Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 624 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject
  1286   Wed Jul 20 22:28:14 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinuxrev 1.703Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject               = <b>$subject</b>

the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions..


rev. 1.707 makes it work again Big grin
  1287   Wed Jul 20 22:39:05 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinuxrev 1.703Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject               = <b>$subject</b>

the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions..


this patch should fix the problem .. a little bug still remain, if you insert some allowed HTML tags in the subject this is detected by is_html() so the Display Attribute and the Link is not applied .. the result is that the HTML is working but no elog featur is applied


Your line
if (p && strchr(str, '>') && p >= str && *(p-1) != '\\')

in the code does not work. If the pattern is at the beginning of the string (p == str), then (p-1) points to an invalid location and can cause a segmentation fault. The correct patch is in CVS.
  1292   Thu Jul 21 10:59:22 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportAll Re: [code] should be a sort of <CDATA >

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
Using the [code] elocode should be intended also to preserve the tagged text from beeing parsed as html or elcode itself ..

this is an example:

Quote:
Note that, for security reasons, you should check the MD5 FINGERPRINT of the SSL certificate issued by the server agaist the following one:

MD5 Fingerprint = 23:A7:AD:33:3C:08:BE:2A:62:6E:85:DF:B8:00:23:40


Thank you


As you can see, your entry with the [code] section is now shown without interpretation. So everything between [code] and [/code] is not interpreted as ELCode tags. The modification is committed to CVS.


thanks Smile
  1293   Thu Jul 21 11:00:47 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportLinuxrev 1.703Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject               = <b>$subject</b>

the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions..


rev. 1.707 makes it work again Big grin


ok, nice Smile
  1294   Thu Jul 21 11:02:44 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportLinuxrev 1.703Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject               = <b>$subject</b>

the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions..


this patch should fix the problem .. a little bug still remain, if you insert some allowed HTML tags in the subject this is detected by is_html() so the Display Attribute and the Link is not applied .. the result is that the HTML is working but no elog featur is applied


Your line
if (p && strchr(str, '>') && p >= str && *(p-1) != '\\')

in the code does not work. If the pattern is at the beginning of the string (p == str), then (p-1) points to an invalid location and can cause a segmentation fault. The correct patch is in CVS.


ehhe, I used "should" infact Tongue
  1304   Sat Jul 23 16:45:28 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportAll Re: <img> in Display Attribute

Stefan Ritt wrote:

BTW: Conditional attributes now also work for email notifications, so you can do for example:
Attributes = Author, Category, Email encoding, Subject
Options Email encoding = plain{1}, HTML{2}
{1} Email encoding = 1
{2} Email encoding = 2


if one uses ROptions instead of a simple Options the text displaied is "plain{1}" (with the "{1}" not stripped out!!)
  1306   Sat Jul 23 18:30:57 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportAll Re: <img> in Display Attribute

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
if one uses ROptions instead of a simple Options the text displaied is "plain{1}" (with the "{1}" not stripped out!!)


Ok, fixed.
  1353   Thu Jul 28 01:02:00 2005 Warning John Habermannjohn.habermann@wilderness.org.auBug reportLinux 2.5.9+r16problem with list display attribute
I not sure if this has been found and fixed as I did find something to do with the list display attribute in the forums but wasn't sure if it was the same thing.

There seems to be a bug with the List Display attribute in that it drops the last attribute of the list. So in my example if I want to display the Subject in my list I have to add a dummy attribute after it otherwise the Subject will not be displayed. The comma after Subject is not enough, but all you have to do is to add 1 letter and then you will see the subject in List view. If you don't all I see is the Date and Author fields and then the Text field in my Summary view in the log book.

List Display = Date,Author,Subject,t

I am running elog 2.5.9+r1674-1 on Debian sarge.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6