Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 693 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  67180   Thu Feb 2 16:51:32 2012 Question Kenneth Nielsenk.nielsen81@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.9Migrate to elog

Hallo and thanks for a great program.

At my work we have previously been using another program (Rednotebook) for our lab journals, but now we wish to migrate to elog because it is more configurable and because it runs in a browser.

We would off course like to move all of our old log entries with us. Luckily Rednotebook uses a standard module (YAML) for data storage, so I can easily access the data (e.g. with python) and I have already done do, and I have exchanged the native markup with html.

Now I would prefer it if I can make the elog data files directly, in stead of using the elog command, because that makes it possible and easy to revert the change, and also to not have to handle escaping html string before feeding them to elog on the commandline. I have actually already written the program that produces the elog data files, but now I have a few questions:

1) Is there an overall way of validating the datafiles, to make sure elog doesn't choke on them at some point in the future when I try to open one of the old entries. Along the same lines, does elog parse all the files when the demon is started, so if it starts then I'm ok?

2) What exactly are the requirements for the HTML content

2a) Will any valid html do, or are there some speciel requirements (e.g. like   at blank lines)

2b) Does it require a particular version of html, because then I could at least validate it against that doctype beforehand

3) Is there a log from elog where I can see if it encounters something it doesn't like?

I hope the you can answer some of my questions.

Regards Kenneth

  65656   Sat Nov 24 03:16:46 2007 Entry lancelance1.hayward@yahoo.comInfoWindowsELOG V2.7.Message ID and trouble ticketing system

I am trying to create a trouble ticket system however when you do a reply you get a new message ID.  I was hoping to use the message ID as a ticket number and just wanted to use the reply as an append to the orginal message id, however each reply creates a new message id. This would be a nightmare to track and if I closed the ticket I would have to close every log entry related to this.

Does anyone know how to either make the reply and appended reply (appended to the orignal message id) or how to create a field that automatically gives it a new trouble ticket number.

Has anyone configured a trouble ticket system that I could look at to get some ideas?

 

Thanks,

 

Lance

  68316   Fri May 6 16:19:10 2016 Question John Mundjohn.mund@noaa.govQuestionLinuxV2.7.8-2278Merge duplicate types

Hello,

We have accumulated some duplicate 'types' in one of our logbooks.  Is it possible to merge them?

Thanks,

John

 

  1184   Tue Jun 7 15:48:53 2005 Entry Emiliano GabrielliAlberT@SuperAlberT.itBug reportLinux2.6.0-betaMenu text ignored??
I tried to insert a row in the menu but it seems to totally ignore the command ...
both inserting a filename and simply typeing "Menu text = <b>PIPPO</b>" brings to a page with *no* "PIPPO" in the HTML source ...

is this a bug or another my misconfiguration???
  876   Wed Jan 12 23:53:27 2005 Question PJ Meyerpjm@pjmeyer.orgBug reportWindows2.5.2Menu command = doesn't list
Have tried to use "Menu commands =" to list menu commands available as per:
"Menu commands = List, Back, New, Edit, Delete, Find, Config, HELP, Logout"

but it does not seem to work; with command above I get default menu 
structure.

Using:
"Find Menu commands = List, Back, New, Edit, Find, Delete, Config, Logout, 
HELP"

I get the menu I want.
Q what's the difference?????
  66376   Thu Jun 4 17:51:50 2009 Entry jon huangjon.huang@ses.comBug reportWindows2.76Memory leak in 2.76 elogd.exe

Hi,

There's seems to be a memory leak with elogd.exe running windows.  I had this problem with older version of elogd.exe, i've just upgrade to the latest and the problems still exist. I've had this issue with earlier versions.  I've just upgrade elog to the latest 2.76 version. The memory leak still persist. I really appreciate if you or anyone here can help me resolve this issue.

Thank!

JH

 

Attachment 1: elogd.jpg
elogd.jpg
  67124   Tue Sep 20 04:46:55 2011 Warning Ryanryan.hoitt@intelsat.comBug reportLinux2.9.0-2411Memory Leak in V2.9.0-2411 (Mirroring Related)

I have two identical servers (IBM X337) setup on the same LAN with Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS with ELOGD running (Compiled from tarbell) with the same exact package install base. (Only difference between the two servers is the hostname, and the ELOGD.CFG global section)

I noticed after setting these servers up today that ELOGD crashed on the server configured to mirror. It looks like there may be a memory leak in the mirroring of ELOG.
SERVER 1 ELOGD.CFG
[global]
Mirror server = http://10.146.1.76
Mirror config = 1
Mirror cron = 0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * *
Mirror user = (* Removed for Web Post *)
port = 80
Allowed encoding = 1
Suppress default = 3
Mode commands = 1
Password file = password.pwd
Self register = 1
Admin user = (* Removed for Web Post *)
Time format = %d-%b-%y %H:%M UTC
Group 2009 = Station Log-09, DAT-09, Hours Logging-09
Group 2010 = Station Log 10, DAT-10, Hours Logging-10
Group 2011 = Station Log, DAT, Hours Logging, Operations Tasks, Viasat-1, OS-2
Group Cable Database = Cable Database
Group Provisioning = Provisioning
Group ECR = ECR
SERVER 1 SYSLOGD (cat /var/log/syslog |grep elog)
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8588]: elogd 2.9.0 built Sep 19 2011, 10:32:58
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8588]: revision 2411
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8588]: Falling back to default group "elog"
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8588]: Falling back to default user "elog"
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8588]: FCKedit detected
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8590]: Falling back to default group "elog"
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8590]: Falling back to default user "elog"
Sep 19 12:14:13 riverside-log elogd[8588]: Server listening on port 80 ...
Sep 19 19:55:05 riverside-log elogd[8588]: xmalloc: not enough memory
SERVER 1 (Set to mirror off server 2) Memory Usage over 1 hour (ps aux|grep elog)
elog      8760 11.6 3.4109240 35092 ?
elog      8760 12.2 3.9137852 40204 ?
elog      8760 11.6 4.4165448 45440 ?
elog      8760 10.7 5.4221652 55548 ?
elog      8760 9.9 5.9249752 60552 ?
elog      8760 10.1 6.4278364 65680 ?
elog      8760 9.5 6.8305712 70700 ?
SERVER 2 Memory Usage over 1 hour (ps aux|grep elog)
elog       799 2.1 2.6 31744 27116 ?
elog       799 2.0 2.6 31744 27116 ?
elog       799 2.1 2.6 31744 27116 ?
elog       799 2.0 2.6 31744 27116 ?
elog       799 2.0 2.6 31744 27116 ?
elog       799 2.0 2.6 31744 27116 ?
elog       799 2.1 2.6 31744 27116 ?
  65993   Sun Oct 12 20:40:32 2008 Question Steve Nahnnahn@mit.eduQuestionLinux2.7.4-2111Maximum number of mail recipients

Just wondering if there is still a maximum number of mail recipients?  I saw  a number of 112 floating around in old forum entries, and I need more, like currently 300.  When I try it, the elogd hangs, not much output to speak of, but won't reply to Apache on its port.  Any quick fix (like changing a def'd variable somewhere?)

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6