ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
643
|
Mon Aug 2 19:27:56 2004 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | All | 2.5.3 | Re: Wishlist: TOOLTIP for ATTRIBUTES |
> Ok, I added the option
>
> Tooltip <attribute> = ...
>
> I apply the HTML "title" tag to the whole table row, so the tooltip appears on the
> whole line, not only the attribute name. I guess this is much more intuitive. Give
> it a try. New version under CVS and available as a snapshot.
I like the implementation, especially with the tooltip popping up anywhere in the
area. Thanks. |
653
|
Tue Aug 3 16:59:36 2004 |
| Drew | drew.card@gmail.com | Bug fix | Linux | Windows | 2.5.3 | Re: speeding up elog : gcc compile optimizations |
> > Is there something else which is making this difficult to do?
>
> Not really, but hsearch() & Co. are not available under Windows, so I have to extract the
> source code from the GNU C libarary or so. Since the last discussion I had lots of other
> topics on my to-do list, such as mirroring and cloning, but the speed issue is getting more
> and more up on the priority list.
Speaking of windows I'd like to note that when I moved my call tracking config from a slow BSD
system (PPro 200Mhz) to a faster windows system (P3 733M) I noted a huge slow down in the
interface. Talking about perhaps 1-2 seconds before to 10-15 seconds after. Using
sysinternals file monitor I see that elogd is hammering each log file in the directory. Not
sure what else is going on. 309 log files - only 1.25Meg.
Anything I can do short of pruning down the files?
[Edit: In both cases above my default view is filtered and sorted - so that I only see things
with a specific status. Taking away the filtering resolves this hit - but does not explain the
speed difference between platforms.]
-D |
677
|
Wed Aug 25 13:36:56 2004 |
| Bartjan Wattel | watt0006@mail.hzeeland.nl | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.5.3 | ELOG with stunnel won't show logbook |
Hi,
I have an ELOG installation on a RedHat linux server, called myserver. I
can connect to this server with the following entries in the elogd.cfg file:
[global]
URL=http://myserver:8080
This works fine. I can log in, select logbooks, edit/create entries etc.
etc.
However, I want this connection to be encrypted. So I activate stunnel (v4)
in such a way that stunnel listens to port 8081 and forwards to the
("remote") port 8080, which is the "original" elog port. I change the URL=
entry in de elogd.cfg file to URL=https://myserver:8081 in order to use the
SSL encrypted connection.
At this time, when I connect to https://myserver:8081 I get the
welcome/login screen, but when I enter the (correct) username and password,
the elog program does not show the contents of the logbook buts shows the
loginscreen again. If I enter a wrong username/password, I do get a correct
error-screen. So it seems that the connection is correct, but there is some
sort of problem in ELOG. Anyone who can give me a hand here? |
679
|
Tue Aug 31 20:29:20 2004 |
| Patricio Castro | pato.castro@terra.cl | Question | Linux | 2.5.3 | Options Items limits |
Hello friends,
Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
Thanks for any help |
681
|
Wed Sep 1 22:25:01 2004 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | Linux | 2.5.3 | Re: Options Items limits |
> Hello friends,
>
> Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help
I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
are set as constants. I think this might be the line:
#define MAX_N_LIST 100
So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
comfort level with changing stefan's code. |
686
|
Tue Sep 7 17:49:50 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.5.3 | Re: Options Items limits |
> > Hello friends,
> >
> > Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for any help
>
> I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
> are set as constants. I think this might be the line:
>
> #define MAX_N_LIST 100
>
> So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
> comfort level with changing stefan's code.
Agree. The only potential problem is that if this value becomes too big, you
will get a stack overflow from time to time. So best is experiment yourself a
bit. A avlue of 150 or so should be no problem.
- Stefan |
692
|
Wed Sep 8 15:37:09 2004 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 2.5.3 | Re: ELOG with stunnel won't show logbook |
That bug has been fixed recently, please update to the newest version. |
741
|
Sun Oct 17 22:47:39 2004 |
| G | levineg@med.govt.nz | Question | Other | 2.5.3 | Re: ELOG e-mail notifications - their arrival time is wrong |
Ok, i compiled the code below and ran it,
it prints out:
timezone: 134513644
but in BASH shell if i type DATE, then this is the output:
Mon Oct 18 09:44:00 NZDT 2004
so it does know about NZ time...
Anyone got ideas?
Thanks all.
G.
> > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:26:28 -3736512
>
> The timezone offset (-3736512) is obtained from the "timezone" variable, which
> is initialized with the tzset() function inside elogd. See "man tzset" for
> details. It looks like if the timezone on your FreeBSD box is not correctly
> defined.
>
> Try to compile and execute following C program:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <time.h>
>
> main()
> {
> tzset();
> printf("timezone: %d\n", timezone);
> }
>
> This should print something like "timezone: -3600". If not, you might consider
> defining the "TZ" environment variable. Maybe some FreeBSD expert knows some
> details about this. |