Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 654 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Datedown Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1299   Fri Jul 22 17:54:41 2005 Reply Juliana Pengjpeng@yorku.caRequestLinuxV2.6.0Re: hide attributes when view the logbook

Juliana Peng wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Juliana Peng wrote:
but it seems only effective when adding the new entry. All the attributes will show in logbook. Is there a way to hide some of the attributes? It would be good to let each user to choose what to see what not to see, create their own view. Can you put it on your to-do list or wishlist?


I implemented your request and committed to CVS. Please test if it does what you want, since I did not have much time to test it.


Thanks so much. But the new feature seems not working. If my conf is:

Options OS = SunOs{1}, Linux{2}, Aix
{1} Show Attributes = Name, SysAdmin, OS, Manufacturer, Model, Serial Number, Description

When I choose linux OS, is it supposed to get only the attributes in "Show Attributes"? All the attributes show up. Or you implemented it in other way?


Sorry, I mean choose SunOs
  1298   Fri Jul 22 17:21:15 2005 Reply Juliana Pengjpeng@yorku.caRequestLinuxV2.6.0Re: hide attributes when view the logbook

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Juliana Peng wrote:
but it seems only effective when adding the new entry. All the attributes will show in logbook. Is there a way to hide some of the attributes? It would be good to let each user to choose what to see what not to see, create their own view. Can you put it on your to-do list or wishlist?


I implemented your request and committed to CVS. Please test if it does what you want, since I did not have much time to test it.


Thanks so much. But the new feature seems not working. If my conf is:

Options OS = SunOs{1}, Linux{2}, Aix
{1} Show Attributes = Name, SysAdmin, OS, Manufacturer, Model, Serial Number, Description

When I choose linux OS, is it supposed to get only the attributes in "Show Attributes"? All the attributes show up. Or you implemented it in other way?
  1297   Fri Jul 22 08:56:20 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.5.?Re: Date in CSV and XML in UNIX time

PJ Meyer wrote:
So what can be done to make all the dates look like dates?


Simply upgrade to 2.6.0beta where this problem has been solved.
  1296   Fri Jul 22 03:15:29 2005 Question PJ Meyerpjm@pjmeyer.orgQuestionWindows2.5.?Date in CSV and XML in UNIX time
Q: How can dates be exported correctly in CSV and XML?
In windows version I'm getting the Unix seconds since 1970.
XML export:
<DATE>Wed Jun 22 08:29:58 2005</DATE>
<Date_Needed>1119384000</Date_Needed>
<Date_Added>1119470400</Date_Added>

the date record added is good and readable, the two user defined dates are Unix and not real useful in Excel.

Same behavior is the CSV file, the date record added is good, the two user defined dates are Unix seconds.

Now when E-log emails the records all the dates are good - ie readable dates.

So what can be done to make all the dates look like dates?
  1295   Thu Jul 21 12:54:32 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itRequestAll Re: <img> in Display Attribute

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
when I try to use this featur on a conditional attr it is ignored .. If I remove the {1} it is obviously showed .. but also when no $level is defined (taht is infact not what should be)...

BTW, is it possible to not show conditional attributes in mail and in "single entry" view? .. it's quite strange to ave a "Level" of a "Misure", not a "Problem" Tongue

thank you in advance Smile


I added the conditional attributes for the "single entry" view (not the mail yet), so you might again try it.

uhm... it appears a bit strange now..

In the single list:
- only "Author" and "subject" is displayed (text too of course) Crying
- if one edits the entry all fields ar correctly displayed
In full list mode:
- nothing changed, no conditional display is working Crying

revision 1.707 works correctly instead
  1294   Thu Jul 21 11:02:44 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportLinuxrev 1.703Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject               = <b>$subject</b>

the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions..


this patch should fix the problem .. a little bug still remain, if you insert some allowed HTML tags in the subject this is detected by is_html() so the Display Attribute and the Link is not applied .. the result is that the HTML is working but no elog featur is applied


Your line
if (p && strchr(str, '>') && p >= str && *(p-1) != '\\')

in the code does not work. If the pattern is at the beginning of the string (p == str), then (p-1) points to an invalid location and can cause a segmentation fault. The correct patch is in CVS.


ehhe, I used "should" infact Tongue
  1293   Thu Jul 21 11:00:47 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportLinuxrev 1.703Re: Display Subject and HTML tags, regression

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
rev 1.703 makes the following code not to work:
Display Subject               = <b>$subject</b>

the <b> tag is displayed and not interpreted, as it was in previous revisions..


rev. 1.707 makes it work again Big grin


ok, nice Smile
  1292   Thu Jul 21 10:59:22 2005 Reply Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportAll Re: [code] should be a sort of <CDATA >

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Emiliano Gabrielli wrote:
Using the [code] elocode should be intended also to preserve the tagged text from beeing parsed as html or elcode itself ..

this is an example:

Quote:
Note that, for security reasons, you should check the MD5 FINGERPRINT of the SSL certificate issued by the server agaist the following one:

MD5 Fingerprint = 23:A7:AD:33:3C:08:BE:2A:62:6E:85:DF:B8:00:23:40


Thank you


As you can see, your entry with the [code] section is now shown without interpretation. So everything between [code] and [/code] is not interpreted as ELCode tags. The modification is committed to CVS.


thanks Smile
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6