ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
881
|
Mon Jan 17 16:44:28 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | All | v2.5.5-4 | Re: MOptions and Extendable |
> If an attribute uses MOptions and is also extendable, clicking "Add
> <attribute name>" and entering a value adds the value to the MOptions, but
> does not put the value into the log entry. The log record has that
> attribute blank.
> You have to go back into the record and edit it to put the new value in.
I fixed that bug just now, thanks for reporting it. It's available in revision
1.535 under CVS. |
882
|
Mon Jan 17 16:51:35 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> I have a logbook with an attribute that has a number of fixed values. I
> use MOptions to prevent typos when entering and allow multiple "keywords".
> When searching the users can only search on one keyword.
> Is there any way to search on multiple values (AAA|BBB|CCC)? If I do not
> use MOption, they can do this, but the users entering logs may mistype the
> keywords.
Even with Moptions, you can put into the "Text:" line
(AAA|BBB|CCC)
and click on "Search text also in attributes". This is a valid regular
expression with searches for AAA or BBB or CCC. Unfortunately you still can
mistype the values. If I would add check boxes in the find page, it would not
be clear if one searches for an "AND" of several values or an "OR" (Most people
would probably think that they want an "AND" because this happens if they
restrict several attributes). |
884
|
Tue Jan 18 03:37:40 2005 |
| Neil Swartz | neilswartz@verizon.net | Question | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> > I have a logbook with an attribute that has a number of fixed values. I
> > use MOptions to prevent typos when entering and allow multiple "keywords".
> > When searching the users can only search on one keyword.
> > Is there any way to search on multiple values (AAA|BBB|CCC)? If I do not
> > use MOption, they can do this, but the users entering logs may mistype the
> > keywords.
>
> Even with Moptions, you can put into the "Text:" line
>
> (AAA|BBB|CCC)
>
> and click on "Search text also in attributes". This is a valid regular
> expression with searches for AAA or BBB or CCC. Unfortunately you still can
> mistype the values. If I would add check boxes in the find page, it would not
> be clear if one searches for an "AND" of several values or an "OR" (Most people
> would probably think that they want an "AND" because this happens if they
> restrict several attributes).
Yes, I can use the Text: search, but I still have the mistyping problem. (My
field values are like "ENA, ETB, HRES, etc.) -- Easy to have a typo.
Currently there is a dropdown when searching for MOption fields. Maybe you could
allow multiple selections in the dropdown. This to me is an "OR" search. |
885
|
Tue Jan 18 13:06:48 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> Currently there is a dropdown when searching for MOption fields. Maybe you could
> allow multiple selections in the dropdown. This to me is an "OR" search.
Multiple selections are not possible in HTML, only a single value can be selected at
a time. |
886
|
Wed Jan 19 04:33:00 2005 |
| Neil Swartz | neilswartz@verizon.net | Info | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
> > Currently there is a dropdown when searching for MOption fields. Maybe you could
> > allow multiple selections in the dropdown. This to me is an "OR" search.
>
> Multiple selections are not possible in HTML, only a single value can be selected at
> a time.
Try: (From monster.com)
<SELECT NAME="lid" multiple size="5">
<OPTION VALUE=""> ------- Select all -------- </OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="323">Alabama-Anniston</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="324">Alabama-Birmingham</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="325">Alabama-Mobile/Dothan</OPTION>
<OPTION VALUE="328">Alabama-Montgomery</OPTION>
...
</SELECT>
Although this may not be supported in all browsers. (I think recent versions of
Netscape and IE support it) |
891
|
Fri Jan 21 23:30:35 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | All | 2.5.5 | Re: Find using multiple values with MOptions |
<SELECT NAME="lid" multiple size="5">
Oh, nice, I didn't know of that. However, I prefer to have multiple options to be selected
with individual check boxes, this saves more vertical window space. So I added that
functionality to the find page. If more than one option of a MOptions attribute are
selected, they are or'ed together during the search. You can try that in this forum with
the "OS" for example. |
898
|
Tue Feb 1 14:41:08 2005 |
| Bee | ralphb.elog@spampot.com | Question | All | 2.5.5-2 | Finding Last Changed Entries |
Is there an inbuilt way to find the last entries changed in an elog?
I could add a "Last Mod" attribute and then config "Subst on edit Last Mod =
$date", but it occurred to me that this functionality might already be in
this wonderful tool somewhere, but I just haven't found it yet.
So, is it?
Best regards, Ralph. |
899
|
Tue Feb 1 14:44:00 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.5-2 | Re: Finding Last Changed Entries |
> Is there an inbuilt way to find the last entries changed in an elog?
>
> I could add a "Last Mod" attribute and then config "Subst on edit Last Mod =
> $date", but it occurred to me that this functionality might already be in
> this wonderful tool somewhere, but I just haven't found it yet.
>
> So, is it?
No it isn't. Not everybody wants it. So you have to do it in the way you
outlined it. Also have a look at http://midas.psi.ch/elog/faq.html#11
- Stefan |