Re: Auto-refresh ELog display, posted by Steve Jones on Thu Aug 24 19:28:35 2006
|
<html>
|
|
Re: Auto-refresh ELog display, posted by Alan Stone on Thu Aug 24 20:16:23 2006
|
I appreciate your posting of the JavaScript. However, I have no idea what
to do with it. The page appears to be generated by some elog daemon. I do
not know how to hook into that.
|
|
Re: Auto-refresh ELog display, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Aug 25 05:27:13 2006
|
eLog allows one to add custom headers or footers as well as include Cascading Style Sheets. I believe there is a post somewhere in here from Stefan indicating
that javascript can be added through one of these methods . . . hold on, a simple search, yes Stefan mentions it at http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1837
|
|
Re: Auto-refresh ELog display, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Sep 11 16:32:52 2006
|
[quote="Alan Stone"]We have multiple LCDs at a console, and usually one is dedicated to displaying a browser
with the local ELog. Meanwhile, others are making entries from another machine. If
no one clicks on refresh, the ELog display becomes stale. Is there a method to have
|
|
Re: Auto-increment substitutions broken with records for multiple days, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jun 25 10:09:18 2009
|
> An alternative patch:
>
> /* if date part matches */
|
|
Re: Auto-increment attributes, posted by Steve Williamson on Fri Dec 5 16:14:19 2008
|
Steve Williamson wrote:
We have an auto-incrementing reference attribute defined as: |
|
Re: Auto-increment attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Dec 8 10:09:14 2008
|
I finally found some time to address this problem. It is indeed related to the fact that the new number gets assigned when you click on 'New'.
So if two people edit the new entries at the same time, they get assigned the same number. To fix this problem, I made the tag generation work with the
'Subst' command, which is evaluated at the entry submission, and not when you click on 'New'. So to make this work, you need to upgrade |
|
Re: Auto-increment attributes, posted by Steve Williamson on Mon Dec 8 13:13:13 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
I finally found some time to address this problem. It is indeed related to the fact that the new number |