| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1711
|
Wed Feb 22 13:55:08 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | Re: List view for CHANGE attributes | > Hello @all,
> I've tried to implement an attribute with Change. The detail view works well,
> but in the list view the field is empty (see screen shots). Can somebody help me?
For the list view, you need an additional
List Change RIB-Admin = ...
Some people want different modes for the list view and the detail view, that's why there are two options. |
|
1710
|
Wed Feb 22 13:49:03 2006 |
 | Holger Mundhahs | holger.mundhahs@vtg-rail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | List view for CHANGE attributes | Hello @all,
I've tried to implement an attribute with Change. The detail view works well,
but in the list view the field is empty (see screen shots). Can somebody help me?
Regards
Holger
LOGBOOK CONFIGURATION:
Comment = DEMO
Attributes = Admin, Hostname, IP-Adresse, Funktion, RIB-Hostname, RIB-IP, RIB-Admin
Change RIB-Admin = <a href="https://$RIB-Hostname/" target="_new">$Hostname RIB-Board: $RIB-Hostname</a>
Preset Admin = DEMO
Locked Attributes = Admin, RIB-Admin
Display search = ID, Date, Admin, Hostname, RIB-Admin
List Display = ID, Edit, Date, Admin, Hostname, IP-Adresse, RIB-Admin
Link Display = ID
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Quick filter = Date, Admin
Default encoding = 1
Suppress default = 3
Show text = 0
Summary lines = 0
Sort Attributes = IP-Adresse |
|
1709
|
Wed Feb 22 11:05:15 2006 |
| Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | MOptions problem ? | Hi Stephan,
I have a unknown bug and need help  !
First, please take a look to attached screenshot
On the "elog problem1.gif" and "elog problem2.gif" there aren't any problem.
The entry "Mairie STO" appears correct but when I try to edit the "Equipment" field, the list/combo shows improper data.
I obtain "- please select -" instead of "RT0004"
What's the problem ?
Thanks a lot. |
|
1708
|
Tue Feb 21 22:37:14 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Re: svn revision number in the source |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have no idea how I got to CVS |
I realized that I had an old link to CVS when I checked your previous posting, so I updated that link like 30 min ago. That's why you got a new one. |
Ah, thanks. All is now right with the world  |
|
1707
|
Tue Feb 21 22:33:32 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Re: svn revision number in the source |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | I have no idea how I got to CVS |
I realized that I had an old link to CVS when I checked your previous posting, so I updated that link like 30 min ago. That's why you got a new one. |
|
1706
|
Tue Feb 21 22:13:40 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Re: svn revision number in the source |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | So, when we go to the download section and download directly from there, that is not "committed" source? I ask because the revision id there is not set to anything that I can see. |
Can you be a bit more specific? What do you download? The Windows binaries, the Linux RPM? Or from the Subversion repository? The current version in the repository, which you can download here, contains in the file elogd.c following line 8:
$Id: elogd.c 1660 2006-02-17 19:48:12Z ritt $
This tells you that this is revision 1660, committed on Feb. 17 by myself. So what is the problem? |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, this is really strange but just an hour ago I clicked on the http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download.html link and I was taken to a completely different webview - in fact, I am quite sure that at the bottom right corner it said "WebCVS"! Now, it says WebSVN and the revision info is in there. I've been trying to debug a problem with default.css and the elcode icons - and somewhere in there I cleared my firefox cache. Perhaps an old page was cached????
I have no idea how I got to CVS, and it make sense that CVS was not setting the SVN revision code.
Sorry to bother you on this. |
I just downloaded the tarball from SVN and the revision numbers are set correctly, as you said. I'm stumped as to how I got to CVS. I am running into issues that are related to the stylesheet properties, but that is for a different entry.
Thanks! |
|
|
1705
|
Tue Feb 21 21:58:16 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Re: svn revision number in the source |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | So, when we go to the download section and download directly from there, that is not "committed" source? I ask because the revision id there is not set to anything that I can see. |
Can you be a bit more specific? What do you download? The Windows binaries, the Linux RPM? Or from the Subversion repository? The current version in the repository, which you can download here, contains in the file elogd.c following line 8:
$Id: elogd.c 1660 2006-02-17 19:48:12Z ritt $
This tells you that this is revision 1660, committed on Feb. 17 by myself. So what is the problem? |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, this is really strange but just an hour ago I clicked on the http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download.html link and I was taken to a completely different webview - in fact, I am quite sure that at the bottom right corner it said "WebCVS"! Now, it says WebSVN and the revision info is in there. I've been trying to debug a problem with default.css and the elcode icons - and somewhere in there I cleared my firefox cache. Perhaps an old page was cached????
I have no idea how I got to CVS, and it make sense that CVS was not setting the SVN revision code.
Sorry to botter you on this. |
|
|
1704
|
Tue Feb 21 21:17:13 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.1 | Re: svn revision number in the source |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | So, when we go to the download section and download directly from there, that is not "committed" source? I ask because the revision id there is not set to anything that I can see. |
Can you be a bit more specific? What do you download? The Windows binaries, the Linux RPM? Or from the Subversion repository? The current version in the repository, which you can download here, contains in the file elogd.c following line 8:
$Id: elogd.c 1660 2006-02-17 19:48:12Z ritt $
This tells you that this is revision 1660, committed on Feb. 17 by myself. So what is the problem? |
|