Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 611 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments  Show only new entries    6460 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 610, 611, 612 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1650   Mon Feb 6 08:27:40 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform

Angus Au wrote:
ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found


The util library was added recently because of the new shell substitution functionaly, which requires the forkpty() function call. If you know in which library the forkpty is available on solaris, the makefile could be adjusted accordingly. If the forkpty is not available at all, we have to disable the shell substitution under solaris via conditional compilation.
  1649   Fri Feb 3 18:25:32 2006 Reply Dimitrios Tsirigkasdimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.chQuestionLinux2.6.1Re: elog allows me to create user "blahblah "
By the way, it is also possible to create a user that doesn't have a password! Shouldn't that be forbidden?

Dimitris
  1648   Fri Feb 3 18:15:47 2006 Question Dimitrios Tsirigkasdimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.chQuestionLinux2.6.1elog allows me to create user "blahblah "
Hi,

I noticed that when I register a username that contains whitespaces (eg "boing "), elog allows me to create the user of that name and updates the password file accordingly. It doesn't log me in, but it gives me no error message either. I also found that if I repeat the process it adds yet another entry in the password file, by the same name "boing ". Is that a bug or is there something wrong with my configuration?

Cheers,
Dimitris
  1647   Fri Feb 3 13:10:14 2006 Reply Willem KosterW.Koster@rc.rug.nlQuestionOther2.6.1Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform
[quote="Angus Au"]I came across problem in compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform.

Is there any fix ? I can compile elog 2.6.0 successfully on solaris.[/quote]

There is a fix, we have 2.6.1 running on Solaris.

A colleague of me installed it and did mention something about having to go through the source and adapting the 
makefile. I didn't hear him speak of missing libraries though, I will ask him next week.
  1646   Fri Feb 3 12:38:57 2006 Question Willem KosterW.Koster@rc.rug.nlQuestionOther2.6.1sort after find
When I do a find (like Field1 = XXX )
and then try to sort the results I get the entire list again (but sorted) instead of the sorted results.
But when I fabricate a url manually like

http://elog.com/Forum/?mode=summary&npp=990&Field1=XXX&sort=field2

I do get the search-results nicely sorted.

Obviously I would like to be able to sort the result of a find-query.

Is this a bug or a feature request ?
  1645   Fri Feb 3 11:54:22 2006 Disagree Willem KosterW.Koster@rc.rug.nlBug reportOther2.6.1[261] problem with month selection
I have several date-fields defined in my logboek. But when I click the icon and select another month the pop-up 
window get's filled  with the contants of the logboek instead of the date-selection.

Date format = %Y%m%d
  1644   Thu Feb 2 03:19:44 2006 Question Angus Auangus_au@promina.com.auQuestionOther2.6.1compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform
I came across problem in compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform.

The messages "

# make
gcc -o elog src/elog.c -lutil -lsocket -lnsl
ld: fatal: library -lutil: not found
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to elog
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `elog'

It seems to me that library libutil does not exist on solaris platform.

Is there any fix ? I can compile elog 2.6.0 successfully on solaris.
  1643   Mon Jan 30 16:26:08 2006 Warning T. Ribbrockemgaron@gmx.netBug reportLinux2.6.1-1637Numbered lists get closed by </ul>
I just ran into the following problem (and was able to reproduce it in the "demo" logbook on this site):

  • Create a new entry
  • Create a numbered list:
    [LIST=1]
[*] 1st entry
[*] 2nd entry
[/LIST]
  • In the resulting HTML code, the closing statement of that list translates to </ul> instead of </ol>, causing the list to remain open and all following text to be intented by the list indentation. This gets worse when several such lists are used in one document. I'll include an example below.

Numbered list follows:

  1. one
  2. two
  3. three

This text is indented, as the list was not closed properly.

  1. four
  2. five
  3. six

And now we have double indention...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 610, 611, 612 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6