Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 678 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  643   Mon Aug 2 19:27:56 2004 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.5.3Re: Wishlist: TOOLTIP for ATTRIBUTES
> Ok, I added the option
> 
> Tooltip <attribute> = ...
> 
> I apply the HTML "title" tag to the whole table row, so the tooltip appears on the
> whole line, not only the attribute name. I guess this is much more intuitive. Give
> it a try. New version under CVS and available as a snapshot.

I like the implementation, especially with the tooltip popping up anywhere in the
area.  Thanks.
  653   Tue Aug 3 16:59:36 2004 Angy Drewdrew.card@gmail.comBug fixLinux | Windows2.5.3Re: speeding up elog : gcc compile optimizations
> > Is there something else  which is making this difficult to do?
> 
> Not really, but hsearch() & Co. are not available under Windows, so I have to extract the
> source code from the GNU C libarary or so. Since the last discussion I had lots of other
> topics on my to-do list, such as mirroring and cloning, but the speed issue is getting more
> and more up on the priority list.

Speaking of windows I'd like to note that when I moved my call tracking config from a slow BSD
system (PPro 200Mhz) to a faster windows system (P3 733M) I noted a huge slow down in the
interface.  Talking about perhaps 1-2 seconds before to 10-15 seconds after.  Using
sysinternals file monitor I see that elogd is hammering each log file in the directory.  Not
sure what else is going on.  309 log files - only 1.25Meg.  

Anything I can do short of pruning down the files?

[Edit:  In both cases above my default view is filtered and sorted - so that I only see things
with a specific status.  Taking away the filtering resolves this hit - but does not explain the
speed difference between platforms.]

-D
  677   Wed Aug 25 13:36:56 2004 Question Bartjan Wattelwatt0006@mail.hzeeland.nlQuestionLinux | Windows2.5.3ELOG with stunnel won't show logbook
Hi,

I have an ELOG installation on a RedHat linux server, called myserver. I 
can connect to this server with the following entries in the elogd.cfg file:
   [global]
   URL=http://myserver:8080
This works fine. I can log in, select logbooks, edit/create entries etc. 
etc.

However, I want this connection to be encrypted. So I activate stunnel (v4) 
in such a way that stunnel listens to port 8081 and forwards to the 
("remote") port 8080, which is the "original" elog port. I change the URL= 
entry in de elogd.cfg file to URL=https://myserver:8081 in order to use the 
SSL encrypted connection.

At this time, when I connect to https://myserver:8081 I get the 
welcome/login screen, but when I enter the (correct) username and password, 
the elog program does not show the contents of the logbook buts shows the 
loginscreen again. If I enter a wrong username/password, I do get a correct 
error-screen. So it seems that the connection is correct, but there is some 
sort of problem in ELOG. Anyone who can give me a hand here?
  679   Tue Aug 31 20:29:20 2004 Question Patricio Castropato.castro@terra.clQuestionLinux2.5.3Options Items limits
Hello friends, 

Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List



Thanks for any help
  681   Wed Sep 1 22:25:01 2004 Blink Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux2.5.3Re: Options Items limits
> Hello friends, 
> 
> Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for any help

I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
are set as constants.  I think this might be the line:

#define MAX_N_LIST      100

So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
comfort level with changing stefan's code.
  686   Tue Sep 7 17:49:50 2004 Cool Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.5.3Re: Options Items limits
> > Hello friends, 
> > 
> > Exist some form to increase limits of items (100) in the Options List
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for any help
> 
> I believe only through an edit of the C code and a recompile, as the values
> are set as constants.  I think this might be the line:
> 
> #define MAX_N_LIST      100
> 
> So, yes, there exists a way and the ease of this way is dependent upon your
> comfort level with changing stefan's code.

Agree. The only potential problem is that if this value becomes too big, you
will get a stack overflow from time to time. So best is experiment yourself a
bit. A avlue of 150 or so should be no problem.

- Stefan
  692   Wed Sep 8 15:37:09 2004 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows2.5.3Re: ELOG with stunnel won't show logbook
That bug has been fixed recently, please update to the newest version.
  741   Sun Oct 17 22:47:39 2004 Reply Glevineg@med.govt.nzQuestionOther2.5.3Re: ELOG e-mail notifications - their arrival time is wrong
Ok, i compiled the code below and ran it,
it prints out:

timezone: 134513644

but in BASH shell if i type DATE, then this is the output:
Mon Oct 18 09:44:00 NZDT 2004
so it does know about NZ time...

Anyone got ideas?

Thanks all.
G.


> > Date:  Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:26:28 -3736512
> 
> The timezone offset (-3736512) is obtained from the "timezone" variable, which
> is initialized with the tzset() function inside elogd. See "man tzset" for
> details. It looks like if the timezone on your FreeBSD box is not correctly
> defined. 
> 
> Try to compile and execute following C program:
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <time.h>
> 
> main()
> {
>    tzset();
>    printf("timezone: %d\n", timezone);
> }
> 
> This should print something like "timezone: -3600". If not, you might consider
> defining the "TZ" environment variable. Maybe some FreeBSD expert knows some
> details about this.
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6