Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 689 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1023   Fri Mar 25 00:30:57 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinuxr1592Re: wrong handling of attachment names
> - Irestarted the daemon
> - attached strace to it
> - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images 
>   (two thumbnails, the other are old images get resized my the browser)
> - repeted previous point a couple of times
> - press F5 (mozilla-firefox)  the browser hangs 4ever
> - stop the load
> - repeat point 3, all right
> - F5 => hangs
> - F5 => hangs

I tried to reproduce this problem, but everything was fine. This problem was never
reported by anyone else as well.
  1022   Thu Mar 24 21:17:28 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows Re: Database type logbook entry creation
> I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that 
> shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those 
> pounds to dollars.  pounds x $4.00 = cost  I was wondering if this was 
> possible? 
> 
> All other fields would be just Date, Batch#, Operator, Reason, Process 
> Operator, Manager, Lbs, and Cost,  I would also like to total this cost if 
> possible, on a search selected basis. Similar to Excel.

Unfortunately not. But your request is on the wishlist since some time, I added
your vote.
  1021   Thu Mar 24 20:36:50 2005 Question David Egolfdegolf@fujicolor.comQuestionWindows Database type logbook entry creation
I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that 
shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those 
pounds to dollars.  pounds x $4.00 = cost  I was wondering if this was 
possible? 

All other fields would be just Date, Batch#, Operator, Reason, Process 
Operator, Manager, Lbs, and Cost,  I would also like to total this cost if 
possible, on a search selected basis. Similar to Excel.

Thanks for any input

David Egolf
  1020   Thu Mar 24 13:59:06 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportAll2.5.8Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails
> Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
> here is an example of your online Demo elog:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920

Ok, I fixed that, the validation link above show a valid page.
  1019   Thu Mar 24 13:40:27 2005 Angy Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportLinuxr1592Re: wrong handling of attachment names
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
> 
> http://arcolog.roma2.infn.it:8080/ARCO/050309_170709/peeling+002.jpg
> 
> instead of the correct one:
> 
> http://arcolog.roma2.infn.it:8080/ARCO/050309_170709_peeling+002.jpg
> 
> The more annoing thing is that elogs hangs on this. a strace shows a select
> on fd n°3 and 5 that loops forever (returning a timeout error):
> 
> send(4, "<141>Mar 23 11:36:25 elogd[22189"..., 35, 0) = 35
> rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_IGN}, NULL, 8) = 0
> select(1024, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
> select(1024, [3 5], NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
> 
> 
> May be the better solution is, after fixing the bug for backward
> compatibility with already uploaded images, to implement a forced characters
> substitution at upload time, replacing spaces and every character not in a
> "allowed chars" list with an underscore

donno if the following is correlated, otherwise there is another problem I
guess :-)
I attached a strace of elog, hope you'll find it useful.

- Irestarted the daemon
- attached strace to it
- requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images 
  (two thumbnails, the other are old images get resized my the browser)
- repeted previous point a couple of times
- press F5 (mozilla-firefox)  the browser hangs 4ever
- stop the load
- repeat point 3, all right
- F5 => hangs
- F5 => hangs

there should be some problem, may be in the socket ?
  1018   Thu Mar 24 13:21:28 2005 Warning Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportAll2.5.8Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.

Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ... here is an example of your online Demo elog: http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920

  1017   Thu Mar 24 12:30:07 2005 Warning Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itInfoLinux Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing
> Hi to all,
> 
> I've prepared a new Debian package.  This version will probably be the one
> which you'll find in Sarge/stable.
> 
> There are some invasive changes in this version which call for a serious
> test.  In accordance with a suggestion, I've changed the configuration
> mechanism.  For details, please read the NEWS.Debian file attached.
> 
> Could the Debian users who follow this forum test it and give some feedback?
> You can download the package from the following link:
> 
>   http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.org/debian/elog_2.5.8+r1592-1_i386.deb
> 
> Thanks in advance for your participation,

btw, what about in including in default/elog also a voice for the "-x" switch ??

It is a security related thing and may be passed only on the command line to the
daemon, so it should be governed by the system elog admin.
  1016   Thu Mar 24 12:26:46 2005 Agree Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itInfoLinux Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing
> > It seems to work nice to me.
> > Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> > example for all allowed parameters in the distributed  /etc/default/elog
> 
> Thanks for the test.  Please note that, /etc/default/elog is partially auto
> created during the installation.  All options except PIDFILE and CONFFILE are
> currently listed (as configured or commented out).  If you didn't see these
> options (after the update), there must be a problem.   Did you mean the lack of
> PIDFILE and CONFFILE in the default file?

no, my bad (it seems :-P) .. I re-installed the package now on my laptop and seems
to work fine... maybe I have swapped the diff result when installed yesterday.

Making tests I found another problem, her is the report:

####
root@emc2:/home/albert# apt-get remove elog
Lettura della lista dei pacchetti in corso... Fatto
Generazione dell'albero delle dipendenze in corso... Fatto
I seguenti pacchetti saranno RIMOSSI:
  elog
0 aggiornati, 0 installati, 1 da rimuovere e 0 non aggiornati.
È necessario prendere 0B di archivi.
Dopo l'estrazione, verranno liberati 2444kB di spazio su disco.
Continuare? [S/n]
(Lettura del database ... 152033 file e directory attualmente installati.)
Rimuovo elog ...
Stopping ELOG daemon: elogd.
root@emc2:/home/albert# rm /etc/default/elog
rm: rimuovere regular file `/etc/default/elog'? y
root@emc2:/home/albert# apt-get install elog
Lettura della lista dei pacchetti in corso... Fatto
Generazione dell'albero delle dipendenze in corso... Fatto
I seguenti pacchetti NUOVI (NEW) saranno installati:
  elog
0 aggiornati, 1 installati, 0 da rimuovere e 0 non aggiornati.
È necessario prendere 0B/530kB di archivi.
Dopo l'estrazione, verranno occupati 2444kB di spazio su disco.
Selezionato il pacchetto elog, che non lo era.
(Lettura del database ... 151926 file e directory attualmente installati.)
Spacchetto elog (da .../elog_2.5.8+r1592-1_i386.deb) ...
Configuro elog (2.5.8+r1592-1) ...
cat: /etc/default/elog: No such file or directory
Starting ELOG daemon: elogd.
####


So, removing an existing elog (not purging) and installing again raise the error.
Why installation creates the default/elog file only the first time ?  I think it
shoud do the job everytime (and everytime ask the user is there is a diff to be
checked)
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6