| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1883
|
Mon Jul 17 13:49:37 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Comment | Linux | 2.6.2-1706 | Re: Duplicate of a reply should be a reply |
| Gerald Ebberink wrote: | Hello everybody
This weekend I found that if I duplicate a reply it does not become a reply it self.
Is this on purpouse?
I have been through the source a little (not much time for that) and I can not find a reason where the "in reply to" value is dropped.
Could anyone give me an pointer? |
This is on purpuse. The Duplicate functionality is ment to "clone" an existing entry, to save some typing work if an existing entry contains most of what one wants in a new entry. If one duplicates a reply, it is detached from the original thread, so there is not entry to attach the duplicate to. I guess you want to make a new reply to an existing entry, and then have another existing reply as a template for that, but this is not possible. If I would not drop the "in reply to" value, the duplicate would point to the wrong entry. |
|
1882
|
Mon Jul 17 13:44:37 2006 |
 | Gerald Ebberink | g.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nl | Comment | Linux | 2.6.2-1706 | Duplicate of a reply should be a reply |
Hello everybody
This weekend I found that if I duplicate a reply it does not become a reply it self.
Is this on purpouse?
I have been through the source a little (not much time for that) and I can not find a reason where the "in reply to" value is dropped.
Could anyone give me an pointer? |
|
1881
|
Mon Jul 17 13:20:07 2006 |
| Gerald Ebberink | g.h.p.ebberink@nclr.nl | Question | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: restrict access |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Gerald Ebberink wrote: | | As you can see, I have implemented a temporary fix in the way of allowing only certain hosts access. But where does this Internal error come from. |
I only can identify this error if you send me your current ("de-sensified") elogd.cfg. |
I have just installed the svn version of elog, and the problem has been fixed.
Thank you very much! |
|
1880
|
Sat Jul 15 17:58:46 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.2-1702 | Re: astonished icon |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | Hi Stefan,
I've been trying to use the astonished icon, but the preview or entry
display shows only a broken image.
I found in the elogd.c at line 5556 :
{"8o", "<img src=\"%sicons/eek.png\">"}
I copied the "astonished.png" to "eek.png" and it worked.
Is it the reason of the problem ? ?) |
Actually the C code should be "astonished.png" instead of "eek.png". I changed that in revision 1704. BTW, thanks for the Brazilian translation.  |
|
1879
|
Fri Jul 14 21:47:14 2006 |
 | Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.2-1702 | astonished icon |
Hi Stefan,
I've been trying to use the astonished icon, but the preview or entry
display shows only a broken image.
I found in the elogd.c at line 5556 :
{"8o", "<img src=\"%sicons/eek.png\">"}
I copied the "astonished.png" to "eek.png" and it worked.
Is it the reason of the problem ? ?)
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Elaine |
|
1878
|
Fri Jul 14 20:29:21 2006 |
 | Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos | elaine@ccuec.unicamp.br | Comment | Linux | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: Inserting images via Internet Explorer |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.
When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] . |
This is a problem of the JavaScript implementation of Internet Explorer. After some externsive research I found now a way to convince IE to do the right thing. The fix is contains in SVN revision 1701 and will be released with 2.6.2-2 soon. |
Great job !
I tried the SVN revision 1701, and it works perfectly.
Thank you for all your effort.
Regards,
Elaine |
|
1877
|
Thu Jul 13 15:25:44 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: Elogd.exe crashes on windows |
| Tim Fowler wrote: | I have elog setup to send emails based on the priority of one of the attributes. When a new entry is created, the emails are sent successfully, however if the entry is edited or if you changed the attribute, elogd.exe will crash with a memory access error.
I have tried this and received the same results on different computers and different versions on Elog down to versions 2/6.0 beta 5. (it works correctly in that version).
The attribute in question is setup something like below:
Attributes = Ticket #, Site, Shift, Type, Area, System Name, Description, Priority, Status, Total Down Time, Last Revision
...(omitted config)
Options Priority = High, Medium, Low
...(omitted config)
Use Email Subject = $Site -- $System Name $Description
Use Email From = testuser@myexample.com
;Send email if priority is set to high
Email Priority High = testuser2@myexample.com
Display Email recipients = 1
Email Format = 14 |
This problem has now been fixed in version 2.6.2. |
|
1876
|
Thu Jul 13 15:16:53 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.1-1681 | Re: Inserting images via Internet Explorer |
| Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos wrote: | I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.
When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag [IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG] . |
This is a problem of the JavaScript implementation of Internet Explorer. After some externsive research I found now a way to convince IE to do the right thing. The fix is contains in SVN revision 1701 and will be released with 2.6.2-2 soon. |