perhaps configured in the 'global options' file - which can be called up and referenced in all logbooks? |
Sure, that's possible already with the current version. Just put your MOptions statement under [global] and it will be used in all logbooks. If a specific logbook uses different MOptions, put the a second MOptions list under that logbook's section and it will overwrite the global setting. |
Perfect! Works a treat (I promise to read the manual next time!)
Cheers
Fergus |
|
2176
|
Mon Mar 26 13:03:05 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Re: Global "MOptions" |
| Fergus Lynch wrote: | | Would it be an option to have Global "MOptions" - perhaps configured in the 'global options' file - which can be called up and referenced in all logbooks? |
Sure, that's possible alreay with the current version. Just put your MOptions statement under [global] and it will be used in all logbooks. If a specific logbook uses different MOptions, put the a second MOptions list under that logbook's section and it will overwrite the global setting. |
|
2175
|
Mon Mar 26 11:45:07 2007 |
 | Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Request | Windows | ELOG V2.6. | Global "MOptions" |
Hi,
We have ELOG configured for virtually every conceivable use in our IT Operation dept and it is fantastically useful and easy to use. One result of this - naturally! - is that we have quiet a few logbooks.
Many of these logbooks share the same attributes - especially Moptions for equipment lists - which is fine but requires manually copying and pasting Moption lists into multiple logbooks to keep everything synchronized.
Would it be an option to have Global "MOptions" - perhaps configured in the 'global options' file - which can be called up and referenced in all logbooks?
Just an idea -
Cheers
Fergus |
|
2174
|
Wed Mar 21 16:51:14 2007 |
| deletoille | xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Question | Linux | Windows | 6.4-1802 | Re: sort attributs |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| deletoille wrote: |
For 1 event, I need the date and the hour of this one. An event can be enter in elog several days after this one. The problem is that I do not manage to carry out one sorts on these two attibuts. I tested the order “? rsort” but this one works only on one entry not out of 2 at the same time (? rsort=Heure+evenement, Date+evenement&mode=threaded)
have an easy way? |
Yepp. Since you can only sort on a single attribute, you combine time and date into one. This can be done like following:
Attributes = Icone, Type def fiche, ..., Evenement
Type Evenement = datetime
Now you can not only sort on Evenement, but you get also a date picker for that attribute in the entry form. To format the way Evenement is displayed, use the Time format option. |
thanks, It works but the order "?sort" seems to works only in summary view (attachment 1) and not in threaded (attachement 2) view.
Any idea? |
| Attachment 1: summary.JPG
|
|
| Attachment 2: threaded.JPG
|
|
|
2173
|
Tue Mar 20 14:42:05 2007 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54@dl.ac.uk | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1739 | Re: Private logbook - no guest access? |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Ben Shepherd wrote: | | I want to set up a logbook which you have to be logged in to be able to read entries. I've already got three logbooks which can be viewed by anyone but only logged-in users can modify them. For the fourth one, I want to have a private logbook which can't be read by 'guest' users. Is this possible? |
Per default, logbooks can only be read by logged in users if you use "password file = xxx". It is however possible to make these logbooks readable by 'guest' users if you use "Guest menu commands = xxx" and "Guest list menu commands = xxx". So just remove these two options from your fourth logbook and you get what you want. |
Thanks! I actually saw that in the config documentation, but I had assumed that it didn't work. Turns out I'd left those two options in my [global] section as well. Oops! |
|
2172
|
Tue Mar 20 13:48:50 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1739 | Re: Private logbook - no guest access? |
| Ben Shepherd wrote: | | I want to set up a logbook which you have to be logged in to be able to read entries. I've already got three logbooks which can be viewed by anyone but only logged-in users can modify them. For the fourth one, I want to have a private logbook which can't be read by 'guest' users. Is this possible? |
Per default, logbooks can only be read by logged in users if you use "password file = xxx". It is however possible to make these logbooks readable by 'guest' users if you use "Guest menu commands = xxx" and "Guest list menu commands = xxx". So just remove these two options from your fourth logbook and you get what you want. |
|
2171
|
Tue Mar 20 13:45:20 2007 |
 | Ben Shepherd | bjs54'at'dl'dot'ac'dot'uk | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1739 | Private logbook - no guest access? |
Hi,
I want to set up a logbook which you have to be logged in to be able to read entries. I've already got three logbooks which can be viewed by anyone but only logged-in users can modify them. For the fourth one, I want to have a private logbook which can't be read by 'guest' users. Is this possible?
cheers
ben |
|
2170
|
Mon Mar 19 19:51:26 2007 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 6.4-1802 | Re: submit modified elog entry |
| deletoille wrote: | hello, I have small a bug,
when I create an entry. Per moment the program requires of me: "Submit modified Elog entry"
if I answer yes, Eog create 2 entry identical.
If I answer not it create only one.
I don't wait that elog asks me a confirmation
|
Are you sure about that? Can you reproduce it? I tried to reproduce it with the simple example logbook from the distribution, by adding the Use lock = 1 option to the configuration, but without success. I got only a single entry or no entry. You can of course remove the Use lock option, if you don't need locking. |