ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
65758
|
Tue Feb 26 03:06:06 2008 |
| Uwe | uweho@web.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.3 | Problem updating from 2.7.2 to 2.7.3 |
Hello,
I am trying to update from version V2.7.2-2041 to V2.7.3 but getting the attached error message. OS is Windows 2003. I installed the update on Windows XP without a problem. Does anybody know ho to solve that problem? Thanks!
Uwe
|
Attachment 1: error.JPG
|
|
1767
|
Thu Mar 9 21:10:18 2006 |
| Edmundo T Rodriguez | edrodrig@chpnet.org | Question | Linux | 2.6.1 | Problem submitting entries in ELOG after migrating from Windows to Linux |
I was able to install ELOG v2.61. in a Compaq ProLiant DL360 running with SUSE Linux v10
The migration/implementation went quiet well ...
ELOG v2.6.1 application came up find!.
I can login with No problems.
I can see previous logs entries, sort, etc.
But, I can NOT create any new-log (new entries) in any logbook. I get this message:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New entry cannot be written to directory
"/eLOGv261/logbooks/Administration/"
Please check that it exists and elogd has write access and disk is not full
Please use your browser's back button to go back
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The previous logbooks where in ...
\Program Files\ELOG\logbooks\Administration
\MainFrame
\Unix
\OpenVMS
\RDBMS
New logbooks are in the following place ...
/eLOGv261/logbooks/Administration
/MainFrame
/Unix
/OpenVMS
/RDBMS
How can it read old log entries and I NOT create new ones?
I am sure I missing something. Can I know what?
Also, It will be good to have an entry in the ELOG web-site
explaining any migration steps from Window to Linux and reverse!
Please, help.
Thank you! |
1592
|
Fri Jan 13 03:21:32 2006 |
| Chris Warner | christopher_warner@dcd.uscourts.gov | Question | Linux | | Problem selecting ports |
I had problems getting elog to run on port 8080 (or many others). I have it installed on Redhat Enterprise Linux rel 4. The only way I was able to get it working was using port 80. I would like to run it on a different port if possible but I'm not sure what is wrong.
Any Ideas |
69307
|
Mon Feb 22 12:29:16 2021 |
| Stefano Lacaprara | stefano.lacaprara@pd.infn.it | Question | Linux | ELOG V3.1.3- | Problem in logging with LDAP and passwd |
Dear experts,
I have a logbook which has authentication as follow
Authentication = LDAP, File
Password file = PASSWD.file
LDAP server = ldaps://it-ldap-XXX.XXX.XX:1636
LDAP userbase = ou=people,ou=RGY,o=XXX,c=XX
LDAP login attribute = uid
LDAP register = 0
Self register = 0
Allow password change = 0
Some of the my user (but not all) have issue in accessing this protected elogbook.
The ldap password is correct (we checked).
What I see in the log is as follow:
22-Feb-2021 11:25:51 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
22-Feb-2021 11:25:59 [XXX.YYY.ZZZ.QQ] {Beam Run} LOGIN user "USERNAME" (attempt)
The user USERNAME is present in PASSWD.file.
For other user, for which the login works, I do see an (attempt) and then (success)
we tried the standard stuff: clear cache/cookies and with different browser. We also tried to remove the user from PASSWD.file and
create it again, but nothing has worked.
Any suggestion how I can debug this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Stefano |
66339
|
Fri May 1 08:05:42 2009 |
| mike cianci | mike2.cianci@comcast.net | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-2185 | Problem Naming Logbooks |
I have a logbook named "Centaur" (instrument name) for a problem log on an instrument and a logbook named "CentaurNewLot" for
a logbook (Database Like - ELOG format) where we would log reagent lot number changes for that instrument.
The problem is that when I name the logbooks, like I have, it screws up the formatting (List page) of the second log book.
If I rename the second logbook something totally unrelated to the first logbook my originally intended formatting returns. |
2171
|
Tue Mar 20 13:45:20 2007 |
| Ben Shepherd | bjs54'at'dl'dot'ac'dot'uk | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1739 | Private logbook - no guest access? |
Hi,
I want to set up a logbook which you have to be logged in to be able to read entries. I've already got three logbooks which can be viewed by anyone but only logged-in users can modify them. For the fourth one, I want to have a private logbook which can't be read by 'guest' users. Is this possible?
cheers
ben |
65674
|
Wed Dec 5 13:10:52 2007 |
| Adam Blandford | adamhblandford@hotmail.com | Request | Windows | 2.7.0-1964 | Print Function |
While it is possible to print a logbook using the standard web browser print command in the Full or Summary view, a dedicated print function allowing the user to print out a hardcopy of a particular logbook would be very helpful.
Cheers
Adam
P.S. Thankyou for the response in elog:65671 |
1486
|
Wed Oct 26 16:00:00 2005 |
| Yoshio Imai | imai@kph.uni-mainz.de | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.0beta5 | Preset text overriden after preview |
Hi, Stefan!
I have run across a problem with preset texts. We have defined a form to be filled in when the operator selects a specific combination of attributes. This form appears correctly, but after filling in the form, clicking on "Preview" leads to an error: the preview text is correct, but the actual text entry field is overriden again with the empty form. Clicking on "Submit" at this point then submits only the empty form, and the information filled in is lost.
When clicking on "Submit" without previewing, the text is entered correctly to the elog. Do you know where the problem might come from?
Thanks in advance
Yoshio |