Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 709 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  69642   Thu Feb 2 10:58:54 2023 Question Daniel Sajdykdaniel.sajdyk@gmail.comQuestionLinux3.1.4Installing Elog on Linux Oracle 9 and missing libssl.so.10

Hello,

I  tried to install Elog 3.1.4 from rpm on Oracle Linux 9 with command:

sudo dnf localinstall elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64.rpm

But I got error:

Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:06 ago on Thu 02 Feb 2023 10:35:13 CET.
Error:
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides libssl.so.10()(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
  - nothing provides libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

Using dnf I installed libssl.so.11 (cannot find version 10) and it doesn't help. So my question is: can I use one of proposes by dnf solution as:

  1. --skip-broken
  2. --nobest

Does Elog will work stabilityy after that?

Best Regards

  68280   Fri Mar 11 17:19:02 2016 Reply Phil Rubinrubinp@cern.chQuestionLinux3.1.1Installation: Failed Dependencies

Is there anything I can do about this?


kernel:  2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64

ldd (GNU libc) 2.12

/lib64/libc.so.6

/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10


rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

  68281   Fri Mar 11 17:29:47 2016 Question Phil Rubinrubinp@cern.chQuestionLinux3.1.1Installation: Failed Dependencies

Is there anything I can do about this?


kernel:  2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64

ldd (GNU libc) 2.12

/lib64/libc.so.6

/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10


rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm

error: Failed dependencies:

libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386

  69764   Thu Mar 21 15:23:52 2024 Question Nina Bondarenkonina.bondarenko@uu.seQuestionLinux3.1.5-1Installation with amp on Rocky Linux

Hello all,

I am installing elog on an Rocky Linux instance. Have dependensy problem. 

rpm -Uvh elog-latest.el7.x86_64.rpm 

error: Failed dependencies:

    liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libssl.so.10()(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

    libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) is needed by elog-3.1.5-1.el7.x86_64

 

Any clues from developers to resolve it and keep the software working. Thank you in advance!

Bests, Nina

  66016   Mon Oct 27 13:05:13 2008 Entry George B.i93.borg@gmail.comBug reportLinux2.7.5Installation problems
Hello,

I just upgraded to elog 2.7.5 from 2.6.4 on my Debian system. Here is some feedback:

1) "make" fails if libssl-dev package is not installed. Documentation does not mention SSL library requirements.

2) /etc/init.d/elogd: line 10: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No such file or directory (I fixed this by commenting
out that line).

3) Starting elogd: /etc/init.d/elogd: line 34: echo_success: command not found (Fixed by search/replace "echo_"
to "echo ").


Hope this helps.

George.
  65976   Mon Sep 15 16:22:39 2008 Question Wythe ITcarwile@avwtech.comBug reportWindows2.7.4Install on Server 2003:

I am using Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition.  It is up-to-date and a full legal version installed from a geniune MS disk (to put that notion out the way).  I host a variety of webpages from this server through IIS6.0.

I am having an issue after installation of the ELOG software.  I grabbed the newest version from this website and ran the executable.  It installed fine (or appeared to do so).

Upon starting the ELOG server I receive the following error:

elogd.exe - Unable to Locate Component

This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found.  Re-installing the application may fix this problem.

 

The file in question is part of an ancient Visual C distributeable.  This distributeable for my purposes no longer appears to be available (as I am on .net 3.5).  I am unsure of downloading the older runtime libraries from sites that are not microsoft's.  I am curious as to how I could go about making elog execute.  Any help would be appreciated.  Thank you!

 

  1444   Mon Oct 10 19:22:51 2005 Warning Exaos LeeExaos.Lee@gmail.comBug reportMac OSX2.6.0-betaInstall error on MacOS X
Executing "make" on MacOS X is OK, but "make install" failed due to the following error:
/usr/bin/install -m 0755 -d /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/man/man1/ /usr/local/man/man8/
/usr/bin/install -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elog elconv /usr/local/bin
install: bin: Invalid argument
make: *** [install] Error 67

The reason is that the account "bin" and group "bin" are missing on MacOS X. I also found that the following lines in "Makefile" doesn't work:
ifeq ($(OSTYPE),darwin)
CC = cc
endif

I have fixed this problem. The diff of Makefile as following:
diff Makefile.darwin Makefile.origin
====================================
24,25d23
< BINOWNER = bin
< BINGROUP = bin
30,31d27
< OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
<
40,43d35
< ifeq ($(OSTYPE),Darwin)
< OSTYPE=darwin
< endif
<
46,47d37
< BINOWNER = root
< BINGROUP = admin
89,90c79,80
<       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o ${BINOWNER} -g ${BINGROUP} elog elconv $(DESTDIR)
<       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o ${BINOWNER} -g ${BINGROUP} elogd $(SDESTDIR)
---
>       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elog elconv $(DESTDIR)
>       $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -o bin -g bin elogd $(SDESTDIR)


The modified Makefiles have been attached.
Attachment 1: makefile_modified.tgz
  1843   Fri Jun 2 21:20:06 2006 Question Elaine Cristina Franchini dos Anjoselaine@ccuec.unicamp.brQuestionLinux2.6.1-1681Inserting images via Internet Explorer
Hi Stefan,

I observed that there is a difference between IE and others browsers.
When I use "insert image" button in Netscape, for instance,
it creates automatically a tag like
[IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG]
and
includes an attachment in the ELOG entry.

When a try to do the same action in Internet Explorer, only
the attachment is created without the tag
[IMG]elog:1/1[/IMG]
.

I did the same test using this forum, and the results are identical
that was related above.

Is it a bug or I'm doing something wrong ?

Thanks,

Elaine
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6