Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 606 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show all entries    6454 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 605, 606, 607 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1665   Wed Feb 8 18:23:52 2006 Question Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionAll2.6.1Work on PAM Support?
Stefan (or any others):

Has anyone been seriously looking into building in PAM support in eLog? I ask because I have started reading the developer papers from Sun and looking at sample code.

Thanks

Steve
  1664   Wed Feb 8 18:19:02 2006 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
I have checked and can find no reference within Sun documents regarding the support of the forkpty() function. I have not been following elog development lately -- what is shell substitution supposed to buy us?


See the config manual and look for $shell



Steve Jones wrote:
Yep, I saw it. Thanks
  1663   Wed Feb 8 15:29:03 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux Re: email problems

Chris Warner wrote:
Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized or missing


There are two possible reasons:

1) The email address "christopher_warner@xxx.gov" is invalid. Some SMTP server immediately complain about invalid email addresses and refuse to send any mail then. In that case just supply an existing email address or remove that test account.

2) The SMTP server does not like the "SIZE=xxx" option. This comes from a single line in elogd.c:

snprintf(str, strsize - 1, "MAIL FROM: %s SIZE=%d\r\n", from, strlen(text));

you could just go there and remove the " SIZE=%d", so that the line looks like:

snprintf(str, strsize - 1, "MAIL FROM: %s\r\n", from);
to see if that makes any difference.
  1662   Wed Feb 8 11:56:02 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.6.1-1Re: Problem with MOptions

Ulrich Trüssel wrote:
After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions selection in my ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:

MOptions Test = Aa, Bb, Cc, Dd, Ee, Ff, Gg

Selecting: Bb, Cc, Gg

Submitting the entry form, autoreturn to the overview of the even made entry, only Bb was taken.

Any Idea what's happen? Did I miss something changing in 2.6.1-1 or may this be a bug? Thanks for ideas?

Would loke to upgreade to 2.6.1. in case of the new forms for long MOptions, but need to selct more than one!


That should work in 2.6.1-2 now.
  1661   Wed Feb 8 07:31:09 2006 Question Ulrich Trüsselulrich.truessel@familienhund.chQuestionWindows2.6.1-1Problem with MOptions
After upgrading to 2.6.1-1 (actually donwgraded in case of this problem to 2.6.0) i was not longer able to selct more than one MOptions selection in my ELOGs. Only the first slected selection was acepted by ELOG. Ex:

MOptions Test = Aa, Bb, Cc, Dd, Ee, Ff, Gg

Selecting: Bb, Cc, Gg

Submitting the entry form, autoreturn to the overview of the even made entry, only Bb was taken.

Any Idea what's happen? Did I miss something changing in 2.6.1-1 or may this be a bug? Thanks for ideas?

Would loke to upgreade to 2.6.1. in case of the new forms for long MOptions, but need to selct more than one!
  1660   Tue Feb 7 21:02:22 2006 Question Chris Warnerchristopher_warner@dcd.uscourts.govQuestionLinux email problems
When I select to get email notification on new logbook entries I receive this error when entering a new record.

Error sending Email via "xxx.xxx.xxx.xx": Syntax error, parameters in command "MAIL FROM: christopher_warner@xxx.gov SIZE=1985" unrecognized or missing

The user that sent the message was a test account that I set up. I entered the email address in the box provided and I am not sure what may be causing the difficulty.

Any thoughts as to what may be causing this?
  1659   Tue Feb 7 12:58:10 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.6.1-1637Re: Numbered lists get closed by </ul>

T. Ribbrock wrote:
I just ran into the following problem (and was able to reproduce it in the "demo" logbook on this site):

  • Create a new entry
  • Create a numbered list:
    [LIST=1]
[*] 1st entry
[*] 2nd entry
[/LIST]
  • In the resulting HTML code, the closing statement of that list translates to </ul> instead of </ol>, causing the list to remain open and all following text to be intented by the list indentation. This gets worse when several such lists are used in one document. I'll include an example below.

Numbered list follows:

  1. one
  2. two
  3. three

This text is indented, as the list was not closed properly.

  1. four
  2. five
  3. six

And now we have double indention...


I can't see any double indention there...

But seriously Wink I fixed that problem and updated this elog server already. It's in SVN revison 1653. The code now correctly chooses the proper </ul> or </ol>. What will not work however are nested lists, like an ordered list inside an unordere list, but that's anyhow very uncommon.
  1658   Mon Feb 6 17:15:11 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionOther2.6.1Re: sort after find

Willem Koster wrote:
Obviously I would like to be able to sort the result of a find-query.


That worked some time ago, but did not work currently. So I fixed that in the current SVN version.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 605, 606, 607 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6