Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 709 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon5.gif   Installing Elog on Linux Oracle 9 and missing libssl.so.10, posted by Daniel Sajdyk on Thu Feb 2 10:58:54 2023 

Hello,

I  tried to install Elog 3.1.4 from rpm on Oracle Linux 9 with command:

sudo dnf localinstall elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64.rpm

But I got error:

Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:06 ago on Thu 02 Feb 2023 10:35:13 CET.
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libssl.so.10()(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
  - nothing provides libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Using dnf I installed libssl.so.11 (cannot find version 10) and it doesn't help. So my question is: can I use one of proposes by dnf solution as:

  1. --skip-broken
  2. --nobest

Does Elog will work stabilityy after that?

Best Regards

icon2.gif   Installation: Failed Dependencies, posted by Phil Rubin on Fri Mar 11 17:19:02 2016 

Is there anything I can do about this?


kernel:  2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64

ldd (GNU libc) 2.12

/lib64/libc.so.6

/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10


rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

icon5.gif   Installation: Failed Dependencies, posted by Phil Rubin on Fri Mar 11 17:29:47 2016 

Is there anything I can do about this?


kernel:  2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64

ldd (GNU libc) 2.12

/lib64/libc.so.6

/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10


rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

icon5.gif   Installation with amp on Rocky Linux, posted by Nina Bondarenko on Thu Mar 21 15:23:52 2024 

Hello all,

I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem. 

rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm 

error: Failed dependencies:

    liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

 

Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!

Bests, Nina

icon1.gif   Installation problems, posted by George B. on Mon Oct 27 13:05:13 2008 
Hello,

I just upgraded to elog 2.7.5 from 2.6.4 on my Debian system. Here is some feedback:

1) "make" fails if libssl-dev package is not installed. Documentation does not mention SSL library requirements.

2) /etc/init.d/elogd: line 10: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No such file or directory (I fixed this by commenting
out that line).

3) Starting elogd: /etc/init.d/elogd: line 34: echo_success: command not found (Fixed by search/replace "echo_"
to "echo ").


Hope this helps.

George.
icon5.gif   Install on Server 2003: , posted by Wythe IT on Mon Sep 15 16:22:39 2008 

I am using Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition.  It is up-to-date and a full legal version installed from a geniune MS disk (to put that notion out the way).  I host a variety of webpages from this server through IIS6.0.

I am having an issue after installation of the ELOG software.  I grabbed the newest version from this website and ran the executable.  It installed fine (or appeared to do so).

Upon starting the ELOG server I receive the following error:

elogd.exe - Unable to Locate Component

This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found.  Re-installing the application may fix this problem.

 

The file in question is part of an ancient Visual C distributeable.  This distributeable for my purposes no longer appears to be available (as I am on .net 3.5).  I am unsure of downloading the older runtime libraries from sites that are not microsoft's.  I am curious as to how I could go about making elog execute.  Any help would be appreciated.  Thank you!

 

icon4.gif   Install error on MacOS X, posted by Exaos Lee on Mon Oct 10 19:22:51 2005 makefile_modified.tgz
Executing "make" on MacOS X is OK, but "make install" failed due to the following error:
/usr/bin/install -m 0755 -d /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/man/man1/ /usr/local/man/man8/
/usr/bin/install -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elog elconv /usr/local/bin
install: bin: Invalid argument
make: *** [install] Error 67

The reason is that the account "bin" and group "bin" are missing on MacOS X. I also found that the following lines in "Makefile" doesn't work:
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),darwin)
CC = cc
endif

I have fixed this problem. The diff of Makefile as following:
diff Makefile.darwin Makefile.origin
====================================
24,25d23
< BINOWNER = bin
< BINGROUP = bin
30,31d27
< OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
<
40,43d35
< ifeq ($(OSTYPE),Darwin)
< OSTYPE=darwin
< endif
<
46,47d37
< BINOWNER = root
< BINGROUP = admin
89,90c79,80
<       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o ${BINOWNER} -g ${BINGROUP} elog elconv $(DESTDIR)
<       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o ${BINOWNER} -g ${BINGROUP} elogd $(SDESTDIR)
---
>       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elog elconv $(DESTDIR)
>       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elogd $(SDESTDIR)


The modified Makefiles have been attached.
icon5.gif   Inserting images via Internet Explorer, posted by Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjos on Fri Jun 2 21:20:06 2006 
Hi Stefan,

I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like
[IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG]
and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.

When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag
[IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG]
.

I did the same test using this forum, and the results are identical
that was related above.

Is it a bug or I'm doing something wrong ?

Thanks,

Elaine
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6